Post on 28-Feb-2022
PurposeTo come together with partners to begin to talk about improving bus service in LA City.
To anchor this effort in community organizations that have members ride the bus.
To support existing efforts now, and learn from past efforts to support and advocate with bus riders.
ObjectivesSharing perspectives and updates on the status of transit in LA Region
Sharing ideas and visions on what would better bus service look like/could look like in LA
Lifting up existing efforts and experiences and transit improvement organizing
Discussing opportunities for advocacy and change
ProcessBuilding off Just Growth Meeting work group meetings and NextGen efforts
Feedback and ongoing discussions with ACT-LA and other partner organizations
Meeting with Metro Staff and City of LA staff2
Topic Item
EVERYONE Introductions around the room
PRESENTATIONS
Weclome
Transit in LA Region - trends, challenges, opportunities
Power of Community Organizations
BREAK OUT GROUPS Breaking into 3 groups
DISCUSSION Report backs from group break outs
NEXT STEPS What’s next and other spaces to engage
3
L.A. Metro riders ditching the bus
Source: Metro | Los Angeles TImes(Jon Schleuss / Los Angeles Times)
7
Metro 101 :: Projects :: 10
10
Study will look at how pricing can reduce congestion, improve equity, and cut emissions:
•
Governor's Appointee,
Metro 101 :: Politics ::13
Kuehl
Bulinski
Barger
Solis Ridley Thomas
XM�ESLN�2RJS\
Hahn
�]^�ESLN�2RJS\
Bonin Krekorian
XM�ESLN�2RJS\
Garcetti Dupont- Walker
Najarian Butts
2RJS\
Fasana Garcia
=>=̐E>C8=6
13
14
KrekorianCD 2
Cedillo CD 1
Blumenfeld CD 3
RyuCD 4
KoretzCD 5
MartinezCD 6
RodriguezCD 7
Harris-DawsonCD 8
GarcettiMayor
PriceCD 9
WessonCD 10Council President
Bonin CD 11
LeeCD 12
CD 13 O’Farrell
CD 14Huizar
23���1_]LJSXY
Working Group - Metro + LA City
Directive Metro and municipal buses operate on streets controlled by the City of Los Angeles and neighboring cities. Therefore, City agencies have a critical role to play in ensuring that residents and commuters have access to fast, frequent, and reliable bus service. Close coordination between Metro, LADOT, and the Public Works bureaus is essential to successfully implement infrastructure changes.
Outcomes To report back with a list of priority bus-supportive infrastructure projects needed to support the NextGen bus service plan, with an emphasis on near-term improvements that can be implemented concurrently with each phase of NextGen.
Key CriteriaIdentify 7-10 key corridors where Metro Buses are tied up in traffic by October 2019
.
16
Working Group - Metro + LA City
What is Bus Supportive Infrastructure
Bus only lanes, que jumpers, signal priority, or boarding islands, all door boarding. It is estimated that these types of infrastructure improvements can cut stop times and improve bus speeds by 20% or more.
Locations? Likely bus routes North and South of Downtown Los
Angeles.
Council Districts: 1, 8, 9, 13 and 14
17
What would be helpful for you in these meetings? Especially for community organizations/advocates - how could work group meetings like this best support your work?
How is this space a resource for organizers who support better transit options in the LA Region?
What changes would make a trip easier? What streets do you see as key for significant bus improvements? What neighborhoods?
Thoughts from people in the group who work in at a public agency or political office?
Anything else that comes up in your small breakout you want to share?
Better Buses for LA Work Group Meeting Friday Sept 20th 9 - 10:30am
California Endowment, Sierra Room 1000 Alameda Street, LA 90012 Meeting Contact: jessica@investinginplace.org or 213-210-8136
Purpose
● To come together with partners to begin to talk about improving bus service in LA City.
● To anchor this effort in community organizations that have members who ride the bus.
● To support existing efforts now, and learn from past efforts to support and advocate with bus riders.
