Bioprinting for osteochondral tissue regeneration · •A model of an organ is not a functional...

Post on 01-Jun-2020

2 views 0 download

Transcript of Bioprinting for osteochondral tissue regeneration · •A model of an organ is not a functional...

Bioprinting for

skeletal tissue regeneration

Current strategies and future perspectives

Veerle Bloemen

Biofabrication Lab

Faculty of Engineering Technology

Prometheus - Division of Skeletal TissueEngineering

Faculty of Engineering Technology2

Will we soon be printing organs?

All rights reserved © 2020

Faculty of Engineering Technology3 All rights reserved © 2020

Faculty of Engineering Technology4

YES?

All rights reserved © 2020

• A model of an organ is not a functional organ

• Bioprinting involves biological material such as living cells or

proteins

• An organ has a complex architecture related to its function

Faculty of Engineering Technology5

A few important remarks

YES? -> NO

All rights reserved © 2020

Faculty of Engineering Technology6

There is a need

All rights reserved © 2020

Data from optn.transplant.hrsa.gov and OPTN/SRTR Annual Report.

Faculty of Engineering Technology7

Critical skeletal defects

All rights reserved © 2020

Critical bone defects

Osteochondral defects

Ho-Shui-Ling et al., 2018

Faculty of Engineering Technology8

Current treatments

All rights reserved © 2020

• Autografts

• Allografts

• Xenografts

Tissue transplants

Material-based implants

• Metal implants

• Ceramic implants

Several limitations:

- Minimal tissue availability

- Donor side morbidity

- Wear -> 2nd surgery

- Limited implant integration

- …

(replacement strategies)

From replacement towards regeneration

Faculty of Engineering Technology9

The traditional concept of Tissue Engineering

All rights reserved © 2020

The development of

cell-based implants for

tissue regeneration

Skeletal tissue engineering

Dvir et.al., 2011

Leonardo Da Vinci, 1452-1519All rights reserved © 2018

Increase robustness

Faculty of Engineering TechnologyAll rights reserved © 2020

• Implanted cells significantly contribute to tissue regeneration

• A biomimetic approach improves tissue formation: using engineering

strategies based on principles in developmental biology

• Large variability in the in vivo outcome

• One size does not fit all

Faculty of Engineering Technology12

Insights from traditional TE-results

All rights reserved © 2020

Faculty of Engineering Technology13 All rights reserved © 2020

Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products

Tissue Engineering approaches are challenged in terms of reproducibility

and clinical relevance of the cell-based product

Journal of market access & health policy,

2016

sCTMP: somatic cell therapy medicinal product

GTMP: gene therapy medicinal product

TEP: tissue engineered product

Combined products: cellular/tissue part + medical device

Faculty of Engineering Technology14 All rights reserved © 2020

Faculty of Engineering Technology15 All rights reserved © 2020Papantoniou et al , 2019

Faculty of Engineering Technology16

Top-down versus bottom-up Tissue Engineering

All rights reserved © 2020Tiruvannamalai-Annamalai et al, 2014

Faculty of Engineering Technology17

Bioprinting as a tool for the precise fabrication of

complex architectures

All rights reserved © 2020

Faculty of Engineering Technology18 All rights reserved © 2020Mandrycky et al , 2015

Faculty of Engineering Technology19

The process of bioprinting

All rights reserved © 2020Murphy et al , 2015

Bioprinting for

osteochondral regeneration

20

21

Osteochondral tissue

Nukavarapu et al. 2013 Biotechnol Adv

Subchondral

bone

Articular

cartilage

! Articular cartilage is avascular and aneural !

• Articular cartilage

• Superficial zone (A)

• Middle zone (B)

• Deep zone (C)

Calcified cartilage

• Subchondral bone (D)

Faculty of Engineering TechnologyAll rights reserved © 2020

22

Osteochondral tissue

Matrix stiffness

2000 kPa

100 kPa

Cell density

24 ∙ 106 cells/mL

7 ∙ 106 cells/mL

Schinagl et al. 1997 , Hunziker et al. 2002

PRG-4

CILP

COMP

Superficial

zone (A)

Middle (B)

Zone

Deep zone (C)

Calcified

cartilage

Subchondral (D)

bone

Compressive modulus 380 kPa

10 million cells/mL

All rights reserved © 2020 Faculty of Engineering Technology

Faculty of Engineering Technology23

Bioprinting for osteochondral regeneration

All rights reserved © 2020Groen et al. 2017 ,

Faculty of Engineering Technology24

Inkjet-based bioprinting of a cartilage construct

All rights reserved © 2020

Modified HP Deskjet 500 thermal inkjet printer

10 % PEGDMA in PBS

0,05 % I-2959

5 x 106 cells/mL human chondrocytes

ᴓ 4 mm x 2 mm

Cui et al , 2012

Faculty of Engineering Technology25 All rights reserved © 2020

Lower cytotoxicity: cell viability 89% vs 63%

Maintained position and phenotype

Distribution of fluorescently labeled chondrocytes in PEG

Scalebar = 100µm

Safranin-O staining after 6 weeks in chondrogenic medium.

