CitySpeak XII: The Water We Drink - Carlos Lo of Polytechnic University

Post on 09-May-2015

1.779 views 0 download

description

Where does the water we drink come from? Is there enough for everyone? Where will it come from? Hong Kong's water supply comes from two sources: the rainfall we collect in our reservoirs (20-30%) and water we buy from the Mainland (70-80%). The current agreement for water from the Dongjiang, a tributary of the Pearl River, will expire in 2015. With demand for water growing sharply throughout the Pearl River Delta and the supply of water compromised by pollution and climate change, Hong Kong's future access to clean water is far from certain. In our drive to become a sustainable city, should Hong Kong become self-sufficient? Should we increase the size of our reservoirs? Follow Singapore and recycle our waste water? Build plants to desalinate seawater? What other possible methods are there? Who's going to pay? CitySpeak invites you to join Hong Kong officials, academics and planners in this discussion about our water issues. The keynote speaker is Mr. LT Ma, Director of the Water Supplies Department, who will set the scene and outline the current situation in Hong Kong. The discussion will be moderated by Mr. Mike Kilburn, Environmental Programme Manager, Civic Exchange. Background reading "Liquid Assets -- Water security and management in the Pearl River Basin and Hong Kong" by Civic Exchange, November 2009 (http://www.civic-exchange.org/eng/upload/files/091204LiquidAssets.pdf). For more information about water in China, visit http://www.asiawaterproject.org/. Civic Exchange is a Hong Kong independent non-profit think tank. See: www.civic-exchange.org Designing Hong Kong is a not-for-profit organisation focused on sustainable urban planning. See: www.designinghongkong.com

Transcript of CitySpeak XII: The Water We Drink - Carlos Lo of Polytechnic University

The Political Economy of Water Resources Conservation in China:

Reconciling Bureaucratic Conflicts in Conserving Dongjiang’s Water Resources

Carlos LoDepartment of Marketing and ManagementThe Polytechnic University of Hong Kong

May 2010

“Fragmented authoritarianism” model

CityA

City B

Conflicts

Provincial Government

Bargaining BargainingConsensus

Reform: complicates bargaining relations

- reform decentralization of authority

central: coercive means central: ideology local units: resource autonomy local units: bargaining position

Water and bargaining

- water decisions: best reveal bargaining process

scarce resource multiple users (one use precludes another) transboundary (administrative)

Drainage area:

35,340 km2

Mainstem:

562 kmAnnual average discharge:

32.66 billion m3

Population served:

30+ million

Upstream zone

Midstream zone

Downstream zone

Hydrologists’ perspective:

Upstream zone

10% drainage area

6% annual discharge

Downstream zone

90% drainage area

94% annual discharge

Jiangxi’s perspective:

Upstream zone

Midstream zone

Downstream zone

Guangdong’s perspective:

215

1,501

3,7115,9019,206

10,21129,900

per capita GDP2008US$

Upstream zone:

- water resources conservation

shut down polluting ind. refuse polluting investment

1973

1961

1984

Upstream zone:

- water resources conservation

reservoirs> migrants

conservation forest> forest farmers

Upstream zone:

- unfair distribution of burden intra-basin disparity

- development restricted underdevelopment

- priorities “ecological compensation” supportive policies

Downstream zone: - resist direct compensation higher authorities to handle

- priorities clean & sufficient water

- bargaining actions plead w/ higher-ups

1.763

2.5332.0950.553

1.6631.100

Guangdong water allocation plan:

10.66 billion m3

Dongjiang River Basin compensation:

- targets reservoir migrants conservation forest farmers Heyuan City Government

Compensation for Xunwu?

- none from downstream

Conclusion

- new bargaining strategies direct, bottom-up extra-bureaucratic channels

- grievances: unresolved undermine long-term conservation efforts