Post on 31-May-2018
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 1/19
Trademarks and
Fair Use:Some Rules of theRoad
CorynneMcSherryStaff Attorney
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 2/19
Trademark Basics• Trademarks are not copyrights
– What is protected: words, symbols, colors,
etc. used in commerce to designate thesource of goods and services
– Roots in consumer protection and unfaircompetition
– Distinct “use” and “fair use” principles– Distinct approaches to secondary liability
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 3/19
Trademark Use
•Is the mark being used in
commerce?•Is the mark placed on any
goods, containers, displaysor advertisements?
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 4/19
Noncommercial Use
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 5/19
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 6/19
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 7/19
NFU applies where: “a mark user hasused the plaintiff's mark to describethe plaintiff's product , even if thedefendant's ultimate goal is to
describe his own product . . . .”Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co., 292 F.3d1139, 1152 (9th Cir. 2002).
• E.g., “We repair Volkswagens.” and“Soda lovers say Pepsi tastes betterthan Coca Cola.”
•Compare “classic” fair use:
Essentially a nontrademark use.
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 8/19
Elements of NominativeFair Use
(1)the markholders’ product or service in questionis not readily identifiable without use of thetrademark;
• only so much of the mark or marks was used aswas reasonably necessary to identify theproduct or service; and
(3)the user did nothing that would, in conjunctionwith the mark, suggest sponsorship orendorsement by the trademark holder.
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 9/19
First Amendment
Balance• Lanham Act applies “to artistic works
only where public interest in avoidingconsumer confusion outweighs publicinterest in free expression.” WalkingMountain, 353 F.3d at 807.
• Origin: Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994(2d Cir. 1989) (Use of trademark inliterary title).
• Adopted by Ninth Circuit in Mattel v.MCA Records, 296 F.3d 894 (9th Cir.2002) (use of trademark in song title).
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 10/19
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 11/19
ESS Entertainment v. Rockstar: Videogame uses animated image based onreal strip club. Fair use?
• No nominative fair use: RockstarGames did not design the Pig Pento identify or refer specifically tothe Play Pen => NFU defensedoesn’t apply
• BUT First Amendment protects useof Play Pen’s trademarks and tradedress
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 12/19
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 13/19
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 14/19
Linden Labs: Proceed and
Permit Notice• “Linden Lab objects to any implication that it would employ lawyers incapable of
distinguishing such obvious parody. Indeed, any competent attorney is well aware
that the outcome of sending a cease-and-desist letter regarding a parody is only to
draw more attention to such parody, and to invite public scorn and ridicule of the
humor-impaired legal counsel. Linden Lab is well-known for having strict hiring
standards, including a requirement for having a sense of humor, from which our
lawyers receive no exception. . . . Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is possible that
your use of the modified eye-in-hand logo for Second Life, even as parody, requires
license from Linden Lab, especially with respect to your sale of goods with the
parody mark at http://www.cafepress.com/getafirstlife/. Linden Lab hereby grants
you a nonexclusive, nontransferable, nonsublicenseable, revocable, limited license
to use the modified eye-in-hand logo (as displayed on http://www.getafirstlife.com/ as of January 21, 2007) to identify only your goods and/or services that are sold at
http://www.cafepress.com/getafirstlife/. This license may be modified, addended, or
revoked at any time by Linden Lab in its sole discretion.”
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 15/19
Secondary Liability
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 16/19
Contributory Liability• Intentional inducement OR
• Supply with actual or constructive knowledge
the product will be used to infringe a mark – When service rather than product , court must
consider “the extent of the control exercised by thedefendant over the third party’s means of infringement” Lockheed Martin Corp v. Network Solutions, Inc. 194 F. 3d 980, 984 (9th Cir. 1999).
– Specifically, there must be “direct control and
monitoring of the instrumentality used by the thirdparty to infringe.” Id.
– No liability where defendant lacked“the power toremove infringing material” or “directly stop[its]distribution of the Internet.” Perfect 10 v. VisaInt’l Service Assoc., et al., 494 F3d 788, 807 (9th Cir
2007)
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 17/19
Vicarious Liability
• Defendant and infringer musthave:
– Actual or apparent partnership
– Authority to bind each other intransactions with third parties OR
– Joint ownership or control overinfringing product
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 18/19
The Innocent Infringer
• Limits liability for printers, publishersand broadcasters who innocently
publish/broadcast infringing ads--injunctive relief only.
• Extends to web marketplaces, e.g.,eBay, if no prior knowledge of infringing
nature of seller’s goods or services.Hendrickson v. eBay , 165 F.Supp.2d1082 (C.D. Cal. 2001).
8/14/2019 EFF: EFF bootcamp CM TM fairuse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-eff-bootcamp-cm-tm-fairuse 19/19
Trademark Dilution
• Dilution by blurring or tarnishment
• In practice, tends to follow
infringement
• Recent liberalization of standard--only have to show likelihood of
dilution• ONLY nationally famous marks
• Fair use, noncommercial use and
constitutional limits apply