CREW 2010 Annual Report

Post on 09-Apr-2018

214 views 0 download

Transcript of CREW 2010 Annual Report

  • 8/8/2019 CREW 2010 Annual Report

    1/16

    buil

    dingA

    bEtt

    ERWAshington

    2010

    NNlEp

    title

    RepoRtDAtA

  • 8/8/2019 CREW 2010 Annual Report

    2/16

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    AdvAnCing thE publiC tRust

    vision

    Section1

    Section

    2

    Section

    3

    Cm

    pN

    lEl

    Section4

    Section5

    NvES

    NS

    ECS

    Section6

    Section7

    Cllb

    N

    NSpENC

    Many Americans have givenup on our political system,writing off our elected leadersas crooks. At CREW, we

    believe politicians must be heldaccountable for their actions.Day in and day out, we work toensure government ofcialsregardless of party afliation

    act with honesty and integrityand merit the public trust.

    LeeLorenz/TheNewYorkerCollection/www.cartoonbank.com.

  • 8/8/2019 CREW 2010 Annual Report

    3/16

    Section

    1 Summary StatementActivities for the 12 Months Ended

    December 31, 2009

    REvEnuE

    Total Revenue & Support $2,240,7

    ExpEnsEs

    Education

    (Research & Communications) 1,158,6

    Legal 605,9

    Ethics Watch Colorado 310,2

    Total Program 2,074,8

    General Administrative 369

    Development 151,4

    Total Expenses 2,595,4

    Change in Net Assets (354,6

    Net Assets, Beginning of Period 3,250,4

    nEt AssEts, End of pERiod 2,895,7

    The above information should be read in conjunction with CREWs nancial statements fo

    the 12 months ending December 31, 2009 from which the summarized information is deri

    CREW accomplishes this by marrying

    in-depth research and investigation

    with hard-charging legal action and an

    aggressive communications strategy.

    We augment these efforts by building

    coalitions to push for policies favoring

    transparency and accountability. To

    garner support for our efforts, we use all

    mediums of the modern mediatelevision,

    radio, print, and social networkingtomaximize coverage of our work.

    Its always easier to tear something down

    than to build it up, and building a better

    Washington is no different. CREW rmly

    believes, however, that a small group of

    committed citizens can change the world;

    it is the only thing that ever has. totAl pRogRAm 80%

    gEnERAl AdministRAtivE 14%

    dEvElopmEnt 6%

  • 8/8/2019 CREW 2010 Annual Report

    4/16

    Section

    2

    Avoiding Judicial RevieThe dysfunctional FEC is

    failing to fulll its mission

    dEmAnding ACtion

    The dysfunctional Federal Election

    Commission often takes years to

    act on campaign nance violation

    complaints. Even when it does reach

    a decision, the agency frequently

    fails to provide the legally required

    60 days notice of when and why

    it has dismissed a complaint. Frus-

    trated by the FECs obvious efforts

    to avoid enforcing the law, CREW

    sued, alleging the commission has

    a policy and practice of dismissing

    complaints in order to avoid judicial

    review of its decisions. In this post-

    Citizens Unitedera, the FECs refusal

    to fulll its mission presents an

    even greater danger that it will

    be considered optional to follow

    campaign nance laws.

    Used with the permission of Adam Zyglis and The Buffalo News.

    TE DEpARTMET F JSTCE has

    launched several signicant public corruptioninvestigations over the past few years.

    Nevertheless, prosecutions of lawmakers

    have been few and far between. DOJ recently

    declined to prosecute former House Majority

    Leader Tom DeLay, despite the luxury travel,

    meals, and tickets he received from Jack

    Abramoff in return for legislative favors.

    Similarly, following the guilty plea of the

    founder of the PMA Group, Paul Magliocchett

    to making illegal conduit campaign

    contributions, DOJ ended its investigation

    into a possible pay-to-play scheme between

    the lobbying rm and members of the House

    Defense Appropriations Committee. CREW

    wants to know why Mr. DeLay and the

    members of Congress implicated in the PMA

    scandal walked away clean so we led Freedo

    of Information Act (FOIA) requests for record

    in both cases. The American people deserve

    to learn the truth about these scandals.

  • 8/8/2019 CREW 2010 Annual Report

    5/16

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    3

    lEgAl

    cRew

    FAct

    cRew

    FAct

    0N

    mbECESNSDEl

    6NmbEESDElNvESN

    Jack AbramoffAfter AlexGibney, the Oscar-winning

    director ofCasino Jack and theUnited States of Money, revealed

    to CREW that the Bureau ofPrisons blocked Jack Abramoff

    from participating in the movieabout him, CREW submitted

    a FOIA request for recordsregarding how the Departmentof Justice handled requests to

    interview Mr. Abramoff. WhenDOJ stonewalled, CREW sued

    to discover who wanted to keephim quiet.

    Domestic Violence CREW suedthe Army for failing to produce

    data of acts of domestic violencecommitted by soldiers. We

    learned the Department ofDefense (DOD) does not track

    acts of domestic violence,despite promising Congressto do so. CREW is working with

    Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY)to push the DOD to take this

    problem seriously.

    onest Services CREW led anamicus brief before the SupremeCourt in U.S. v.Black, arguing

    in favor of the constitutionality

    of the honest services fraudstatutea key prosecutorial toolghting public corruption. Since

    the Court held most uses of thecharge unconstitutional, CREWhas worked with congressional

    staff and DOJ to craft a revisedstatute that would withstand

    judicial scrutiny.

    Section2

    Cororate Secrecy CREWled an amicus brief before

    the Supreme Court inAT&T v.FCC, arguing that the Freedom

    of Information Act does notafford corporations privacy

    rights. Finding a corporate rightto privacy under the statutewould deny the public access

    to records concerning a widerange of public health, safety,

    and welfare issues just becausecorporations might be subject

    to public embarrassment.

    Seech or Debate CREW ledan amicus brief on behalf ofthe government in its prosecu-

    tion of former Rep. Rick Renzi(R-AZ) before the Ninth Circuit

    Court of Appeals. CREWargued Rep. Renzis expansive

    view of the Speech or DebateClause of the Constitution,which prohibits the government

    from using legislative materialagainst a member of Congress,

    would render lawmakersimmune from prosecution

    for abusing their positionsfor personal nancial gain.

    Ew YEAR,Ew CRESS,Ew wESTE!

    Seen here for the rst time,

    the new citizensforethics.org

    will allow CREW to better

    engage supporters and

    reporters across all media

    platforms and signicantly

    increase online engagement.

  • 8/8/2019 CREW 2010 Annual Report

    6/16

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    4

    Section

    3

    cRew

    FAct

    cRew

    FAct