Post on 17-Jul-2020
‚Living along gradients‘
Doctoral defense Rebecca Störmer 1
Hamburg, 18.01.2013
Benthic bacteria in the German Bight: Characterising community structure and influencing environmental factors
or
Introduction
Methods
Results
Spatiotemporal variations of benthic bacterial communities in the German Bight
Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
Conclusions
Future perspectives
2
Outline
Motivation: Ocean dumping
• deposition of waste at sea
• waste includes:
– liquid wastes (dilute acid, sludge)
– construction waste
– dredged material (harbours, rivers)
3
geo.de
Introduction
climateforce.net fr.wikipedia.org presstv.ir
www.greenpeace.org
Threat for ecosystems
Motivation: Ocean dumping
4
Introduction
climateforce.net fr.wikipedia.org presstv.ir
www.greenpeace.org
Overview of the number and distribution of dumpsites within the OSPAR area
OSPAR 2009b
5
since 2005: ~ 6 mio m³ 3 m high rising containing mainly sand
Introduction
fr.wikipedia.org
HPA Report 2010
sediment origin
dumping site
6
Introduction
Motivation
• monitoring focuses on macrozoobenthic communities and flatfishes
• “Progress on investigating biological responses to the disposal of dredged material has been slow in OSPAR and more effort is needed for a wider and more systematic application of bioassays in the testing of dredged sediments.“ (OSPAR 2009b)
• bacterial community structure affected by
– physical disturbance (Findlay et al 1990)
– heavy metal and oil contamination (Gremion et al 2004, dos Santos et al 2011)
www.bgisequence.com
7
Introduction
Motivation
• benthic bacterial communities:
– largest variety of metabolic types
– heterotrophic, phototrophic and lithotrophic bacteria
– highly abundant: 108 - 1011 cells per ml
www.bgisequence.com
Problem: sublittoral benthic bacterial communities uncharacterised in the German Bight
Are bacterial community analyses a useful supplement for monitoring programs at dumping sites?
8
Introduction
German Bight
• hydrographic regime pre- dominantely influenced by discharges of Elbe and Weser River
• most euthrophied region in the North Sea
• shallow part of the North Sea with max. dephts ~ 50 m
• Helgoland
Elbe
Weser Jade
Sediments in the German Bight
• Grain size fractions
– Clay particles < 4 µm
– Silt particles 4 - 63 µm
– Fine sand particles 63 – 200 µm
– Medium sand particles 200 – 630 µm
– Coarse sand particles 630 – 2000 µm
– Gravel particles 2000 – 6000 µm
• Proportion of each grain size fraction determines the classification into sandy or muddy sediments
9
Introduction
Sediments in the German Bight
10
Introduction
www.bfn.de
noaa.gov 11
Introduction
Spatial gradients Temporal gradients
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Oct Dec
Te
mp
era
ture
(°C
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Environmental gradients
Characterising sublittoral benthic bacterial communities
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities in the German Bight
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
a) Community structure
b) Community function
12
Research aims
• Bacterial community analysis
– ARISA fingerprinting
– 16S pyrosequencing
– functional gene arrays
• Environmental data (additional data provided by Prof. Karen Wiltshire and HPA)
– CHN analysis
– particle size analysis
• Statistical analysis
– univariate and multivariate statistics
– Geostatistics
13
Methods
Data analysis
Characterising sublittoral benthic bacterial communities
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities in the German Bight
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
a) Community structure
b) Community function
14
Research aims
Results
• monthly sampling from September 2010 to August 2011
• three replicates for bacterial community analysis (ARISA)
• environmental data includes:
– temperature
– salinity
– chl a
– CHN
– particle size of the sediments
15
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities
offshore transect
nearshore transects
