Bioreactors for the Reduction of Nutrient Transport.

Post on 26-Dec-2015

241 views 2 download

Tags:

Transcript of Bioreactors for the Reduction of Nutrient Transport.

5’ Soil Backfill

Trench bottom 1’ Below tile invert

20’ section of tile

Length dependent on treatment area

DiversionStructure

CapacityControlStructure

Woodchips

Bioreactors for the Bioreactors for the Reduction of Nutrient Reduction of Nutrient

TransportTransport

Why Bioreactors ? Proven technology

Requires no modification of current practices

No land taken out of production

No decrease in drainage effectiveness

Very low maintenance

Estimated life - 15 to 20 years

Cost effective

CapacityControlStructure

5’ Soil Backfill

Woodchips

Trench bottom 1’ Below tile invert

20’ section of tile

Length dependent on treatment area

DiversionStructure

Second Generation Bioreactors

Capacity controlstructure

Up

to

so

ilsu

rfac

e

Side View

Trench bottom 1’ below tile invert

5’ section of non-perforated tile

Length dependent on treatment area

Diversionstructure

Top View

5’ Soil backfill

10’ W

ide

Third Generation BioreactorsThird Generation Bioreactors

Solid pipe

Solid pipe

Perforated pipePerforated pipe

Plastic Liner

Managed Drainage28 acres

100 ft Spacing

Free Drainage31 acres

100 ft Spacing

W

Managed DrainageWith Bioreactor

34 acres100 ft Spacing

Managed DrainageWith Bioreactor

28 acres100 ft Spacing

Free Drainage31 acres

100 ft Spacing

W

Managed DrainageWith Bioreactor

34 acres100 ft Spacing

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1/3 2/2 3/3 4/2 5/2 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/30 9/29 10/29 11/28

Nit

rate

-N (m

g/L)

Flow

Rat

e (c

m/d

ay)

Deland East 2008

Flow Rate Inlet Nitrate-N Outlet Nitrate-N

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1/3/08 2/22/08 4/12/08 6/1/08 7/21/08 9/9/08 10/29/08 12/18/08

Nitr

ate-

N (m

g/L)

Monticello 2008

Inlet Nitrate-N Outlet nitrate-N

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11/08/08 11/28/08 12/18/08 01/07/09 01/27/09 02/16/09 03/08/09 03/28/09

Nit

rate

-N (

mg

/L)

Nitrate Concentrations at Monticello Site 2009

Inlet Outlet Free

ProgressCity

FP3/4FP5/6FP7/8

FP1/2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

1/3 2/2 3/3 4/2 5/2 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/30 9/29 10/29 11/28

Nit

rate

-N (m

g/L)

Flow

Rat

e (L

/s)

FP07/08 2008

Flow Rate Inlet Nitrate-N Outlet Nitrate-N

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0

10

2/2 3/3 4/2 5/2 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/30 9/29 10/29 11/28

Nit

rate

-N (m

g/L)

Flow

Rat

e (L

/s)

FP03/04 2008

Flow Rate Inlet Nitrate-N Outlet Nitrate-N

SiteContributing area

(acres)Loading Density (acre/ 100sq. ft.)

Load Reduction(%)

Decatur West 5 1.25 81

Decatur East 16 4 54

DeLand East 34 8.5 42

Bioreactor EfficacyBioreactor Efficacy

LR = 87.3LD-0.343

R² = 0.99

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Lo

ad

Re

du

cti

on

, L

R(%

)

Loading Density LD (acres/100 square ft of bioreactor)

Bioreactor Efficacy

Sizing a system for a 60% removal from

40 acres ?

LR = 87.3LD-0.343

R² = 0.99

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Lo

ad

Re

du

cti

on

, L

R(%

)

Loading Density LD (acres/100 square ft of bioreactor)

Bioreactor Efficacy

100*40/3 = 1333 sq. ft.

LR = 87.3LD-0.343

R² = 0.99

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Lo

ad

Re

du

cti

on

, L

R(%

)

Loading Density LD (acres/100 square ft of bioreactor)

Bioreactor EfficacyCurrent Work

Unintended Consequences?Unintended Consequences?

Sampling Bioreactors

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a sub-surface bioreactor (R. Cooke).

Inlet Samples

Outlet Samples

Dissolved MeHg in Bioreactor Inlets

-Eight non-detects-Eight non-detects

-Six samples contained detectable MeHg-Six samples contained detectable MeHg

- Maximum: - Maximum: 0.16 ng/L0.16 ng/L

- Average:- Average: 0.09 ng/L0.09 ng/L

Dissolved MeHg in Bioreactor Outlets

Dissolved MeHg in Bioreactor Outlets

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

6/1 6/16 7/1 7/16 7/31 8/15 8/30 9/14 9/29 10/14 10/29 11/13

Dis

solv

ed M

ethy

lmer

cury

(ng

/L)

Inlet

Outlet

Outflow

2/10/09

No Outflow

Capacity controlstructure

Up

to

so

ilsu

rfac

e

Side View

Trench bottom 1’ below tile invert

5’ section of non-perforated tile

Length dependent on treatment area

Diversionstructure

Top View

5’ Soil backfill

10’ W

ide

Trench bottom at tile invert

What about Phosphorus?

P R

em

oval?

Four 6” PVC Bioreactor Cells

20 ft Woodchips5 ft Iron Filings

Two Cells with Filings Upstream

Two Cells with Woodchips Upstream

Temperature Sensors

Gas Extraction Ports

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

48

1216

2024

28

NO

3+N

O2

as N

(mg/

L)

Time from start (hrs)

Column A

ABCD.0 A.1 A.2

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

48

1216

2024

28

NO

3+N

O2

as N

(mg/

L)

Time from start (hrs)

Column B

ABCD.0 B.1 B.2

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

48

1216

2024

28

NO

3+N

O2

as N

(mg/

L)

Time from start (hrs)

Column C

ABCD.0 C.1 C.2

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

48

1216

2024

28

NO

3+N

O2

as N

(mg/

L)

Time from start (hrs)

Column D

ABCD.0 D.1 D.2

Phosphorus Removal Chamber

Solid pipe

Solid 6” pipe

Perforated pipePerforated pipe

Plastic Liner

87.576.565.554.543.532.521.510.50

150,000

140,000

130,000

120,000

110,000

100,000

90,000

80,000

70,000

60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0

14131211109876543210

1,000

950

900

850

800

750

700

650

600

550

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0