Post on 18-May-2022
APPENDIX GSlug Test Results
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LD-1
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
50.42 feet11 feet10 feet100 feet0.22 feet
30ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.6098 B=
4 inches8 inches
39.42 feet
0.3333 feet
2.50.4
ttfXiixwv ff- tvtmtMsuRiftJS'u tiiis ''' '' ll llllilPil illtSI I-l l:Bouwer and Rice Method
Regression line: r squared = 0.9941
Hydraulic conductivity = 41.08 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________4.5 feet
. ,; ; ..-. .;. .;.'. ; . ,;. .; ; •.;.;.; •.;,; ;., ; y>:.vv .v ,., ••• •;•:>.•;•:•:•:•;•.•:•'•;•:•:• •:•: : > ]';•.•;•:';';•:':•;•'':•:•;•;•: , ,... •••.• •••'•• ;• •:•,•' ••, *t: • • • . • . < • . « • •»:•' •,. •'•*'• •*•"*• •;•' •• • • '• '."t'-j1-1' •• '•• ':'-'-'- • • • •'•'• • • : •'• ;' •'• '•;• • •,•'« • •'•'• ••••; • • ' ' • '• -'•''•• ••••'• '••••.•.'. . , .•'•. .',;.•. : •. .•. . ,•,•.•. •.'.•- ,•.'.' , .•, . ,',•,•.'. -..•;; >:•.>.>. ,':::i::: :mm:mmm mx10
1
ST3au53£ "-1ubOedS 0.01
0.001 cm
*te°° 8 ^^ -.
0
B data
1
* "" J3"~ B
^ ^
J
Time (min)points regression
iH"--- B
B
1 IS
line
ftR3QUl3l
</) Qfli IH l!
fl3 0 >^Oc "E
(133dO QV3H NI HONVHD
oo
cC
P
P<•HP
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #2Monitor Well LD-1
• •:•••' ::!llii::::!;?ll|£ilf|flllli
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
50.42 feet11 feet10 feet100 feet0.22 feet
30ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.6098 B=
^ ^ ^ ^ ff MvMK i
4 inches8 inches
39.42 feet
0.3333 feet
2.50.4
Hydraulic conductivity = 40.54 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =_________4.5 feet
•'.•'• '•jft. .''•:•;•!•.•: . .• •'•i* •;•: 'v, •,•*,•.•»*' :•:• •'• ;• • •,•,«,, •. ,•: ;
10
iF
"S
<u00CO
0.00102 0.4 _0.6 , . . 0.8 1 \2 1.4Time (mm)
a data points _ regression line
CM
*- 1W QQ) I
H ±
c cw o? 2
T
(XH3d) QV3H MI 3ONVHD
«0en
>n
0P
P*
P0c•<H-P
ino
«n H in o inT-3 o o
\
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test #1Monitor Well LD-1
!;$:?;!:fS
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
S S®»;:;;:;;:;-;:;g:;;
50.42 feet11 feet10 feet100 feet0.22 feet
30ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.6098 B=
ilitl$:S; ^
4 inches8 inches
39.42 feet
0.3333 feet
2.50.4
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
_ Effective radial distance• of slug test =
MSSSS lJ' otilS Si ' ^B&i'SSSS:'® ^
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9972
37.48 ft/day
4.5 feet
0.001ISTime (mm)
B data points _ regression line
AR30M35
4- Iwo>
CD *-*.£ css O
(133d) QV3H MI 3OMVHO
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test #2Monitor Well LD-1
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
50.42 feet11 feet10 feet100 feet0.22 feet
30ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.6098 B=
4 inches8 inches
39.42 feet
0.3333 feet
2.50.4
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =
Hydraulic conductivity = . 52.71 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =_________4.5 feet
10
CD1
ubflaa 0.16
0.0102 0.4 _. , 0.6. . 0 . 8 1 12Time (mm)
H data points _ regression line
RR30U13-7
* *-
<DI •_D) 4-1.EC= Oec SLL
a
c(2C/
(133d) QV3H MI 39MVH3
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-8
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
59.86 feet8.88 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9964 B=
8s;.K®s::;ss! ; S> ^;??:";SfffX}! S W!l:
2 inches6 inches
50.98 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
:;:i$|:;l
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.8923
241 .05 ft/day
5.0 feet
0.0010.4 _. f 0.6. N 0.8 1 12Time (mm)
data points _ regression line
AR30M39
0PCO - *
«- I$ w•o "55
(X33d) QV3H MI 3OMVHD
inc-i
:
a Ic c
inC3
in co »n T—i in o in<N rJ o CJ
I
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-8
vxMtwVmmwmmmmmTotal well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where l_e/rw=
59.86 feet8.88 feet10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9964 B=
2 inches6 inches
50.98 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity = 108.38 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =_________5.0 feet
10
«X— '1§<uffic o-1**m
D60Ca6 0.01 '
0.001 c•
\\B
\ G3
• B \ B (9 1
\i B a B a i
B
OJ
a data
1 B D
SB B B
1 B !
B B B] 8
rri- / 1.5. \ 3Time (mm)points regression1 w1
I
1 i
2^ 3
line
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHD
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test # 1Monitor Well LS-8
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
59.86 feet8.88 feet10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9964 B=
i ill iRZ PII ti ill l ffi
2 inches6 inches
50.98 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^ Effective radial distance^ fc of slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9179
120.90 ft/day
5.0 feet
. • . • , , , : , I-:,'1 . '.''/:•', /.': ,' vX'.v. . ,•:•'•:•.''•'•: :•:•:•;•:•;•'•'•'•:•;•; :•; ;•:•;•;'' ••: ;•:•; ; ;•• : •;• • • ;•:•:•: :•;•; :•»;•:•:•;•, vx;vX !»'v' : '•'•.•'-' • •• ;•'•; •• x-x-r*:'\-«M- •••• , •/ 'v;*V':'' ',','', ;•:•: . ••• '•'•; • ; '•••,'.•!•'''• • •: '•••;• • ; • ' '•;•;• ' ';•;•' ,•'•'•' : ; ' • ' ' '•• •> ; !•'•' • • ' ••'.•.;,; .,..-.,..... _= . . ;,;••• ;;;;"";
10
g '.•oea<Dffi.s "-1OJbt)ca
^ 0.01
0.001 (ft
,1 \
3 fy
TB
\
B 1
IB 13 B B
1 B B
B 8 B 1
TiB data points
B B B B B [
1
me (min)regi
i i ii 3
23 3 3
•ession line
5
AR3GMU3
•*— •W COO J
•o "55
CD
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3
RR30UUU
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-8
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
59.86 feet8.88 feet10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9964 B=
2 inches6 inches
50.98 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =
Hydraulic conductivity = 120.59 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =_________5.0 feet
10
T3eaoffi.£<uGO
o.01
0.001O S 1 _ . . I S . . 2 2 STime (mm)
B data points _ regression line
ftR30Ul»*S
CM* 004- |w rn,23"S
I?OO) 4->.E c= O
(1333) QV3H NI3OMVHO
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-9
';'•.': '.:•;-:? :*i:£;:&J:Vj:$ iff' f-SffflSUKSffffi' :•;•<; f:f •'•:•':•'?, •f- .'fWWffft ¥.:¥.:':; iiSJSSiSSr
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
& S*SSiS*SSSi:*K?®!S?iK?SSSSaB(bI!ia4WW$*M<9mffM3miWfM
83.02 feet10.83 feet
10 feet100 feet0.1 3 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.1780 B=
SiKSS itSSSSSS:::-:; ^ ^¥Ki¥ii¥:¥jf¥SBB:¥5/¥ -1 i;:i¥5;¥<fto
2 inches6 inches
72.19 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
••t J i ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ f
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
_ Effective radial distance^ Bi of slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9884
195. 12 ft/day
6.0 feet
—
10
s~^ is•OCd<UDCc o-1
•f"N
8)§ •6 0.01
0.001 (
A
V
B
B
I
I
B\
\N
) 0.1 J.