16
Results
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities
Transect I Offshore Transect II Nearshore
P8 II P8 III P8 IV P8 V P8 VI
Fin
e s
an
d (
%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Elbe II E3Elbe III
Elbe IV Elbe VElbe VI
Fin
e s
an
d (
%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Stable environmental conditions offshore vs
variable environmental conditions nearshore
17
Results
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities
Results
Fingerprinting via Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA)
Ribosomal Operon of Bacteria
ITS
16S 23S
Infrared labeled tag
Conversion of community profiles into numeric data
Community profiles
18
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities
Variable Pseudo-F P
Proportion of
variance Variable Pseudo-F P
Proportion of
variance
Coarse gravel 0 1 0.000 Temperature 47,382 0.0001 0.114
Medium gravel 0 1 0.000 Fine sand 30,272 0.0001 0.069
Fine gravel 0 1 0.000 Chlorophyll a 20,515 0.0016 0.045
Coarse sand 15,685 0.0425 0.041 Salinity 16,793 0.0132 0.036
Medium sand 2,362 0.0021 0.060 Hydrogen 13,296 0.1106 0.029
Fine sand 26,317 0.0007 0.066 Coarse silt 11,434 0.2703 0.024
Coarse silt 26,109 0.0012 0.066 Medium sand 12,879 0.1348 0.027
Medium silt 25,044 0.001 0.063 Coarse sand 10,608 0.3847 0.022
Fine silt 23,395 0.0024 0.060 Fine silt 0.92303 0.5777 0.020
Clay 22,599 0.0035 0.058 Medium silt 12,812 0.1628 0.027
Temperature 47,382 0.0001 0.114 Clay 10,797 0.3552 0.023
Salinity 24,043 0.0007 0.061 Nitrogen 0.77095 0.7846 0.016
Nitrogen 16,197 0.0468 0.042 TOC 0.67199 0.8882 0.014
TOC 17,895 0.0219 0.046
Hydrogen 19,452 0.0106 0.050
Chlorophyll a 38,587 0.0001 0.09419
Results
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities
Distance based multivariate multiple regression model (DISTLM)
p < 0.01
Marginal test Sequential test
Results
20 -40 -20 0 20 40
dbRDA1 (29.9% of fitted, 13.9% of total variation)
-40
-20
0
20
40
d b R
D A
2 (
1 9 . 9
% o
f f i t t e
d , 9
. 3 %
o f t o
t a l v a r i
a t i o n )
Resemblance: S7 Jaccard
Site Elbe II
E3
Elbe III
Elbe IV
Elbe VI
Elbe V
Temperature
Fine sand
Chl a
Salinity Hydrogen
Coarse silt
Medium sand
Coarse sand Fine silt
Medium silt
Clay
Nitrogen
Carbon
Near estuary community
-40 -20 0 20 40
dbRDA1 (29.9% of fitted, 13.9% of total variation)
-40
-20
0
20
40
d b R
D A
2 (
1 9 . 9
% o
f f i
t t e
d , 9
. 3 %
o f t o
t a l v a r i
a t i o n )
Resemblance: S7 Jaccard
Month
April
December
February
January
June
March
May
October
Temperature
Fine sand
Chl a
Salinity
Hydrogen
Coarse silt
Medium sand
Coarse sand Fine silt
Medium silt
Clay
Nitrogen
Carbon
Early summer to autumn community
Winter to spring community
Spatial
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities
Nearshore bacterial communities exhibit strong spatiotemporal variations
Marine community
marine
estuarine
distance-based Redundancy analysis
Temporal
Results
21
Elbe
II E3
Elbe
III
Elbe
IV
Elbe
V
Elbe
VI
AR
ISA
OT
Us
0
20
40
60
80
Janu
ary
Febru
ary
Mar
chApr
ilM
ay
June
Octob
er
Dec
embe
r
AR
ISA
OT
Us
0
20
40
60
80
Spatial Temporal
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities
* * p < 0.05
Diversity of bacterial communities in nearshore habitats affected by temporal variations
Distribution of operational taxonomic units (OTUs)
OTUs defined according to ITS fragment lenghts
Main findings
• amplitude of environmental gradients determines the bacterial community structure
• temporal variations affect bacterial community structure and diversity
22
Results
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities
Characterising sublittoral benthic bacterial communities
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities in the German Bight
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
a) Community structure
b) Community function
23
Research aims
Results
24
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
Results
25
2 months 9 months 4 months 2 months
