Post on 02-Nov-2014
description
15th – 27th January, 2011Madinah, KSA
Participant’s Program
Evaluation
Program for Advanced Leadership & Management
Enhance Leadership Excellent Investment Recommend the program Future Participation0
1
2
3
4
54.6 4.6
4.8 4.7
PALM 2 Overall RatingSt
rong
ly D
isag
ree
Stro
ngly
Agr
ee
Avg.: 4.67
Enhanced My Leadership
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0% 0% 0%
41%
59%
Average: 4.6 Variance: 0.25
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0% 0% 0%
44%
56%Variance: 0.25
Average: 4.6
Excellent Investment
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
0% 0% 0%
24%
76%
Average: 4.8 Variance: 0.18
Would Recommend The Program Would Like to Participate Again
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0% 0% 0%
26%
74%Average: 4.7 Variance:
0.20
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Perc
enta
gePe
rcen
tage
Overall Rating: Two Programs Comparison St
rong
ly D
isag
ree
Stro
ngly
Ag
ree
Enhance Leadership Excellent Investment Recommend The Program
Future Participation0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
PALM 2PALM 1
Average : 4.3
Average : 4.67
Enhanced My LeadershipPe
rcen
tage
10%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0%4%
11%
42% 42%
0% 0% 0%
41%
59%
Average: 4.2 Average: 4.6
PALM 1
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2% 4%11%
33%
49%
0% 0% 0%
44%
56%
Average: 4.2 Average: 4.6
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
0%7% 4%
31%
58%
0% 0% 0%
24%
76%
Average: 4.4 Average: 4.8
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
2%7% 2%
29%
60%
0% 0% 0%
26%
74%
Average: 4.3 Average: 4.7
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
PALM 2
Excellent Investment
Would Recommend The Program Would Like to Participate Again
Administrative &
Logistics
Administration & logisticsSt
rong
ly D
isag
ree
Stro
ngly
Agr
ee
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.04.7 4.7 4.7 4.7
4.84.97
4.3 4.2 4.1
Avg.: 4.6
Communication
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
0% 0% 0%
26%
74%Average: 4.7 Variance: 0.20
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
0% 0% 3%
26%
71%
Variance: 0.28
Average: 4.7
Program Brochure
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
0% 0% 0%
31%
69%
Average: 4.7 Variance: 0.22
Registration Process
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Perc
enta
ge
Perc
enta
ge
Professionalism of MILE staff
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
0% 0% 0%
31%
69%
Average: 4.7 Variance: 0.22
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
0% 0% 0%
17%
83%Variance: 0.15
Average: 4.8
Overall Quality of Administration
1 2 3 4 50%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0% 0% 0% 3%
97%
Average: 4.97 Variance: 0.03
Madinah as a Program Location
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Perc
enta
ge
Perc
enta
ge
Overall Quality of VenuePe
rcen
tage
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0%
7%
15%
27%
51%
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree4.2
Venue Selection (Oberoi Hotel)
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0%6%
11%
29%
54%Average: 4.3 Variance: 0.81
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0% 3%
23% 23%
51%
Variance: 0.83
Average: 4.2
Quality of Accomodation
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0%
11% 11%
29%
49%
Average: 4.1 Variance: 1.07
Food & Beverages
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Perc
enta
ge
Perc
enta
ge
Administration & logisticsSt
rong
ly D
isag
ree
Stro
ngly
Agr
ee
PALM 2 Average : 4.6
Communication
Progra
m Broch
ure
Regist
ration Pro
cess
Profes
sionali
sm of M
ILE St
aff
Overal
l Quali
ty of A
dministrati
on
Madinah
as a
Progra
m Locati
on
Venue S
electi
on (Obero
i Hotel
)
Quality
of Acco
mmodation
Food an
d Bevera
ges
0
1
2
3
4
5
4.474.23
4.364.57
4.394.18 4.19 4.27 4.27
4.7 4.7 4.7 4.74.8
5.0
4.3 4.2 4.1
PALM 1 Average : 4.3
Program Fees
Low
80 %
17 %
3%
Light Lunch Preferences
Light Lunch PreferencesDo you prefer that MILE continues to offer light lunch in its
future programs?