B data poin* / • \ °ime (mm)ts regres
B
3 0.4 0.5
sion line
flR30l*U7
CLHEI) oven NI HONVHD
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-9
''•'• :;:|:r* :J: ;:|:;:>;: :;:|:|:|:[:|:f;::|x;;ij:|:;j:;:;:|:;;;::
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
83.02 feet10.83 feet
10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.1780 B=
:;:|:;:::;;;:!:::;:f:
2 inches6 inches
72.19 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity = 287.27 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =_________6.0 feet
•;Jf!£lll
10
i
&"Oaffi
u60cd
^ 0.01
0.001 (
tI 4
B
1 " %
!9 B I
B B B B B B B 1D B B B B B
1 0.5 _1. , . N 1^ 2 2^Time (mm)JM| B data points regression line
CM
to eg0) -J
51c'.E.<2DC
c.E o
CL333) QV3H MI 3OMVHO
RR30**150
0>
CD
.EC= oCOLL
i
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3AR3QM51
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test # 2Monitor Well US-9
1 ':?:v v fiO'.;;:,;.'"':;-.!}''. ' . i.?^ SiJetsifi tibnsi lf f lH j iij: ::, :1::,, •; :;•:"•/• ' -•-,- ••- •.•/..
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
83.02 feet10.83 feet
10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.1780 B=
2 inches6 inches
72.19 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
;: •- ' : .' ;; ;J\V ;:|':t •'•• ;i:, ' M Jr -^--' '-- ------- : - '- ;
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
Effective radial distanceof slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.7062
793.91 ft/day
6.0 feet
• :' I- -.>'•:•'<."'•• . • //' '•r:r;;:;':<:;;::';';:';;:;''<jrapliicar:ResiiIts "••' "'.':. .„.•'!...•. •.'..:•• . - ..10 •
g \•acd<uDCCH
(30cCO
^ 0.01
0.0010
a f a iT
1 S B » « «. 13 B a B S B 1] H B H B H 13 1
OS 1 —. . IS. N 2 2J 3Time (mm)B data points _ regression line
152
I
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test # 1Monitor Well LS-10
• • ••:••:-- •:=? • ••• ••. •• ' ^ ? m WdCl;.Si cM«S :l': : • ." -v >.;,,., ; f / • ' . -
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
59.79 feet8.52 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9989 B=
2 inches6 inches
51 .27 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
Effective radial distanceof slug test =
''-lOiv' ' 'l-'U K»e:ti ] i'C •,•••••.•! '•''•"': ' •'•':•.;'', K-'1'1' ' '• ' ••::: ;; '' :.:' :> .......'..
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9697
231 .97 ft/day
5.0 feet
:;: "•-'•••••• -.'.... '''V;::';'::"^^ ":;;-:-: ••• ' • . .. .
10
g J•oCBuffi.5 0-1ubOcdu OJ)1
0X101 (
1ni BI B1 BI m g Q
)
i o o n n ——
a i
—— a —— D n i
1 B B
TiB data points
B a
me (min) 'repr
!3
IS 3 3.5
•ession line
&R30U15U
(1333) QV3H MI 39MVH3
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-10
, "• : • •: ' • , " ,.••,,•••; '•'; .''!.: •.;';!•••,., '•:•: , '•; .•: ' :•'• !•'•:•'• •.•*w r ' ' '» ' ' t . •'••••' ' ' *.•»•; ;•""!'•"- •' • " • •'" . '•••:•:': •'•... . . . . . . . . . . - - - - . - - - - - -• • - •••••••• ,• m ^ m m , •• •-•• •• ---—•—•• • ••••••• • •- ••Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
59.79 feet8.52 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9989 B=
2 inches6 inches
51 .27 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
ResultsBouwer and Rice Method
Regression line: r squared = 0.8366
Hydraulic conductivity = 186.30 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test = __ ______5.0 feet
Graphical Results
-8-B
B i!
0.001r~ , . ,Time (mm)
B data points _ regression line
2 2S 3 3S
S°
c c«!tt2
CO CN
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHDftR3QM57
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-10
; :"':*:: \Pi; .;.;. ... 'i-lt j:;;:|;:|.: •, - -- :.- v..: ,:u :;,,,,;::-,-:",:::: :-;•; • TVZV
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc~
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
59.79 feet8.52 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9989 B=
2 inches6 inches
51 .27 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
•• • " . ': >fi::;' •',,'•. ':: ^ ^ EW » > ^ 1 : '-•-•-•••- •'-Bouwer and Rice Method
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
Effective radial distanceof slug test =
0.7591
206.08
5.0
ft/day
feet
'Res'nlis
0.0011 —IS .... 2 2S 3 3STime (mm)
B data points _ regression line
£ -•o -5
.E c= oCO 5LL
inCO
ino
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3
AR30M59
«n
.n
GO
3
ino
0)
tco •>o 5O) •*-•.E c= o(0 5LL
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3
in
(.