Objectives ● Sharing perspectives and updates on the status of transit in LA Region ● Sharing ideas and visions on what would better bus service look like/could look
like in LA ● Lifting up existing efforts and experiences and transit improvement organizing ● Discussing opportunities for advocacy and change
○ City of LA/Metro Bus Working Group ○ Focusing on key priority areas in LA Council Districts 1,8,9,13,14
■ Corridors and busways that could benefit from significant bus improvements (lots of ridership, where we can increase frequency, multiple transit agencies)
■ Identifying key community organizations in these districts ○ Discussing what would make future work group meetings helpful to
community partners
Process ● Building off Just Growth Meeting work group meetings and NextGen efforts ● Feedback and on-going discussions with ACT-LA and other partner organizations ● Meeting with Metro Staff and City of LA staff
Agenda 8:30am - 9am Room open and coffee/breakfast available 9am - 9:05am Introductions around the room (Facilitator: Jessica) 9:10am - 9:15am Welcome by Hector Huezo, Jobs to Move America 9:15am - 9:25am Overview of transit in LA County: issues, opportunities, Jessica Meaney, Investing in Place 9:25am - 9:30am Importance of Bus Riders and Community Organizers, Scarlett de Leon, ACT-LA 9:30am - 9:55am Group break outs/discussions
Breaking into 3 groups - supported by Hector, Jessica and Scarlett Small group discussion questions:
● What would be helpful for you in these meetings? Especially for community organizations/advocates - how could work group meetings like this best support your work? How is this space a resource for organizers who support better transit options in the LA Region?
● What changes would make a trip easier? What streets do you see as key for significant bus improvements? What neighborhoods?
● Thoughts from people in the group who work in at a public agency or political office?
● Anything else that comes up in your small breakout you want to share? 9:55am - 10:10am Group Report Backs (Facilitator Hector) 10:15am - 10:30am Next steps (Facilitator Jessica)
List of RSVP's - Alphabetical by first name
Full Name Organization
Alex Freedman
Alfonso Directo
Alice Ziesing
Alysia Humm Metro
Amanda Staples American Heart Association
Ana-Alicia Carr American Heart Association
Areli Morales LA County Bicycle Coalition
Barbara Lott-Holland Labor Community Strategy Center
Bart Reed The Transit Coalition
Ben Russak Liberty Hill Foundation
Bryn Lindblad Climate Resolve
Carmina Calderon East LA Community Corporation
Caroline Torén Refolda
Carter Rubin NRDC
Cassie Halls Metro
corina martinez Alta Med
Dan Brotman Glendale Environmental Coalition
Daniel Rodman City of Los Angeles - Office of Mayor Eric Garcetti
Daniel Stoilov Bicycle Transit
Dorothy Wong Altadena Town Council
Doug Mensman City of Los Angeles - Office of Councilmember Paul Krekorian
Edith Vega City of Los Angeles - Office of Mayor Eric Garcetti
Eli Lipmen Move LA
Elise Kalfayan Sunroom Desk
Elizabeth Medrano WORKS
Eric Bruins City of Los Angeles - Office of Councilmember Mike Bonin
Erica Freeman West Angeles CDC
Ernesto Hidalgo Civic Impact Group
Francesca de la rosa WORKS
Gloria Ohland Move LA
Gregory Wright Wright Thinking
Hector Gutierrez First 5 LA
Hector Huezo Jobs to Move America
Hunter Baoengstrum Santa Monica College
Jasneet Bains Prevention Institute
Jenna Chandler Curbed LA
Jennifer A. Gill LABAC - Vice Chair
Jessica Cruz Transit Center
Jessica Meaney Investing in Place
Joe Linton Streetsblog L.A.