77 %
23 %
YES
NO
Program Design
Program Design EvaluationSt
rong
ly
Dis
agre
eSt
rong
ly
Agr
ee
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.04.6 4.5 4.6
4.4 4.5
4.2
4.7
Variance: 0.25 0.37 0.31 0.42 0.31 0.68 0.28
Avg.: 4.5
Relevance of Program Content
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0% 0% 0%
43%
57%
Average: 4.6 Variance: 0.25
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0% 0%6%
40%
54%Variance: 0.37
Average: 4.5
Program Structure
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0% 0% 3%
37%
60%
Average: 4.6 Variance: 0.31
Program Length Learning From Other Participants
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0% 0%
9%
43%49%
Average: 4.4 Variance: 0.42
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Perc
enta
gePe
rcen
tage
Speakers Mix
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0% 0% 3%
40%
57%
Average: 4.5/5 Variance: 0.31
Pre-Events Activities
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
0% 0% 3%
26%
71%
Average: 4.6 Variance: 0.31
Complimentary Books
1 2 3 4 50%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%
0%3%
17%
40% 40%
Average: 4.2 Variance: 0.68
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Perc
enta
ge
Perc
enta
ge
Program Design Preferences
75 %
25 %
Just right
Too lo
ng
Program Duration Daily Contact Hours
66 %
34 %
Just right
Too lo
ng
Program DeliverySt
rong
ly
Dis
agre
e
Stro
ngl
y A
gree
Speakers Experties Speakers Presentation Time Allocated for Q & A Networking Opportunities0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
4.5
4.1 4.24.4
Variance: 0.31 0.24 0.64 0.53
Avg.: 4.3
Speaker’s Expertise
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0% 0% 3%
49% 49%
Average: 4.5
Variance: 0.31
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
0% 0%6%
74%
20%
Variance: 0.24
Average: 4.1
Speakers Presentation
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0%6% 6%
51%
37%
Average: 4.2 Variance: 0.64
Time Allocation for Q&A Networking Opportunities
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0% 0%
14%
34%
51%
Average: 4.4 Variance: 0.53
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Perc
enta
gePe
rcen
tage
Daily Photo Display
Daily Photo Display
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
0%3%
0%
20%
77%
Average: 4.7 Variance: 0.39
Yes
No
94 %
6 %
Interesting Should MILE Continue it in Future?
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strength Mirror
My Strength’s Mirror
1 2 3 4 50%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0% 0%
15%
38%
47%
Average: 4.3 Variance: 0.53
Yes
No
91 %
9 %
Interesting Should MILE Continue in Future?
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Pre-Program Online Profiling
Pre-Program Online Profiling
1 2 3 4 50%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0% 0%
12%
44% 44%
Average : 4.3 Variance: 0.47
Tools usefulness
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
92 %
8 %
Completed Online Assessment
Yes
No
Had a Report Feedback Session
22 %
78 %
No
Yes
No
96 %
4 %
Should MILE Continue this in Future?
Learning Log
Learning Log
1 2 3 4 50%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
6% 6%
18%
47%
24%
Average: 3.8 Variance: 1.16
90 %
10 %
Yes
No
Interesting Should MILE Continue This in Future?