CPcC<hC
inO
m (si m en^ I CN I
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test # 1Monitor Well LS-13
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
89.75 feet8.09 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.2696 B=
I ^ IS If SI ; ^
2 inches6 inches
81 .66 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =
Hydraulic conductivity = 465.82 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =_________6.6 feet
10
1 i
sg »-iffi,C
8) 0.01ed6
0.001
0.00010
m
1a.8*B
8B
1 1
1
B 8 B 1
T!„ data points
5 , . :me (mm)regr
2S 3 3S
ession line
HR30M61
CO CM T-<
(1333) QV3H MI 39MVHO
in
cP•<Ht
ino
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-13
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
89.75 feet8.09 feet10 feet100 feet
0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.2696 B=
2 inches6 inches
81. 66 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
"::i::i:::*f;Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.8766
308.76 ft/day
6.6 feet
• ,• , ..,'.•. ,•,',•,,. . . .,.,. ,.;,'.;.; >,./.;; ', '.•'.•'.•' ',•'• '.>' . ,'X x-iv" ,-XvX-: •:•:•.-;-:•'•. •.>•:•;•!•:•;•;•'•:•'•: xvx-xox'-rvy-rvX''' ^ ':'' "•'•:•;•'•:•;;«•:•:•:•:•: :•:•••: i*X')» ' ••'•'•:•••••,• '•'•*'iii'i:j •' !•'' •: 'i'X'X'X X1 :':•:••;•:•; x>yv;'' ;•:'•:•,' ;;••,, .•;•'•' "•' • v/vX'X'Xv.v1' •' •]''• '•; '. .'!•:• -:1:1.1 •;-. M'XvM'.'i'i'XvJv.'Wii'X1
10
0
1
<£T3
ffiCu60 0.01
ed6
0.001
0.0001 (
L_J1 B B
fB 1
±_
B B
B B B 1
53 ea
9 EH B I
B3 C
B B B
3 I3
I 0^ 1 _. , IS. s 2 2.5 3Time (mm)m B data points _ regression line
6R30M63
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHO
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test # 1Monitor Well LS-13
';;:.'itkS.if: fi>':*MfMiWXtif:'yi«;
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
&S&:£8&;O::::::x>:Xr:::::r::c;:::;::r::::;r-r;:'::::::r:r:::7tt^
89.75 feet8.09 feet10 feet100 feet
0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
i;:lf g &££$if;g Vf;iS fWmf&•x'V:l$l!' . £.%!':% ^ ^'X;XvXv,;:!:Xv;.vXvX: -:•:•:-:
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.2696 B=
$&£'::X:XW *:wX-X-xU;xW:;X;xW:W ^
2 inches6 inches
81 .66 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
ifiiiilffRegression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
_ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9090
342.85 ft/day
6.6 feet
;:x' ::': Kx'ttx::j&:g&:;:&:;
10
T33DC_£Dbocd
0.001
0.0001
Time (mm)B data points _ regression line
+-Cft0•o<0
oD) •*-*.EC= o
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVKD
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-13
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ K i &iiii ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
89.75 feet8.09 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.2696 B=
2 inches6 inches
81 .66 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =
Hydraulic conductivity = 421.75 ft/day
Effective radial distance_____of slug test =___________6.6 feet
0.0001
B-H D O———B- -B———B-B-
II B B II
Time (min)a data points _ regression line
2 2S 3 3S
AR30M67
CM
*• I10
"
.E == OcoLL
I(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHD
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-15
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
70 feet13.9 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.0410 B=
2 inches6 inches
56.1 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
•.#:''!:C;
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^_^ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9974
55.99 ft/day
5.2 feet
0.010 0.05 0.1 rrfl.15 , . . 0 0 5 OJ 035TYme (min)
H data points _ regression line
-O 0)
c c•53 oE^
inCO
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHD
co
in
/•c/P
<**.s.
0<KP
inC5
CN coI I
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #2Monitor Well LS-15
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
70 feet13.9 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
/\—
3.0410 B=
2 inches6 inches
56.1 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^ Effective radial distance^ fe of slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9941
62.65 ft/day
5.2 feet
10
1 Ih
ed<L>E
bOCed
0.01
0.0010.05 0.1 ,-AlS , . . 02 0 5 03 03STime (mm)
B data points _ regression line
(XHHd) OVHH NIHONVHDRB30M72
SLUG TEST ANALYSISFalling Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-15
•;.::ii!ll:lll:i:;;:lilllliilillilll
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
iiii ii MSiiiuji70 feet
13.9 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
i O ^ j'i i S iJrt'tf'''1' ^
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
3.0410 B=
mm:mmmmmm®wmmmmmmm
2 inches6 inches
56.1 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =
Hydraulic conductivity = 34.17 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =_________5.2 feet
• • • • :. v.v:' •:',-, •;'''''X;X';X';v:'XvX::';';:x'i;x;x:,':'xv:':' ':v::X':;:;x]Xv';:',:.v:'X-;:;'x:i'x;:;:':;:;:'>x:x:'':: ' :• : • x- !•:•'•! 'f •'.&,•& o 4ni'ni'S'tf*%l''t' '• mf i 'j*:€?TH ; 1 •"fr-icf V.'Xvitt'Xv1' :;';v,';:x:X'X':vx': x]:':v:;X':';!;'.':-:;:::;:-;';<-X'-';'; : :'Xvr'''/x':-M': ;':•.•:':• x-x-Xv;- :•'•:";': ;•;•:•'•: x-x-x-Xvi-iv;-'- ; :: ;j': ySiS'? ;;; :? ?:g;S:;s; •;K:K:::H:H:;;;:;iiS:W;;:
10
*z-o !cduE.Buboced o.iu
I
0.01 (•
8
, \iB B a a a i1 B B B B I
B
Tt
a data points
1 B B B B !B
5 , . . 1me (mm)reg]
i i i i
25 3 35
'ession line
&R30M73
•O T%CO
inco
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHO
CO
in<N
*» S
P
inC5
in -i in 01 in co ino I ^ I CN I coI I I I
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test #2Monitor Well US-15
:p!;|: ii;:iil|ililiillli:llillili
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
70 feet13.9 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.0410 B=
2 inches6 inches
56.1 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
, ''tftti'XiXvX/; ' •'••'•['', !x':;x'::£:x':x': \' [v:;::::;:vi;:*i :•:•:• |i': i£:ig:::;:^ Wlr'*.-::':;^^;:.:-' :;.:::::'::::::''::;'::::::::::::;:
ft:fr:$Sv:v'-x ';::;:!vx>:]:;:>,:>:v::: ::: :''': :'•' '• ,-''.•. ; :•:'•'; ; x-x-X" ."j-'v'v'-'''':-:''':?:-:'-1'
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared = 0.9561
Hydraulic conductivity = 34.86 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________5.2 feet___
10
¥(0ffi£* 0.1
0 i
C° '
^ 0.01
0.001 (
m
\\. ^a
I
\
1 S H 0 B B 1
TiB, data points
D B Bl 13 !
me (min)regi
1 ! 1 i i
25 3 3
•ession line
5
AR30M75
CO
co
inCN
CM .. °
/
— I T *H -« T
•O TsCO £CD 3
o>2 I g|| i e
in0
in o in T—i in CN md o I r-3 | ri
I I I
QV3H NIHONVH3
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-16
; 'f. '? M|; Jllll Ilililli.
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
s i sssssjsss ss sino'Aai'!WM%!™3 yWKWM %iW#:U
40 feet11. 13 feet
10 feet100 feet
0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
•Sfilii'jjjiiJ&JSli ilifi'<jpCtiJllv«lliv*lIJ>
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.7571 B=
^mtfmmmmwmmmmimtm-vstixyt' mvwwymmrnw-A 'S' '.im
2 inches6 inches
28.87 feet
Q.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =
Hydraulic conductivity = 36.34 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________3.9 feet
10
g l¥£a <"•*Mt
1
6 o.01
0.001 e
m
a TSL
\B
\ 1
s
\B •\ B B\ B !
