Analyzing Urban Sprawl Using Multi Temporal And Multi Source Geospatial Data Fusion

Post on 18-Jun-2015

840 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Analyzing urban sprawl Analyzing urban sprawl using using multimulti--temporal andtemporal andmultimulti--sourcesourcegeospatial data fusiongeospatial data fusion for Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Transcript of Analyzing Urban Sprawl Using Multi Temporal And Multi Source Geospatial Data Fusion

Analyzing urban sprawl Analyzing urban sprawl using using

multimulti--temporal andtemporal andmultimulti--sourcesource

geospatial data fusiongeospatial data fusionJan-Peter Mund

& Andreas von der Dunk

2 / 18JanJan--PeterPeter MundMund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

1 Introduction

1.1 Rapid Urbanisation in Asia

• Rapid economic growth Rapid urbanisation in asian countries• Phnom Penh 2002 – 2007: 8-9 % annual population growth rate • Urbanisation often unsupervised and spontaneous• Characterized by patches of isolated tracts which are separated

from other areas by vacant land urban sprawl • Spatial assessment of urban growth patterns allows better planning

of basic infrastructures like water, sanitation and electricity as well as land and resource management

• Remote sensing techniques have a significant multitemporalpotential to monitor urban expansion

Introduction

3 / 18JanJan--PeterPeter MundMund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

1 Introduction

1.2 Methodological Issues with Remote Sensing of Urban Areas

• How to proper measure and quantify the patterns of urban growth?• Landscape metrics can be implemented to quantify urban sprawl• Landscape metrics are based upon an a priori classification

• How to incorporate historical urbanisation trends / historical data sources to further enhance the assessment of urbanization patterns?• Landsat MSS/TM data is only available for the last 35 years• Historical land-cover changes derived from analogue maps

enhance the assessment of urbanization patterns

Introduction

4 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

1 Introduction

1.3 Objectives of the Study

• To investigate long-term land-cover changes of the Phnom Penh urban area over the past 80 years

Assessed by combining multi-temporal remote sensing imagery with historical analogue urban maps

• To quantify land-cover changes using landscape metricsApplication of Shannon’s Diversity Index (SDI)SDI has repeatedly proven its effectiveness in quantifying

the extent of urban sprawl

Introduction

5 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

2.1 Study Area

2 Study Area & Data Used

Introduction Study Area & Data

• Total Population: 14 Mio• Total Urban Population: 2 Mio• Total Pop. Phnom Penh 1,3 Mio• 7-9% annual growth rate of Phnom

Penh’s population• Special emphasis on regional land

use planning and urban land management as well as cadastral standardisation

6 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

2.2 Data Used

• GIS-Data • Phnom Penh Street Map• Administrative Boundaries

• RS-Data• Multi-temporal and multi-spectral LANDSAT imagery • High resolution optical remote sensing data (Quickbird)• Ortho-photo images from the last 40 year

• Analogue Maps • Topographic maps (1: 50.000; from 2002)• Historical maps from the 1920’s to 1970’s

2 Study Area & Data Used

Introduction Study Area & Data

7 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

3 Methodology

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy

Analogue Data(Thematic Maps,

Topo-Sheets)

Remote Sensing Data

(Landsat TM)InputData

Scanning, Georeferencing

Image Enhancement & Rectification

Data Pre-Processing

Head-up Digitizing

Classification & Change Detection

Data Preperation

Applying Landscape Metrics

Applying Landscape Metrics

Measuring Urban Sprawl

8 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

• Preprocessing• Rectification, image enhancement, atmospheric correction• Sub-pixel pre-processing for supervised classification and

density correlation• Semi-automated segmentation and region re-growth

• Classification enhancement• Application of knowledge-based post-classification using the

Knowledge Classifier Module in ERDAS Imagine• Results

• Raster datasets for the time periods 1989, 2002, 2005• Conversion matrix to indicate the details of land-use conversion

3 Methodology

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy

9 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

Input:

Multispectral dataradiometric and

orthometric correction

Selection of Source pixel

automatic

semi-automatic

Growing of regionsaccross all bands

based on source pixel

Classification of 3 density classes basedon pixel similarity across

the whole szene

Re-growth of densitypattern according

classified pixel and pixel calssification into

three classes

Buffering of threedensity classes to minimum region of

6x6 pixel

Ste

p1

Ste

p2

Step

4S

tep5

Step

6

Inpu

t3 Methodology: Segmentation and Region Growth

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy

10 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

4.1 Recent patterns and structures of regional urban growth • Visual interpretation: urban density along major roads and

throughout the city centre is increasing

4 Results & Discussion

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy Results & Discussion

11 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

• Urban land cover of high density has increased from 8 to 35%• Urban land cover of medium density has increased from 19 – 61 %

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy Results & Discussion

4 Results & Discussion

4.2 Recent patterns and structures of regional urban growth

12 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

4.3 Application of Landscape Metrics• Landscape metrics

• Statistical approaches to quantify and measure landscape patterns

• Urban Sprawl is characterized by a “disorganized” landscape pattern

• Shannon’s Diversity Index• Used to measure the degree of “disorganisation” of a landscape

(= degree of urban sprawl)

4 Results & Discussion

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy Results & Discussion

13 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

4.3 Application of Landscape Metrics

• Shannon‘s Diversity Index (SDI):

t t + 1 t + 2

4 Results & Discussion

SDI: 0,8

Sprawl

SDI: 0,6

Beginning Consolidation

SDI: 0,2

Compact Urban Area

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy Results & Discussion

14 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

4.3 Application of Landscape Metrics

0,2

0,7

0,7 0,7

0,40,5

0,2

0,6

‘89 ‘05

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy Results & Discussion

4 Results & Discussion

15 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy Results & Discussion

Scanning & Georeferencing Head-up Digitizing of Urban Patches

Calculating SDI

0,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

1922 1937 1943 1958 1968 1994

SDI

4.4 Analogue Maps

4 Results & Discussion

16 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

4 Results & Discussion

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy Results & Discussion

4.4 Analogue Maps

17 / 18JanJan--Peter MundPeter Mund

Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der DunkGI_ForumJuly 2008

Objective:• To quantify urban sprawl by applying landscape metrics to

classified remote sensing as well as analogue data

Results:• Landscape metrics were succesfully applied to remote sensing

as well as analogue data• Results could not yet be brought in line due to cartographic

generalization

Outlook:• Search for and incorporate more detailed analogue data

5 Conclusion

Introduction Study Area & Data Methodolgy Results & Discussion Conclusion

ThankThank youyou forfor youryour attentionattention!!

JanJan--Peter MundPeter MundJanJan--Peter.Mund@dlr.dePeter.Mund@dlr.de

&&Andreas von der DunkAndreas von der Dunk

andreas.von.der.dunk@gmx.deandreas.von.der.dunk@gmx.de