08/08 - 10/08 08/09 12/09 – 02/10 04/10 08/10
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
Timeline sampling campaigns
Dumping campaigns
Sampling campaigns
Results
• sampling campaigns in August 2009 and April and August 2010
• each campaign comprises 125 sampling sites
• three replicates for bacterial community analysis (ARISA)
26
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
Grain size fractions Sum Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)
< 20µm alphaHCH
20-63µm betaHCH
63-100µm gammaHCH
100-200µm deltaHCH
200-630µm
630-1000µm Sum Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDT) and metabolites
1000-2000µm ppDDE
opDDD
S, N, P, C ppDDD
TOC (C) opDDT
nitrogen (N) ppDDT
sulphur (S)
phosphor (P) Sum Organotin Compounds
monobutyltin (MBT)
Hydrocarbons dibutyltin (DBT)
tributyltin (TBT)
Sum Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) tetrabutyltin
naphthaline
fluorene Heavy Metals
phenanthrene arsenic
anthracene lead
fluoranthene cadmium
pyrene chrome
benz(a)anthracene copper
chrysene nickel
benzo(b)fluoranthene mercury
benzo(k)fluoranthene zinc
benzo(a)pyrene
dibenz(ah)anthracene
benzo(ghi)perylene
indeno(1.2.3cd)pyrene
Sum Chlorinated Diphenyls (PCB)
PCB28
PCB52
PCB101
PCB118
PCB138
PCB153
PCB180
Contextual data
Results
27
Grain size fractions Sum Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)
< 20µm alphaHCH
20-63µm betaHCH
63-100µm gammaHCH
100-200µm deltaHCH
200-630µm
630-1000µm Sum Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDT) and metabolites
1000-2000µm ppDDE
opDDD
S, N, P, C ppDDD
TOC (C) opDDT
nitrogen (N) ppDDT
sulphur (S)
phosphor (P) Sum Organotin Compounds
monobutyltin (MBT)
Hydrocarbons dibutyltin (DBT)
tributyltin (TBT)
Sum Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) tetrabutyltin
naphthaline
fluorene Heavy Metals
phenanthrene arsenic
anthracene lead
fluoranthene cadmium
pyrene chrome
benz(a)anthracene copper
chrysene nickel
benzo(b)fluoranthene mercury
benzo(k)fluoranthene zinc
benzo(a)pyrene
dibenz(ah)anthracene
benzo(ghi)perylene
indeno(1.2.3cd)pyrene
Sum Chlorinated Diphenyls (PCB)
PCB28
PCB52
PCB101
PCB118
PCB138
PCB153
PCB180
Contextual data
Results
28 -0.8 0.8
-0.6
0.8
TOC 20 – 63 µm
100 – 200 µm
200 – 630 µm
630 - 1000 µm
1000 – 2000 µm
nitrogen
sulfur phosphor
hydrocarbons
Sum PAH
PCBSum
Sum HCH
Sum DDX
Sum organotin compounds
cadmium
chrome
copper mercury
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
Biplot Redundancy analysis August 2009
Dumping site
Surrounding
Transects
Reference
10.1 % of variance
7 %
of
vari
ance
Bacterial communities at the dumping site significantly affected by fine sand (100 – 200 µm) and organic pollutants
Results
29
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
1.5km (surrounding1)
dumping centre
3km_2 (surrounding 5)
3km_1 (surrounding 4)
2km_ (surrounding 3)
2km_1 (surrounding 2)
reference 1 reference 2
• based on significant differences (analysis of similarities) in the communitity structure nine representative samples were selected
• via pyrosequencing the V1-V5 region of the 16S rDNA was sequenced
Elbe
dumpin
g cen
tre
surroundin
g 1
surroundin
g 2
surroundin
g 3
surroundin
g 4
surroundin
g 5
refe
rence
1
refe
rence
2
No.
454 O
TU
s
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Results
30
Singletons (n=1) were removed prior to the analysis OTUs = sequence similarity > 97 %
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
Distribution of operational taxonomic units (OTUs)
lowest diversity was observed in Elbe and at dumping centre
Results
31
Elbe
dumpin
g cen
tre
surroundin
g 1
surroundin
g 2
surroundin
g 3
surroundin
g 4
surroundin
g 5
refe
rence
1
refe
rence
2
No
. s
eq
ue
nc
es
0
100
200
300
400
500
Flavobacteriaceae
Flavobacteriales unclassified
singletons (n=1) were removed prior to the analysis
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
Flavobacteriales
considerable higher abundance of Flavobacteriaceae at the dumping centre indication for organic pollution?