\
OS ]
a data
B B SIS B
1 S S 1B B B
rr>. /• I-S- \ 2Time (mm)points regression
II:
2.5 3
line
RR30UI77
=•o "5
o>.±;c e
(xaaj) ovan NI HONVHD(\R30l4l78
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #2Monitor Well LS-16
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Is):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
vXiX;.;:;.;: ::x;:y:::::::':::::;r :':::x:::'X-:WM«'7s|i: ?KMMii9lmff ^
40 feet11. 13. feet
10 feet100 feet0.15 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.7571 B=
2 inches6 inches
28.87 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
/iiI$i!f:t$?S
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9980
40.89 ft/day
3.9 feet
10
ST3es<Uffi.£ "<uMea6 0.01
0.001 cm
V\
\1
. a\ B\ a B i\ B
1B B I
B B B
0.5 1 ry,!TiB data points
BD 8 B S B
1
me(min)regi
1 !: i9
2S 3 3S
•ession line
inco
daaj) OV3H NI BONVHD\80
CO
in
GC
CN
sri
coP
ino
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-16
•i-f •••:: ft,-:1'; :,': '•• J;-; ;•;;:;,; ,;:;:;:!:S¥;rSx;xSx:.:xi:x::x;::x4x:xi::S••••• ;•••. • '•• x ; '.•: i1:' ':v.v'i vKxiiiliXxxSf SJS'Si JSSSSSS:
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
40 feet11. 13 feet
10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.7571 B=
:'x'::*xtt:$:::'X::'vxX:o;::X:X; :;.-;'/; ::x'x f <:•:•'•:'•<: ,:>:"•:; ;':':V: ;;':?:: ri':vtfigix'Sx'ggxfxW
2 inches6 inches
28.87 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
;:r:|;;v::;i#:
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^ Effective radial distance^ B of slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9812
37.70 ft/day
3.9 feet
Graphical Results
0.0010.1 02 —Q3 , . s 0.4 OS 0.6 0.7Time (mm)
data points _ regression line
AR30M8I
(1333) QV3H NI 3OMVHQ
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test #2Monitor Well LS-16
'•'•'••;'] •'' • X'i'i'i-x tt'i'iv'': ::;r':':i;:?h''''i'i;'':'::x''::x'::'T:i::':-x'xv;
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
40 feet11. 13 feet
10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
l iii iii iiiiii lSI!Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.7571 B=
iSl ^ iPlli i iJii
2 inches6 inches
28.87 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
••;:!:'::::,;.'.C:S;:&• , . '• '':•':•', '•;.'.'•:•'•:':•:•/:•' XvX-x '•:•'• •x-XvX'X'X :•: x-x-XvX'X :•:•:•: X'X'XvX'X'X-y'X-x-x*:- -:•:•:•'-.'•>• •:-'-
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =
?:§:;?S;i;?i-JJ:iSjK S SS;•X'X-XvX'X'X':':'?'"'?!^ • •f.W X'X-i'.'X'-X'i'XvXvXvX'X'x; :•: • '•:•'•'•• ••••i;.i':'X ••XvXvXvX .'''X'/:' •'•:•'.'[• ;•;••• '•'•'•J'X'r-r-Xv "•'>'.>' '•'.•'•',•' ',•'•'•'.•'.•'. :•':;•', . ' . ',>,',',<: ,•, ,•;•,•,•.':•'', ' ,'.•;
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9797
26.59 ft/day
3.9 feet
'•:-M^
10
* *
£TJau
? -•t-H
UbficdU 0.01
0.0010•
8
fe
' "V,""1
V^ B
\B ,\ B
1
B 1g B
0.5 rr-f / 1 \ IS 2Time (mm)B data noints regression line
AR3QIH83
0T3CO0
roS.E e= o
(133d) QV3H MI 3OMVHO
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-17
;:;:!;:i:iPl:lIIPiillil ^
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
90 feet12.2 feet10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
iisiiie iB iiijiiiifiiiiiiiiiiWell diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.2300 B=
•iSisiPi
2 inches6 inches
77.8 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
: • ' -': •: ,; ' ,:': ' :''iv'v V;;;;;::;::;::;;x;;'v;'x::;::::x::';:;;;:;' v^;1-1' •.••';-:':!:-'-!';'!!;:;:::::;:;:;::':',:.:<v;r;':- ::'x:'v:;:;:':;:':
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =
SSKSSSiSi•x-fx-i-i-x-r'X':':-:-!" ' '* * /'1' X'.vXx. ':X;X,''XxX:X'X !:X:X;X;X ':':X:':X;::/.vXv:yXxXv:;X>y,x,:px./:xXX x.x.x -'Xi'x';-/,':', •>:-,•;-.'.•:•, •:•:-•-,•• -xW.l.:, . ,...;:..:.:,:;:;:;';
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9259
273.37 ft/day
6.3 feet
10
&•aCO£c o-1• »•*<u60CK5
6 0.01
0.0010
•
1P%BB
B
19 B B
B B B
B
B B B 1
TiB data points
8
9 B B B 1
5 , . . 2me (mm)regi
ii
1 !1
2 3 3.5
•ession line
inco
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHO
co
in(N
ctCS h
4h
ino
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-17
•;' " <••< .,'•• V'; /;::,f:;U viS41;;i ^. •:••-;•-. ".::•: .<?:--•• -' •;-•: - .
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Res
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
90 feet12.2 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.2300 B=
2 inches6 inches
77.8 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
Effective radial distanceof slug test =
feS iMill. ^ !..:;1.1*:":"1''. :':1'.'1 ••^••••+[> •••••.....;.,.. ...-....'. .'.' •. •••••:••••-. • •.:•'.• -. ,', ;•,• 'X'X- '~r~* ~ *TI*'T ' .,,.-. . . ; . . '.'. '•.•' ',;,.. . . ... :•'• . .
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9083
282.72 ft/day
6.3 feet
•:. ':.' ''•'•' ^ ::.;•••' :;;:/:\.'':'' ^10
'•&T3as<u£C o-1• I-*
<ubOa6 0.01
OJWl (
\—\
jaii *»
-1
aa
BB i
8
1 B BEl B B
1
OS
B data
B B B B [
1 B
1 B B B B 1
B
i _,. , is, N :Time (mm)points regression
1
1 I
ZS 3
line
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHD
&R3QM89
(133d) OV3H MI 3ONVH3
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-18
•V-Jk
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
50.5 feet8.11 feet10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9155 B=
2 inches6 inches
42.39 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
.:':'-1it;:::!;$;;;
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^ Effective radial distance^ B of slug test =
j;:;;:$;gii;:!|!Jj
Bouwer and Rice Method0.9972
18.52 ft/day
4.6 feet
•;;::!:-:-:::.;:i:!M
10
;& 'T3ed<L>ffic "-1'i)16 0.01
0.001 e
•
c\>BjEgjg
\B 19 B 1 9 B I
1 2 3 4_. i . . « 7 8 9 10Time (mm)B, data points _ regression line
SR3QM9I
00
T3 0
h.O
c c
(1333) QV3H MI 39MVHD
QO
•*c
Kf
CO
CN
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #2Monitor Well LS-18
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
50.5 feet8.11 feet10 feet100 feet
0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9155 B=
2 inches6 inches
42.39 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =
Hydraulic conductivity = 19.21 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________4.6 feet
Graphical Resalts
10
•aRJDEctsfl
0.01
0.001OS _,. , . x 1 ISTime (mm)
data points __ regression line
eo*T<n co" ="D 0CO >0 1 Oo>±:c c
in -* CO CS rH
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHD
in
co
SLUG TEST ANALYSISiFalling Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-18
^/ii ilSiHil:;:'::;!?:;:?:!!:!?:!::!!:!