Joe Viana
John Yi Los Angeles Walks
Jonathan Matz Atwater Village Neighborhood Council
Jordan Fraade City of Los Angeles - Planning
Julia Salinas City of Los Angeles - Office of Mayor Eric Garcetti
Kalieh Honish Metro
Karina Macias City of Los Angeles - Office of Mayor Eric Garcetti
Laura Raymond ACT-LA
Lisa Sy
Luis Cabrales Inquilinos Unidos
Ma'ayan Dembo UCLA masters student
Madeline Brozen UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Margarita Lopez-Pelayo Pacoima Beautiful
Max Podemski First 5 LA
Mehmet Berker Los Angeles Walks
Ms. C. Cleo Ray Disabled Advocate
Norman Emerson Emerson & Associates
Sandra Romero LISC LA
Scarlett De Leon ACT-LA
Shady Mallory Meaningful Goal Housing Shelter
Stacy Weisfeld City of Los Angeles - Office of Mayor Eric Garcetti
Thomas Yee LA Thrives
Tulsi Patel Estolano Advisors
UN Women USA LA UN Women USA LA
Wajenda Chambeshi City of Los Angeles - Great Streets
Break out group notes: Report back - full group discussion:
- Desire for Metro 101 Advocacy trainings - What does success/failure in advocacy look like - Service increased doing non-peak hours - Increase in 700 level buses - Bus only lanes - painted red - Mapping areas where improvement going - Language justice - holding work group meeting in multiple languages - Education on how to use Metro - navigate buses - Communication strategies - cultural shift
- Messengers - Experiential Advocacy
- Councilmembers ride the bus + community + media - Organizing on the buses
Scarlett’s group notes: Specific opp - in Districts - who can we engage?
- $$ Foundations, outside of City + gov - Language Justice - US also go to org membership mtgs, political education - Include City Family Source centers - News/updates on BRT areas - Case studies (talking points) - Can Metro have a ride/tour on BRT lived experience - Outreach to work source centers
Bus Lanes
- Metro construction blocking Metro Bus - Metro’s: How Women Travel Survey (safety) - Vermont ! - 30 bus on 1st street (ELACC members) - 751 Vernon - Need frequent stops - Integration of bus services LA DOT/Metro - Reliable Transportation - Get more info from Metro on these topics. What are they doing? How can we
help?
- App with real time - including transfers - Studies real in time = increase in safety - Safety + company = not always need enforcement but someone - An app or someplace where you can get info on everything you need to know
about your trip - Family Source Center - Integrated service where community members can report
issues - Bring integration ideas to work gorup City + Metro - 2 BRT lines have centered on white affluent communities - organize around these
projects - A lot of misinformation on BRT language to talk about this. Info on SB50
Hector’s group notes: What’s helpful in these meetings:
- $7.2 billion budget - goes public 3 weeks before Metro Board adopts - impossible to engage as stakeholders
- Overemphasis on infrastructure/capital - lack of focus on providing quality service - Focused messaging on “service” - Decision points/timelines - How corridors selected - How we measure success - Folks who don’t talk/work on transportation but are affected - Including EJ groups/enviro intersections - Service Job Opportunities - Understanding who opposition iis/wht - Less reactive campaign/messaging - Clarity around what we want/deserve - strengths/weaknesses with this group - Power mapping the decision makers + staff - Parse out our demands - Identifying board champions - Keeping up the momentum
What changes, trips,communities:
- Increase service not just at peak hours - Network vs single corridors - Downtown lines that speed up other routes - E/W 700 routes
- Increase focus on North/South Travel - Ensuring bus only lane use/red paint - Metro’s equity focused communities - Bus lanes of highways - Shoulder driving for buses - Amenities that make metro a comfortable ride - Service for specific facilities (ie hospitals, parks)
Jessica’s group notes: Strategies to engage
- Engage on the bus and at stops - Pop up events - going to people - Attending other organizing spaces - going to other groups instead of asking them
to come here - Schools, Women + children, youth, universities and the success of the
U-Pass - Need for communication strategies - who are the messengers? What about the
backlash on loss of car lanes/fear of change - of traffic getting worse if you are driving
- Experiential advocacy - policy maker ride alongs on the bus. And/or challenge - can an elected official make the trip one of their constituents on a bus makes - ie mom getting kids to school and to work.
- Map area of key corridors - identify assets, organizations, schools, stakeholders that influence
- Education - how to use the bus/the system