Results
32
Elb
e
dumpin
g cen
tre
surroundin
g 1
surroundin
g 2
surroundin
g 3
surroundin
g 4
surroundin
g 5
refe
rence
1
refe
rence
2
No
. s
eq
ue
nc
es
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Alcaligenaceae
Betaproteobacteria unclassified
Burkholderiales unclassified
Burkholderiales_incertae_sedis
Comamonadaceae
Hydrogenophilaceae
Methylophilaceae
Rhodocyclaceae
singletons (n=1) were removed prior to the analysis
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
Betaproteobacteria
typical freshwater groups still detectable nine months after dumping activity
Results
33
Elbe
dumpin
g cen
tre
surroundin
g 1
surroundin
g 2
surroundin
g 3
surroundin
g 4
surroundin
g 5
refe
rence
1
refe
rence
2
No.
sequences
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500 Cystobacteraceae
Deltaproteobacteria unclassified
Desulfobacteraceae
Desulfobacterales unclassified
Desulfobulbaceae
Desulfuromonadaceae
Desulfuromonadales unclassified
Geobacteraceae
Myxococcales unclassified
Polyangiaceae
Syntrophaceae
Syntrophobacteraceae
Syntrophobacterales unclassified
Syntrophorhabdaceae
singletons (n=1) were removed prior to the analysis
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
Deltaproteobacteria
considerable higher numbers of Desulfuromonadaceaea and lower numbers of Desulfurobacteraceae
indication for organic pollution?
Characterising sublittoral benthic bacterial communities
I: Spatiotemporal variations influencing benthic bacterial communities in the German Bight
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
a) Community structure
b) Community function
34
Research aims
Results
35
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
1.5km (surrounding1)
dumping centre
3km_2 (surrounding 5)
3km_1 (surrounding 4)
2km_ (surrounding 3)
2km_1 (surrounding 2)
reference 1 reference 2
Results
• GeoChip 4.2 (functional gene array) (He et al 2007, Lu et al 2012)
• contains 103 666 probes encoding for functional genes involved in biogeochemical key processes
• genes are categorised according to these processes e.g. sulphur cycling, heavy metal resistance, organic remediation
36
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
GeoChip analysis
Results
37
Elbe a
Elbe b
Elbe c
dumpin
g centre
a
dumpin
g cente
r b
dumpin
g centre
c
1.5 k
m a
1.5 k
m b
1.5 k
m c
2 km
_1 a
2 km
_1 b
2 km
_1 c
2 km
_2 a
2 km
_2 b
2 km
_2 c
3 km
_1 a
3 km
_1 b
3 km
_1 c
3 km
_2 a
3 km
_2 b
3 km
_2 c
refe
rence
_1 a
refe
rence
_1 b
refe
rence
_1 c
refe
rence
_2 a
refe
rence
_2 b
refe
rence
_2 c
% o
f to
tal g
en
es
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Distribution of functional genes of the gene category „organic remediation“
p < 0.05
*
*
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
significantly lower functional diversity at the dumping centre as compared with the reference sites
Results
38 a b c d
I
II
III
genes
Hierachical clustering based on Euclidean distance for the gene category „organic remediation“
Elbe
Dumping site
Reference
II: Impact of ocean dumping on benthic bacterial communities
sam
ple
s
Results
Main findings
• similar results for all gene categories
• no accumulation of genes involved in pollution related processes at the dumping centre detectable
• significant lower functional diversity at the dumping centre
• differences among detected gene groups based on phylogenetic background
39
Conclusions
• most pronounced environmental gradients affect the bacterial community structure significantly
• bacterial community structure at the dumping site was significantly influenced by the dumping activity
– lower alpha and functional diversity
– mix-community containing fresh water and adapted marine bacteria
• bacterial community analysis represent a useful supplement for monitoring programs
• But: further elaboration is needed!!
40
Main conclusions
Future perspectives
• deepening the knowledge about benthic bacterial communities in the German Bight
– identifiying community composition and function „Metagenomic approaches“
– simultaneous investigation of pelagic and benthic bacteria „Benthopelagic coupling“
• adaptation of monitoring conditions and experimental set up for the inclusion of bacterial community analysis
– controlled experiments focusing on the impact of relevant pollutants on the bacterial communities
– identifying indicator organisms
– inclusion of physicochemical parameters such as pH, oxygen penetration, bioavailability of pollutants
41
42
Acknowledgement This research was only possible with the help of all of you!!! Many thanks to: Dr. Antje Wichels and Dr. Gunnar Gerdts My committee: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Streit, PD Dr. Andreas Pommerening, Prof. Dr. Friedrich Buchholz and Jun. Prof. Dr. Mirjam Perner Hamburg Port Authority (Dr. Maja Karrasch und Rolf Lüschow) MLUR NLWKN BafG POLMAR graduate school Prof. Dr. Karen Wiltshire Dr. Jörg Peplies Dr. Christian Hass Julia Haafke and Bettina Oppermann Kristine Carstens and Sylvia Peters Mathis van Ahnen all my colleagues and friends at the BAH