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
x-xv X'X*xiXv: XiX'X*X'Xvx>xiX'X'X'Xi:vx-x>!**'»':.i''!jj:'ii
50.5 feet8.11 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
iiilcfS iiiiifiiiiiiiiiiWell diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9155 B=
2 inches6 inches
42.39 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =
Hydraulic conductivity = 21.00 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________4.6 feet
10
g '•oe<3<uffi3 o-iubO§
6 0.01 '
0.001(
a
\1
9
\\\i
\B B\ B B
NV B I
TiB data points
3 B S B B B I
\
me (min) 'regi
i i 9 13
> 2S 3 3S
•ession line
RR30M95
"8
.E c= oCO 5u.
(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test #2Monitor Well LS-18
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
50.5 feet8.11 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=2.9155 B=
2 inches6 inches
42.39 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =
Hydraulic conductivity = 18.35 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =_________4.6 feet
0.0001
II B
OS _1. . . . IS 2 2S'time (min)B, data points _ regression line
RR3QU197
W)
CM
*±"2 0|£^S.E c= oCOLL
CCtc/p.
• • v -« ^- jI I I(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHO
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-19
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
90 feet8.53 feet10 feet100 feet0.13 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.2676 B=
2 inches6 inches
81 .47 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
•:: >; :,;x: |; x ::: •••' ':,.':|:j:;x;;:::.';y::,;:|x|:| ;':;;:;'::':;:':;:;:;;f;;:|;;:!:::;:;:::^
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
^ Effective radial distance^ ^ of slug test =
•x'X'X-xvx-x ;•:•:!"« '."£•£. ;''•:• xixv X'X-x-X'X'X-x-x-x-x 'Xvx X'tti-x-x-xv1': ; .-:•: : y-fv'v, :-, :•••' :•:•:•• r.v'-'X-X'Xv ;•:•;•: :•: :•',-•• •;•:•;•;•;•.• •'•, .•:•:•:•:• •••;•;•:': :,•::•,:'";, ,-:•. ;•: y/,-:-,-;Hilppitifc ^Bouwer and Rice Method
0.9999
649.39 ft/day
6.6 feet
10
§ '<•s<Dffi3 "(t>00cCO
6 0.01
0.001 c
A
Y8 !
9 \ B
\\
1 B
B
B
\
\0.05 0.1 —f.
B data points
B B •
15 / • N 0me (mm)regi
9
ra
B
B
2 025 03 03S
ession line
&R30M99
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test # 1Monitor Well LS-19
• • • '•• '; .-.: ;v': ••'••:'• '•;:,&;;::i::: "" '• :.•:.. : - ;••------ -1 . .: ' • :••••:.••.: v^i: :• • • : • i V "' 'S&XtoW '^ • •' '-' ">•'••• •'." • • ' • • • , -- - - - - - - - - - . - - .
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
90 feet8.53 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.2676 B=
2 inches6 inches
81 .47 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
;. - : • ^.v,;:S:-!;n ... .::.---•••• . ..;.... . .:
Regression line: r squared
Hydraulic conductivity =
Effective radial distanceof slug test =
Bouwer and Rice Method0.7591
209.02 ft/day
6.6 feet
10
0.001
Time (mm)data points _ regression line
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS
Falling Head Test #2Monitor Well LS-19
Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:
Rc=
From type curve:Where Le/rw=
90 feet8.53 feet10 feet100 feet0.14 feet
40ln(Re/rw)=
;::Q»% i J K a::i Trt'W'tt''tt#xW x'12':sw'PPPlJEICo*****!:** ;; ; m«mmmv
Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:
rw=
A=3.2676 B=
2 inches6 inches
81 .47 feet
0.2500 feet
2.70.45
Bouwer and Rice MethodRegression line: r squared =
Hydraulic conductivity = 383.30 ft/day
Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________6.6 feet
0.01
0.001
-*-
0.5 1 _. f 1.5. v 2 2STime (mm)B data points _ regression line
""" O)
*T4-« '
•o "55co >0 >1 o0).1Sc c
CO
in - co
(xaaa) avan NI HONVHO.&R30U202
CO
incs
inc5
CM o,
*-T
tiC C
rH fN) CO -<*© O O OI I I I
(1333) QV3H MI 39MVHD
H- ICO
.EC= oCOLL
I
QVHH NI3ONVHD
CM en*T*•<W CO0 J•o "0f!^- o= 1:= o
avaH NI SONVHD
APPENDIX HIrrigation Well Assessment
H.I Operational Periods of Irrigation Wells
Hastings Irrigation Well
ftR30U208
oS!
CO$0
COCO<
cdOJD
HH
I
£
1m
8
ai
i
ic§ . . . " gE" °-i. saoraaa 10 / NO I
AR30U209
c0ECOCO0CO2 £-
1 1> 03
•i— i
1 -5co .aO) tS•;-; ca*— E
1
cc"gDCO•"•
Si~ .
i i i i i i i i
: •r-> J
M
1
7t-»
$p"
Sii
8
Siis§
i. saoraad aao / NO I
S!
0
COCO
co __* Jo• 1—
C fco •"*MO)-• C3fc ffi
I
s03
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
>->
s
Si"37
s;j.
Si1iTH
73
C 5=O IQ. 0-
aao / NO
v
0coCO0COCO _
IIbfi•—4-1 OJOCO .3O) «•— cct: ffiIE"35
Sii
Si
Si_L3
Co
IE"0
Si
f
Sii
f
Si
Ii
Si
§ "g SCL O.
| saomadaao/NO |
13Q r\ o w • -H
c0ECOCO0COw a
1 o£ gbfic
bfi"to .a05 «••• cdt ffi
1
E"ECO
-
-
-
i i i i i i i i
£ _•i ^HS3 V
cs
CO1
ts
8* [r]tw t-M
3 5-BQ™
SiiA
s?QQ3
1 ! l1 saoraaa aao / NO | M
T————
0
COCO0CO
11^ *3> ed
C
OQ
I
E03CO
Sijr8
I
?
ts9i
_ .._ &COC ^_ IO *^ sex.c J^L
a saomaa aao / NO |
AR30if2l5
4-
0
ECOCO0COCO ^
1 §> •£}^ cd
§ |'43 §0m c*** -i— cO) to•j— cd^ K
1ma m
DC
1
_-
—
-
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
o13
Si353o
fgQ
S!ig-CO1
N
o
o 'gQ- S.I sdomad aao / NO |
Collins Irrigation Well
SiI
Siic
0CO0 *CO
§tofi
«t cVM
fSI
E
1CO
Sii
I8
Siiec a=o oi" °~i. saoiHHJ aao / NO I
Sii. - •=? ^
C0ECOCO0COCO< *"0 G
bflC TTO £••" &2
CO -S0) 3•c oJ±
1E
1CO
_
—
i i I I i I i i
^ f
SiiIOv-f
w<J mQ ™
Sii8
Siiso % JoE P
c0ECOCO0CO
"0 G> 0> T5cdc -p
AcIs 1.5* *3*— U
1
E"sCO
Sij_»-*
SJI
SiI
SiI
O Sg gQ- 0.
g. sdomadaao/NO |
8?ep
C0ECOCO0CO
"0 G> 0> T3cdc -c1o £'15 02S .sWH F"O) -3"E 3
IE15
3
-
-
-
i i i i i i
t ^
Si
<fS
Si§>
* MQ™
s;137s
s"3
§ S sCL Q_
1 sdoraajaao/No | g
Pc0ECOCO0COCO ^
"0 G^ .2
"cdtofin 'EAc ""*
RPEo -S^ •Wfc **~*
|31E"g3CO
-
-
i i i i i i i i i5 st=0 ^Q. Q.