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Field Trips
Number of Field Trips Participated In
1 2 3 40%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%42%
29%
17%
13%
Average: 2.0 Variance: 1.35
Perc
enta
ge
number of field trips
Field Trips Evaluation
The trips w
ere use
ful
The guides were
of high qualit
y
Timing and le
ngth w
as appro
priate
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0 4.5 4.4 4.2
Variance: 0.69 1.03 1.44
Freq
uenc
y
Avg.: 4.3
1 2 3 4 50%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
0%4%
8%17%
71%
Variance: 0.69
Average: 4.5
Trips Usefulness
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
4%0%
13%21%
63%
Average: 4.4 Variance: 1.03
Professionalism of Tours Guides Appropriateness of Timing and Length
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
8%0%
12%20%
60%
Average: 4.2 Variance: 1.44
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Perc
enta
ge
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
4%
4%
78%
15%
No
Appropriate as is
Should MILE Continue to Use Field Trips in the Future?Pe
rcen
tage
Umrah Trip
Umrah Trips
100 %
Yes
Participated Should MILE continue this in future?
69 %
20 %11 %
Yes
No
Umrah Trips Evaluation
Bus arrangements Quality of Makkah Hotel Tour Guides Professionalism0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.04.6
4.84.6
Variance: 0.49 0.18 0.71
Freq
uenc
y
Avg.: 4.65
Wisdom of the Day
Daily Wisdom of The Day
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0% 0%3%
6%
91%
Average: 4.9 Variance: 0.16
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
60%
40%
0%0%
Usefulness Should MILE Continue This in Future?
Appropriate as is
More Frequent
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Less FrequentNo
Daily Quiz
Daily Quiz
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0%3% 3%
34%
60%
Average: 4.5 Variance: 0.49
Concept Is Interesting Gifts are Valuable
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
1 2 3 4 50%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0% 0%
17%
37%
46%
Average: 4.3 Variance: 0.56
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Quiz Concept
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0%
74%
26%
Easy Moderate Difficult
Level of Difficulty Should MILE continue this in future?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0%
6%
57%
37%
No Less Frequent
Appropriate as is
More Frequent
Perc
enta
ge
Aerobics
Number of Aerobic Sessions Participated in
1 2 3 40%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
41%
29%
21%
9%
Average: 2.1 Variance: 1.23
Perc
enta
ge
Number of Aerobic Sessions
Aerobics
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0% 0% 0%
13%
87%
Average: 4.9 Variance: 0.12
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0% 0%
59%
41%
Usefulness Should MILE continue this in future?
No Less frequent
Appropriate as is
More frequent
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Gala Dinners
Gala Dinners
1 2 3 4 50%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0%3% 3%
47% 47%
Average: 4.4 Variance: 0.48
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0%
37%
49%
14%
Great Networking Opportunity Should MILE Continue This in Future?
No Less frequent
Appropriate as is
More frequent
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Perc
enta
ge
Thematic Dinners
1 2 3 4 50%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0%
6%9%
41%44%
Average: 4.3 Variance: 0.73
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
3%
9%
80%
9%
Concept is Great Should MILE Continue This in Future?
No Less frequent
Appropriate as is
More frequent
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Knowledge Sharing Dinners
Knowledge Sharing Dinners
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0%3%
71%
26%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0%
6%
71%
23%
Good idea for sharing experience Should MILE continue this in future?
No Less Frequent
Appropriate as is
More FrequentNo Less
frequentAppropriate
as isMore
frequent
Perc
enta
ge
Medical Check-Up
46 %54 %
Availed this service
Yes
No
Benefited from this service
76 %
24 %
Yes
Medical Check-Up
No
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
8%0%
76%
16%
No Less Frequent
Appropriate as is
More Frequent
Should MILE continue this in future?
Perc
enta
ge
Books Exhibition
Books Exhibition
1 2 3 4 50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
6%3%
6%
32%
53%
Average: 4.3 Variance: 1.20
Good Opportunity for Valuable Books Should MILE continue this in future?
97 %
3%
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Internet Cafe
Internet Cafe
1 2 3 4 50%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
10% 10%
16%
39%
26%
Average: 3.7 Variance: 1.59
Internet Cafe Was Suitable Wireless Access Was Suitable
1 2 3 4 50%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
13%
22%
16%
28%
22%
Average: 3.3 Variance: 1.87
Perc
enta
ge
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Thank You
www.mile.org