Post on 21-Jan-2016
Anthropogenic Land Cover Change Experiments in the CCSM
Participants
NCAR University of KansasGordon Bonan Johannes Feddema Linda Mearns Trish JacksonKeith Oleson Pei-Ling LinJerry Meehl John BauerWarren WashingtonDoug NychkaLawrence Buja
This research is supported by the Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy, Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC02-97ER62402, by the National Science Foundation grant numbers ATM-0107404, and ATM-0413540, the NCAR Weather and Climate Impact Assessment Science Initiative, and the University of Kansas, Center for Research.
Overview:
1. How are the experiments set up and developed?a. Equilibrium vs transient experimentsb. Uncertainty about land cover and its impactsc. Multiple land cover forcings (e.g. agriculture vs grazing)
2. Dealing with multiple climate forcings a. Land cover change alongside other forcingb. Statistical Significance in this framework
3. Separating out signals and feedbacks between forcingsa. Complex and non-linear responses to the same forcingb. Optimizing experimental design
1. How are the experiments set up and developed?a. Equilibrium vs transient experimentsb. Uncertainty about land cover and its impactsc. Multiple land cover forcings (e.g. agriculture vs grazing)
2. Dealing with multiple climate forcings a. Land cover change alongside other forcingb. Statistical Significance in this framework
3. Separating out signals and feedbacks between forcingsa. Complex and non-linear responses to the same forcingb. Optimizing experimental design
Equilibrium Experiments:1. Hold all conditions equal and allow the model to run to equilibrium 2. Compare a control and experiment where one or more boundary conditions are
changed3. Typically compare 10-50 year time slices after equilibrium is reached
Transient Experiments:1. Starting from some equilibrium state the model runs through time as forcings
change (e.g. increasing CO2 through time)2. Compare a control and experiment integrated over one or more time periods during
the simulation3. Model usually does not reach equilibrium so equivalent time slices of 10-30 years
are compared
1. How are the experiments set up and developed?a. Equilibrium vs transient experimentsb. Uncertainty about land cover and its impactsc. Multiple land cover forcings (e.g. agriculture vs. grazing)
2. Dealing with multiple climate forcings a. Land cover change alongside other forcingb. Statistical Significance in this framework
3. Separating out signals and feedbacks between forcingsa. Complex and non-linear responses to the same forcingb. Optimizing experimental design
PCM Uncertainty/Historical Equilibrium Land Cover Simulations
PCM Uncertainty/Historical Equilibrium Land Cover Simulations
PRESENT DAY UNCERTAINTY• Arctic – albedo• Amazon – latent heat flux• Australia – albedo
HISTORICAL CHANGEClimate difference from land cover classification is as large as the climate difference from land cover change• Primarily shift to agriculture
Question: How do we deal with input uncertainty?
AgreementGLC2000
IGBPMODIS
No Ag1 product
All products2 products
Comparison of Agriculture land classes from 3 satellite products10 degree tile over East Africa
1. How are the experiments set up and developed?a. Equilibrium vs transient experimentsb. Uncertainty about land cover and its impactsc. Multiple land cover forcings (e.g. agriculture vs. grazing)
2. Dealing with multiple climate forcings a. Land cover change alongside other forcingb. Statistical Significance in this framework
3. Separating out signals and feedbacks between forcingsa. Complex and non-linear responses to the same forcingb. Optimizing experimental design
Question: How do to isolate the impacts of multiple forcings?
1. How are the experiments set up and developed?a. Equilibrium vs transient experimentsb. Uncertainty about land cover and its impactsc. Multiple land cover forcings (e.g. agriculture vs grazing)
2. Dealing with multiple climate forcings a. Land cover change alongside other forcingb. Statistical Significance in this framework
3. Separating out signals and feedbacks between forcingsa. Complex and non-linear responses to the same forcingb. Optimizing experimental design
Halocarbons
N2O
CH4
CO2
0
1
2
3
-1
-2
Stratosphericozone
Troposphericozone
Sulfate
Fossil fuel burning
BiomassBurning
MineralDust
Aerosolindirect effect
Land use(albedo)
SolarBlack carbon
Organic carbon
Aerosols
Rad
iativ
e F
orci
ng (
Wm
-2)
War
min
gC
oolin
g
Global Mean Radiative Forcing In 2000 Relative To 1750
High Medium Medium Low Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Level Of Scientific Understanding(IPCC, 2001)
IPCC and human impacts
IMAGE 2.2 - 1970 Land Cover
IMAGE 2.2 Land Cover Types
0 - Ocean
1 - Agriculture
2 - Extensive grassland
3 - C plantation - NU
4 - Regrowth (abandon)
5 - Regrowth (timber)
6 - Ice
7 - Tundra
8 - Wooded Tundra
9 - Boreal Forest
10 - Cool Conifer
11 - Temperate Mixed Forest
12 - Temperate Decid Forest
13 - Warm Mixed Forest
14 - Grass/Steppe
15 - Desert
16 - Scrubland
17 - Savanna
18 - Tropical Woodland
19 - Tropical Forest
No Data
By 2100, expansion of agricultural land in North America, South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia
Question:What is the land use forcing relative to other natural and anthropogenic forcings?