[^ 1 sdomadaao/NO 1
i.1
i
fS
I
—
0coCO0CO
OJ g'•3cd
O
to .sf s
ce
SJr
WlkCOI
SJ
SQ
$
00
g =§ JQ. Q. NE E
BR30U223
H.2 Monitor Well Hydrographs
Monitor Well LD-1
&R30U227
0
I 78 qCO "-1
.1eo
U. >-H
I i_T*
EE3CO
T
2
ts
(xaaa) aaAai >iaxvM NI
0
I 78 Sco |-JJ*5 =3 ^_______—(—— r< 13 ^ '
"0
CO
3CO
§c 2
o1-1
'
13A31 H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO
Si
0
8 SCO J
-J— tcO
c 2
f•c Sl« 00— o
Ui
g
CO
Si38
f m"18!i
SiiIrt O !<•> it </•>O O I ^
I I
NI 30NVH3
&R301423Q
IBO
8
R
•» in <o f^,O O O O r s i
(X33d) 13A31 H3XVAV NI3ONVHD
5R30U231
0COco YCO QCO J
oE 2
.8JSP*
gI
E"gCO
SiI•?Is
s;i
00
Si00
r-l II S
13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVHO
flR30l»232
—»——
0
CO?
CO 7 S |
0
co HCO -1
GO
c 2.2 84-i IM
CO 43If• IccgCO
&lJr
Si
&J
13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVHO
t
0
Wco®coco
0> ^5 -ac
GQ
OH
S
DC
3co
I8-enI
9,
i
T8-
c! c! c> o' I1 1 1 !
(X3Hd) 13A3T H31VM NI 3ONVH3
-• ——
0
COco v® Aco Qco J
GO
CMO>
*OOI
S!ii8
jr8
w»
8-o I
a3A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVHD
HR30U23S
Monitor Well LS-2
ftR3Ql»236
~I
0
COCO0COCO
G
€O)l_ Ui^ toO- 8
T3
HH
DC
g3CO
O _
1^^
8
Sii
Sii
S!ic
o o o oI I I I
13A31H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3
0COCO0COCO
1 1> Goc 2
CO 43O) P*•B »•.
— OI *inHH3CO
(XH3H) 13A31H3XVAV NI HONVHD
3QU238
0
3
Sii
Sii
"1(NT
Si
O' O C> c! O° C> C> C> OI I I I I I I I
13A31 H3XVAV NI 30NVHO
flR30U239
_£3co
oIco 78 2co d< o
0
CtgO)
i IHH*
SiI
8!
Cl33d) a3A31 H3XVM. NI 3ONVHO
0COSR <*0 iCO co
03CO
= I0 t.GO
WJ CLttmm ZT1v. F5
-PKM
Si
a
Sieo
NO\
SP
S!
(xaaa) asAai naxvM NI
0
COCO0COCO
— oI tffi1co
^>^
<L>
"0 g> "GoCO— ^ ^CO 43
*
f f ? ? f f f f f(xaaa) 13A3T HaxvM NI
No,
en1
8-en
i?
I
(X33d) a3AHT miVAV NI 3ONVHD
— • ———
0
I 7% 3CO d
1§cCO -G
.? s
g3CO
(N9t
oIS
siJr
(xaaa) aaAai naxvM NI
Monitor Well LS-3
NI 3ONVHO
0COCOG >s > sg - _V ?
o
0 gGO
= 2O t-43ed
HH
cc"gco
•
Sii
Siicf*4 f<> •«*• l* v t . oo Oi«> o o o' o «> o o'I I I I I I I I
13A31H3XVM NI 39NVH3
(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVHD
13A31H3XVAY NI 39NVH3
c0)
CO
COCO<
£3CO
iu i i 1 ^ 1 i i i.o
OuI U
E . 1 g^
Si
iTj-
g2?
(X333) a3A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO
0COCO0COCO
0 SGO
COB
II fr_g
CO
Ol
?m
VI
8-enI
oo
Si00•3
o o o o o o o o oI I I I I I I I I
(X33d) THA31H3XVAV NI 39NVH3
0COCO <?0 ICO cqCO ^*ls-<2• I—IGo
c 2o ^tW o•I
0CO
P _7 T
Cl
f
?CO
en
8-en
(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVHO
0wCO®COCO
3
(-12g
cCO -*•i5 2t &JO
"
I
as
a
(X333) 13A31H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO
RR30U253
Monitor Well LS-8
0COw °°% J,CO ico ~< ?"0 o> •-5 §c 2o *
o
g3CO
Sic
Sii
4c> c> o' c> c> c> c>I I I I I I I
(X333) 13A31 H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO
(X333) 13A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3
ell Assessment
tor Well LS-8
- rrgn
Hydrograph for M
aure
!/•>C>
Si
Sia
1
(X333) 13A31 H3XVM NI 39NVH3
ftR30U257
0
COW o oICO <«CO J
33
0CO
c 2.2 g"CO 43
1 £
g3CO
gI00
<s
g
gi3
o'I
13A31 H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
sp
c0
CO ooCO i0 coW a<
«
23CO
—— feJD0 .S
2
gi1
2P
00
??