Scale bar = 200µm

Construct printed in mold

Scalebar = 2 mm

• Simultaneous photopolymerisation

• Printed in bovine osteochondral plugs more GAG/DNA than without plug

Cui et al , 2012

Multilayered constructs containing human MSCs for osteochondral tissue regeneration in rabbits

In-house built extrusion bioprinter

PCL

4 % alginate OR 5% CB[6]DAH-HA in DMEM

3% atelocollagen in DMEM

2 or 1 x106 cells/mL human MSCs

100 ng/mL TGF-β or 5 µg/mL rhBMP-2

ᴓ 5 x 5 mm

26 Shim et al , 2016 Faculty of Engineering TechnologyAll rights reserved © 2020

4 experimental groups, cultured in DMEM for 24h, then 8 weeks in vivo

All rights reserved © 2020 Faculty of Engineering Technology

• Cell viability after printing atelocollagen

CB[6]/DAH-HA

93%

86%

• Mechanically stabilized atelocollagen gel and new crosslinked HA hydrogel with MSCs and

growth factors promote heterogeneous neotissue formation in vivo

28 Shim et al , 2016 All rights reserved © 2020 Faculty of Engineering Technology

Commercial systems

Organovo – Novogen MMX EnvisionTec – 3D-Bioplotter RegenHu - Biofactory

Cellink Bio-X Allevi (former biobots)

29 All rights reserved © 2020 Faculty of Engineering Technology

Faculty of Engineering Technology30

Biofabrication of spatially organised tissues

All rights reserved © 2020Daly et al , 2019

Faculty of Engineering Technology31 All rights reserved © 2020

32

Melt electrowriting (MEW) for the reinforcement

of hydrogels with 3D printed microfibers

Visser et al , 2015 Faculty of Engineering TechnologyAll rights reserved © 2020

33

Bio-ink development for osteochondral

regeneration: preliminary in-house data3 mm/s 5 mm/s 7 mm/s

145kPa

160kPa

175kPa

chondrocytes

All rights reserved © 2020 Faculty of Engineering Technology

34

Bioprinting for long bone healing

35

Developmentally engineered callus organoid

bioassemblies for long bone healing

All rights reserved © 2020 Faculty of Engineering TechnologyNilsson-Hall et al , 2019

36

3D printing as a route for upscaling?

McMaster et al , 2019

Arai et al , 2018

The “Kenzan” method

Sheet-like tissue constructs

from spheroids and MEW-scaffolds

All rights reserved © 2020 Faculty of Engineering Technology

Faculty of Engineering Technology37

From bioprinting to biofabrication

All rights reserved © 2020

‘the automated generation of biologically functional products with structural organization

from living cells, bioactive molecules, biomaterials, cell aggregates such as micro-tissues,

or hybrid cell-material constructs, through bioprinting or bioassembly and subsequent

tissue maturation processes’

Moroni et al , 2018

38

BIOFABRICATION

BIOASSEMBLY BIOPRINTING

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015

Cell

aggregates

micro-tissues

Hybrid cell-material

constructs

Single cells

(living materials)(cell-driven

self-organization)

Faculty of Engineering Technology39

In summary

All rights reserved © 2020

Traditional TE

needed…

- Scaling up

- Anatomically accurate

and mechanically

functional implants upon

implantation

- A robust and controllable

process that diminishes

variability in the biological

outcome

- Personalised approach

- The gradient deposition

of cells, proteins,

materials…

- An automated,

controlled process from

design to fabrication

allowing scale up

- Combined technologies

that have shown

potential to develop

improved constructs

- Vascularisation

- Material optimisation to

increase shape fidelity

- Complex architectures

- Post-fabrication

processing

- Regulatory and ethical

challenges

- …

Biofabrication

technologies offer…

Challenges still

remain…

Faculty of Engineering Technology40

State-of-the-art and future perspectives

All rights reserved © 2020

?

Possible applications

Ozbolat, I.T. et al. , 2016 41 All rights reserved © 2020 Faculty of Engineering Technology

THANK YOU

Veerle.Bloemen@kuleuven.be