IMAGE 2.2 - A2: 2100 Land Cover
IMAGE 2.2 Land Cover Types
0 - Ocean
1 - Agriculture
2 - Extensive grassland
3 - C plantation - NU
4 - Regrowth (abandon)
5 - Regrowth (timber)
6 - Ice
7 - Tundra
8 - Wooded Tundra
9 - Boreal Forest
10 - Cool Conifer
11 - Temperate Mixed Forest
12 - Temperate Decid Forest
13 - Warm Mixed Forest
14 - Grass/Steppe
15 - Desert
16 - Scrubland
17 - Savanna
18 - Tropical Woodland
19 - Tropical Forest
No Data
The A2 Scenario:The A2 storyline and scenario family describes a very heterogeneous world. The underlying theme is self-reliance and preservation of local identities. Fertility patterns across regions converge very slowly, which results in continuously increasing global population. Economic development is primarily regionally oriented and per capita economic growth and technological change are more fragmented and slower than in other storylines.
2100
1970
PCM Future SRES A2 Transient Simulations
Future IPCC SRES Scenarios for PCM
PCM Future SRES A2 Transient Simulations
Projected change by 2100 – Annual Average TemperatureGHG only
LC contribution(GHG+LC) – GHG only
GHG + LC
* Note Shift in Divergent Scale
B1 A2
2050
2100
Question: How to best identify land cover impacts in a multi-forcing run?
Relative impact of land cover forcing compared to GHG effectsOn average LULC contributes 11% of 2100 forcing compared to GHG-only forcing.However, this is highly regional and offsetting with respect to global average temperature
PCM Future SRES A2 Transient Simulations
Question: What is a good measure to compare different forcings? (radiative forcing) Given that we have spatial and temporal results that can be offsetting.
B1 A2
2050
2100
Question: How to best isolate direct impacts from teleconnections?
1. How are the experiments set up and developed?a. Equilibrium vs transient experimentsb. Uncertainty about land cover and its impactsc. Multiple land cover forcings (e.g. agriculture vs grazing)
2. Dealing with multiple climate forcings a. Land cover change alongside other forcingb. Statistical Significance in this framework
3. Separating out signals and feedbacks between forcingsa. Complex and non-linear responses to the same forcingb. Optimizing experimental design
Change in temperature
Shading = standard t test 0.95 confidence levelContour = bootstrap 0.95 confidence level
Annual
PCM Historical Comparison
JJA
DJF
Bootstrap confidence test shows strongsummer hemisphere signal in sub-tropics
Many of the areas are over land cover change locations
Question: How to best /most efficiently evaluate confidence?
1. How are the experiments set up and developed?a. Equilibrium vs transient experimentsb. Uncertainty about land cover and its impactsc. Multiple land cover forcings (e.g. agriculture vs grazing)
2. Dealing with multiple climate forcings a. Land cover change alongside other forcingb. Statistical Significance in this framework
3. Separating out signals and feedbacks between forcingsa. Complex and non-linear responses to the same forcingb. Optimizing experimental design
Seasonal Change inAlbedo
Seasonal Change inNet Radiation
PCM Present Day ComparisonImage - LSM
Strong winter/spring albedo changein the Northern Hemispheretranslates to spring/summer
net radiation change due to solarseasonality
Question: How to best detect seasonally varying responses?
Albedo
PCM Historical Comparison
DJF JJACloud cover change
Incident radiation
Albedo changes, but cloud cover
also plays a major role
Local feedbacks or changes in circulation?
Question: How to identify feedbacks, and can we have confidence in these signals?
Future Scenario:All grid cells that have been converted from tropical rain forest to agricultural change
The Amazon response is very different from SE Asia response in part because of the
large scale circulation conditions
Question: How to best detect spatial
variability in specific responses?
Variability in Simulated Heat Island caused by Climate
and Rural Environment •Atmospheric forcing from CAM (offline model)
•Default city with H/W=0.5,…,3.0
•Rural environment from CLM Surface Data
The urban model has very distinctly different responses depending on
weather conditions and on surrounding vegetation types
Question: How to organize output to best analyze the variability in responses?
1. How are the experiments set up and developed?a. Equilibrium vs transient experimentsb. Uncertainty about land cover and its impactsc. Multiple land cover forcings (e.g. agriculture vs grazing)
2. Dealing with multiple climate forcings a. Land cover change alongside other forcingb. Statistical Significance in this framework
3. Separating out signals and feedbacks between forcingsa. Complex and non-linear responses to the same forcingb. Optimizing experimental design
Currently simulations are run independently for all possible forcings then in combination.
Question: Knowing there are non linear feedbacks, is there a way to reduce the number of runs with combinations of experiments to:
a) Extract the individual climate impacts of each forcingb) Understand the non linear interactions between the forcings