(X333) 13A31H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3
0CO opCO I0 coCO "J
Coco £O 43
..V i-<
O
DC
3CO
•8-ento
<
t
t8 igk
g
(XH3d) 13A3T HSXVAi NI3ONVHD
W
Laurel Rl - Irrig
m Well Assessment
^Hydrograph for Mo
nitoring Well LS-8
i
(<
I{(s
s
" ^
__ s
y
•> o m «-< v> & T-
1 1
(X333) 13A3T aXVM NI 3ONVH3
NOl
8-n8
S
t«0-H
P3If«\8-mCOi-(
Si8-m
> 1«3
AR301426
0
COCO oo0 ICO coCO -)
IGO2
<« 43———^ VMMf
O) O,•"» cd
1CO
8
I8
<^eAfcl
S!
eno I
(X333) 13A3T HSLLVM NI 3ONVH3
Monitor Well LS-12
AR30U263
—•——
0CO <s>CO rH0 ICO coCO J
g3CO
GO
S sP M
43§* <I
gjLiS
g
gC S O M • * V C o o ^ - io o o o o I ;3
I I I I
(X33d) 13A3T H3XVAV NI 39NVHD
a:"gCO
gi
—1
0E0 ICO co
S <2® -C!O) a,'= 2
g
IO
g
g
f
(X333) 13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
g
c0
I a0 ICO co
0 u
MG
= I0 1
•c f
M-i
g
3CO
gi3i
gi
gI
gI3
o' o o' o' II I I I
(X333) 13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
0
i a0 iCO coCO J
=O
IE
3CO
(X333) 13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
gI
g
s
g00
g
0COCO0CO
K
o•s*.
oO) .— DH!• tf^ t-l
2
03
g
7
g
Is
is
N
T
gI
(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
0
I 20 ICO co
GO
C 5
•i 1
ffiHM
1(0
jr8
gCO
8
(X33d) 13AHT mXVAV NI 3ONVHO
"I
0
i 20) ICO v>
G
= I0!^ M 1——^O} Cu
"" O1 1CC
CO
^c
5<r>
^<c<
^- — — •
?
>
>' c! o' ^ c> o c> cJ o c1 1
8-en1f>T-I
1O,Oco
> S
A (X333) 13A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3
vi
itm«e
RR304270
T
0
CO
0
G
= IO ~co 2• ••I ZtrfW C3
t!_ ffi££
i
II
tsT
SQ
cs o Io' 2
(X333) 13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
Monitor Well LS-14
0CO .0 T -^^CO co
flgG
Oc s°S<4—(43
g
3CO
tt-Mg
g3s
(S tr> <<h inc> o c! oI I I I
(X33d) 13AHT H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO
^ —
0
I s0 ICO co
Co
t *-<* tsfi
I
—cc13CO
g3
gi
g18
gi
f
(X333) 13A3T HaLVM NI 3ONVH3
c0
i s0 iCO co
0
G
c %
o
Ih-Hg
3CO
Ia
o\I
g
gO CS •* •*> W i-l
o' c! c> <£ II I I I
(X333) 13A31 H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
g
0COCO0COCO
-»oc so tB fftHH
3CO
gI<
gI
gj3I-VI
g
^ "2 "to o oI I I
(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
0COco 2;0
o.aGo
•ia» -aIEg3CO
gLIa
gooI
a
g00 wH
gi
g
(X33H) a3A3T H3XVAV NI3ONVHD
0CO rf^ % 801 * §CO coCO J
kco - <^ '
^^ GoI?J J ^ /ffl sO) di•— cd>— 6A
g
CO
o>
Jr
oI
g
Jra
gi
(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
(X33i> 13A31H3XVAV NI3ONVHO
RR30U279
0CO TfCO S ^ '0 ICO coCO J< *
G ^ Si
CO
O2
1O) PH'•- cd— O
•I
<$8
COI
(X33d) 13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVHO
RR30U280
Monitor Well LS-16
AR30U28I
(X33d) 13A3T miVM. NI 3ONVHD
0
co 50 iCO co5 = i0 g
GO
J™ bflS
I *°I ^ fc
g
CO
gIo
g
I2
gI
t-l CS C^> •**• IO ^^ f~ CO O* - r n lo o' tf o <S <S o' o' o' ISI I I I I I 1 I I
(X333) 13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
S!
C0
CO V£CO n0 ICO coCO J^ T5
sGO
S 20
O)
EDC"g3
gia
g
g
g3
*-t &t ef) •** \f> )& C-» ooo o o o o o o oI I I I I I I I
(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 39NVH3
g
0
COCO £0 7w nCO 3< d
Gc £
t 2mm b£
OI *o
g
1
g
IS
gI? "3
g
f
g
1 S
(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
A-R30l*286
0
COCO0COCO
5O
S S.Q **"5 43CD DH•«•• cdk_i u<" toJD•" O
'I
e < a
|co
Ot
Jr
§
g00
a
inf
(X333) a3A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3
0£ veCO rH0 ICO coCO J< a
.53
Ig3CO
G
I
8-en8
enIOO
as-
tf> \& t~c> <5 o"I I I
(X333) a3A31 H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
cso\I
0
COCO
coCO H-3<
fO) a,•!•• cd
"I1 I
£3CO
as
en
a
v>
8-encs I> °0
13A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVHO
Monitor Well LS-17
AR30i*29Q
g
^
0CO ^CO S0 ICO coil0
GO
g3CO
*
oS-i
g
gc3
g
gIc
(XHHH) q3A3T HBXVAV NI SONVHO
RR30U29I
0S oV) rH0 Ito v>W j
feO
.53O""5
IHHDC
CO
(X333) a3A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
g
g
PQIgi
i8
0CO ^CO 50 ICO co
0
GO
C
0 I
?™ ui feo
I
E
1CO
\>
gI2
g
8
gI
g37
oI
(X333) 13A31H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
<u
0 u.-4-J• -tGO
O t5'•S OT3 <£5
IT!MHcc£3CO
0
CO ^to ^ \ i0 I * 8CO coCO J
g
g3
gI<
gIi—v
I
g
(X33d) 13A31H3XVM NI HONVHD
0COCO £0 7C/5 'to 3< a13
50.aG
C
i!MHDC
"03
g
a
g
g§°
(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 39NVH3
i?r-« I
1 §
AR30I4295
0CO ^CO £;0 ICO coCO J
CD
Go5-to
oUi
IH-lDC
3CO
I8 g
O5
• 8-en
CN
I
afa
gi
i
(X33d) 13A31 H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
< a
g3CO
fCi
8-enIOO
enI
Ien
<f> o <-•> r-i 1 1 CN Io o- I Y ' 8
(X333) 13A31H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3
0
if130
» f£ §>
'IHMg
3CO
a
is
P-lO>I
O>
JrI
(X33d) 13A3133XVM NI3ONVHD
RR30U298
Monitor Well LS-19
AR3Q14299
(X33d) 13A3T miVAV NI 3ONVHO
RR'30U30tt
052coOCOCO
GO
c 20
3CO
3••^ ^^f I1IBM OJQ
g
i1/1 I
7*
(X333) aSA31 H3XVM NI 39NVH3
g
0
CO asCO 1-10 ICO cqCO J
GO
__ .G°* &•-- cd
HH
£3CO
gJ[3cI
gJ3i—»I
CN o CN TJ- \e> oo Tc> o o o o I
I I I I
(X333) 13A31 H3XVAV NI 39NVH3
A.R304302
g
0CO oxCO TH0 ICO coCO J
0
co
o• I—IGO
oS-i
IHH
g
3CO
gepf w
g±3i-»
I
gr-l rf> -* 10o o' o o'I I I I
(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 3ONVH3
fl-R30l*303
(X333) 13A31H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3
(X33d) 13A3T H3XVM NI39NVHD
RR3QI+305
(X333) 13A31H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3
AR3QU306
(X333) a3A31 H3XVM MI 3ONVH3 A
APPENDIX I
Meteorological Data for 17 June 1992
AR3Ql*3Q8
SUSSEX COUNTY, DEL - LAUREL LANDFILLMETEOROLOGICAL DATA
17 JUNE 1992
SOUTH
EAST
C NORTH
WEST
| SOUTH
EAST
NORTH i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900
930 1030 1130 1230 1330 1430 1530 1630 1730 1830 1930TIME [EOT]
100
80
UJS- 60
40
20
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
20
1816
10 ffi
6
4
900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900930 1030 1130 1230 1330 1430 1530 1630 1730 1830 1930
TIME [EOT]
^ SUSSEX COUNTY, DEL. - LAUREL LANDFILL• WIND ROSE^ 17 JUNE 1992
HOUR 0900 - HOUR 2000 [EOT]
'
' ' ' —— ' —— 1 —— I —— |1 3 6 10 16 21 93SCALE (MPH)
WIND SPEED (MPH) PERCENT OCCURRENCE1-3 3-6 6-10 10-16 16-21 >21
N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00NNE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ENE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00E 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ESE 1.53 18.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00[E 1.53 48.85 13.74 0.00 0.00 0.00^ KE 0.76 4.58 8.40 0.00 0.00 0.00
"kr --*- ~ ~ ~
V
WIND SPEED (MPH) PERCENT OCCURRENCE1-3 3-5 6-10 10-16 16-21 >21
S 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SSW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
WSW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
WNW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NNW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
AR-30I+3IO
APPENDIX J
Soil Gas Screening Results
AR3QUH
Initial Soil Gas Survey Results
AR30UI2
Summary of Soil Gas Survey
Results from Survey of Landfill GasesGrid AR06-LGA
SampleLocationAR06-LGA-01AR06-LGA-02AR06-LGA-03AR06-LGA-04AR06-LGA-05AR06-LGA-06AR06-LGA-07AR06-LGA-08AR06-LGA-09AR06-LGA-10AR06-LGA-11AR06-LGA-12AR06-LGA-13AR06-LGA-14AR06-LGA-15AR06-LGA-16AR06-LGA-17AR06-LGA-18AR06-LGA-19AR06-LGA-20AR06-LGA-21AR06-LGA-22
Date17-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-92
Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane5.048.55.80.00.00.053.34.40.00.02.18.050.61.611.86.11.643.30.012.03.020.5
Carbon Dioxide5.041.76.03.05.00.029.15.20.99.63.510.341.44.816.98.313.823.33.617.18.323.5
Oxygen16.04.516.9
. 18.617.521.42.518.020.012.27.912.23.114.39.715.68.87.818.69.115.57.4
Summary of Soil Gas Survey(cont'd)
Results from Survey of Landfill GasesGridAR07-LGA
SampleLocationAR07-LGA-01AR07-LGA-02AR07-LGA-03AR07-LGA-04AR07-LGA-05AR07-LGA-06AR07-LGA-07AR07-LGA-08AR07-LGA-09AR07-LGA-10AR07-LGA-11AR07-LGA-12AR07-LGA-13AR07-LGA-14AR07-LGA-15AR07-LGA-16AR07-LGA-16(Duplicate)AR07-LGA-17AR07-LGA-18AR07-LGA-19AR07-LGA-20AR07-LGA-21AR07-LGA-22AR07-LGA-23AR07-LGA-24
Date18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92
18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92
Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane
0.30.820.730.19.64.80.015.111.111.915.80.00.042.50.064.753.6
0.00.058.81.851.452.362.351.9
Carbon Dioxide4.40.810.612.58.44.30.910.49.49.420.40.52.130.86.622.916.9
1.52.833.02.839.740.320.717.7
Oxygen14.219.713.5-10.613.917.220.614.516.013.89.920.619.66.815.98.25.3
19.218.83.619.63.23.04.96.4
Summary of Soil Gas Survey(cont'd)
Results from Survey of Landfill GasesGridAR08-LGA
SampleLocationAR08-LGA-01AR08-LGA-02AR08-LGA-03AR08-LGA-04AR08-LGA-05AR08-LGA-06AR08-LGA-07AR08-LGA-08AR08-LGA-09AR08-LGA-10AR08-LGA-11AR08-LGA-12AR08-LGA-13AR08-LGA-14AR08-LGA-15AR08-LGA-16AR08-LGA-17AR08-LGA-18AR08-LGA-19AR08-LGA-20AR08-LGA-21(Inside Well LS-1)
Date18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92
Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane0.00.00.156.356.20.513.254.30.00.50.00.052.50.00.00.00.00.016.641.624.3
Carbon Dioxide0.12.50.736.534.03.210.042.61.1
, 1.74.23.341.70.70.40.91.60.613.228.518.4
Oxygen20.818.320.02.42.518.911.63.119.719.817.518.02.520.519.819.520.020.710.96.812.2
AR3Ql43i5
Summary of Soil Gas Survey(cont'd)
Results from Survey of Landfill GasesPerimeter Locations
SampleLocationAR09-LGA-01AR09-LGA-02AR09-LGA-03AR09-LGA-04AR09-LGA-05AR09-LGA-06
Date18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92
Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane0.00.20.80.00.00.0
Carbon Dioxide1.38.50.80.62.02.4
Oxygen19.715.420.220.519.219.0
AR30U.3I6
•Supplemental Soil Gas Survey Results
AR30U3I7
Summary of Supplemental Soil Gas Monitoring
K Samples Taken Outside Landfill Perimeter
impleLocation
AR-P-LGA-01AR-P-LGA-02AR-P-LGA-03AR-P-LGA-04AR-P-LGA-05AR-P-LGA-06AR-P-LGA-07AR-P-LGA-08AR-P-LGA-09AR-P-LGA-10AR-P-LGA-11AR-P-LGA-12AR-P-LGA-13AR-P-LGA-14AR-P-LGA-15AR-P-LGA-16
^ AR-P-LGA-17^B AR-P-LGA-18^ AR-P-LGA-19
AR-P-LGA-20AR-P-LGA-21AR-P-LGA-22AR-P-LGA-23AR-P-LGA-24AR-P-LGA-25AR-P-LGA-26AR-P-LGA-27AR-P-LGA-28AR-P-LGA-29AR-P-LGA-30AR-P-LGA-31AR-P-LGA-32AR-P-LGA-33AR-P-LGA-34AR-P-LGA-35AR-P-LGA-36AR-P-LGA-37
l ^ AR-P-LGA-38Ik AR-P-LGA-39^ AR-P-LGA-40I AR-P-LGA-41
Date28-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328 -Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328 -Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328 -Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9328-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329 -Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329-Apr-9329 -Apr- 9329 -Apr-93
Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Carbon Dioxide | Oxygen0.10.40.40.41.01.10.40.30.40.10.20.21.00.30.20.81.10.82.80.30.30.30.30.20.20.11.10.40.40.30.10.20.20.30.80.80.70.31.50.51.6
19.920.020.220.319.519.119.920.019.820.020.220.219.619.819.919.619.519.617.819.619.819.919.920.019.920.019.319.919.919.920.020.120.120.119.619.619.820.018.719.817.3
AR30U3I8BASLRES1A.WK3