Post on 08-Apr-2018
A U G U S T 2 3 , 2 0 1 6
C H I C A G O , I L
A U G U S T 2 4 , 2 0 1 6
O A K B R O O K , I L
An Update on Employment Law -
New Overtime Regulations andthe Defend Trade Secrets Act
1
.
ogletreedeakins.com
The Final Overtime Regulations: What The NewMinimum Salary Requirements Mean for Employers
Presented by
Michael H. Cramer
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Overview
Effective Date
New Minimum Salary Threshold
Automatic Adjustment Provision
Highly Compensated Employee Compensation
Nondiscretionary Payment to Meet Salary Threshold
Actions Employers Can Take Now
2
2
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Effective Date
December 1, 2016
Approximately 180 days from issuance of the finalregulations
EFFECTIVE DATE
DECEMBER 1, 2016
3
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
New Minimum Salary Threshold $913 a week
More than 2x current $455 a week
$1,826 biweekly
$1,978 semi-monthly
$3,956 monthly
$47,476 annually
Applies to Executive, Administrative, Professional andComputer Employee Exemptions
4
3
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
New Minimum Salary Threshold
40th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time salariedworkers in the lowest wage census region (South)
Census Region 40th Percentile of Earnings ofFull-Time Salaried Workers
(4th Quarter 2015)South $913
Midwest $994
Northeast $1,036
West $1,050
All Census Regions $972
5
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Automatic Adjustment Provision
New minimum salary threshold will be automaticallyadjusted every 3 years based on the 40th percentile ofweekly earnings of full-time salaried workers in thelowest wage census region
Proposed regulations had considered an annual adjustment
6
4
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Automatic Adjustment Provision
January 1, 2020 is first adjustment effective date
Wage growth analysis in the South projects new salarylevel of $984 per week ($51,168 annually) in 2020
Updated salary threshold to be published at least 150days before effective date
7
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Highly Compensated Employee(HCE) Compensation Total annual compensation level = 90th percentile of earnings of
full-time salaried workers nationally
$134,004 annually, based on 4th quarter of 2015
Must be paid at least $913 per week
No change to annual “catch up” payment at the end of the year orwithin one month after the end of year
Total Annual Compensation Adjusted Every 3 Years EffectiveJanuary 1, 2020
Estimated HCE total annual compensationas of January 1, 2020 is $147,524
8
5
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Nondiscretionary Payment to MeetSalary Threshold
10% of minimum salary may be nondiscretionary bonus,incentive, and commission payments
Nondiscretionary payments must be paid quarterly or morefrequently
“Catch up” payment to meet 10% must be by made by nextpay period after end of quarter
“Catch up” payment counts only toward prior quarter’ssalary amount and not quarter in which paid
9
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
The Salary Basis Test
Paid on a “salary basis” means—
Employee must receive each pay period a predeterminedamount constituting all or part of the employee’scompensation; and
The predetermined amount may not be reduced because ofvariations in the quality or quantity of work performed
Subject to a few permissible deductions, employee must bepaid full salary regardless of number of hours or days worked
Do not have to pay if no work performed during theworkweek
10
6
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
No Salary Requirements
Salary Level and Salary Basis Tests Do Not Apply To:
Outside sales exempt employees
Practicing physicians
Practicing attorneys
Teachers
Computer exempt employees paid at least $27.63 per hour
11
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Primary Duties Test
There were no changes to the primary duties test
No new specific occupational examples provided
… at least for now…
12
7
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Actions Employers Can Take Now
Evaluate jobs likely to be impacted by new regulations
Consider whether positions below $47,476 shouldreceive a salary increase or be reclassified as non-exempt
Consider creation of new pay grades/job titles
13
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Actions Employers Can Take Now
Consider pay and rate for jobs to be reclassified
Assess impact of reclassification on:
Benefit programs
Increased compensation costs
Managing overtime
Morale and stigma of non-exempt classification
Inconsistent classifications (e.g., based on geography)
14
8
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Concerns to Address
“Off-the-clock” work performed by reclassifiedemployees to get work done
Temptation to use independent contractors, temporaryemployees
Possible wage compression concern
15
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Actions Employers Can Take Now
Consider alternatives to raising the salary level
Fluctuating workweek method of payment
BELO agreements
16
9
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Actions Employers Can Take Now
Devise communication plan for affected employees
Train affected employees (and managers) ontimekeeping and other policies
Modify HR, payroll processing and IT systems
17
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Illinois Minimum Wage Lawand the New Part 541 Rules
Similar concepts – exemptions from IMWL for “whitecollar” and outside salespersons
Illinois employers must comply with both federal andIllinois law
Illinois lags behind new federal regulations – at leastfor now
10
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Congressional and Other Challenges
Protecting Workplace Advancement and OpportunityAct (H.R. 4773 and S. 2707)
Congressional Review Act Resolution
Amendments to Appropriations Bills
Possible Litigation
Administrative Procedure Act
Regulatory Impact Analysis
19
1
Trade Secrets Protection With Teeth:The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016
.
ogletreedeakins.com
Presented by
Tobias E. Schlueter
© 2016, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Overview of IssuesI. Background
A. Light Reading
B. Where Does the DTSA Fit in the Current Landscape?
C. Why is it Important?
II. DTSA’s Key Provisions
A. Ex Parte Seizure
B. Immunities / Notice Provisions
C. How DTSA Contrasts with State Law
III. What Should You Do Now?
A. Audit Trade Secret Protections
B. Review and Enhance Onboarding and Exit Processes
C. Revise Agreements and Policies
D. Act Promptly When Issues Arise
2
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Light Reading…
3
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Where Does DTSA Fit In CurrentLandscape?
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Why is the DTSA Important?
Gets Litigants StraightInto Federal Court!
Provides New Tools
4
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Ex Parte Seizure of Property
Without notice or answer byaccused
Any time, especially early inthe suit
Specific standards – high bar
Based on evidence at time ofseizure
Penalties for getting it wrong
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Immunities – Section 7(B)Investigation / Private Attorney
(1)(A) - An individual shall not be held criminally or civillyliable under any Federal or State trade secret law for thedisclosure of a trade secret that:
is made in confidence to a Federal, State, or localgovernment official, either directly or indirectly, or toan attorney; and
solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating asuspected violation of law; or
(1)(B) - is made in a complaint or other document filedin a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is madeunder seal.
5
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Immunities – Section 7(B)Whistleblower Action
(2) - An individual who files a lawsuit for retaliation by anemployer for reporting a suspected violation of law maydisclose the trade secret to the attorney of the individualand use the trade secret information in the courtproceeding, if the individual—
files any document containing the trade secret underseal; and
does not disclose the trade secret, except pursuant tocourt order.
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Immunities – NoticeNotice
May 11, 2016
“Employee” = consultantand contractor
State and federal law
Failure to give noticeimpacts DTSA remediesonly
6
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Sample Notice Language
Whether to include in agreement or referto a policy?
Most conservative – mirrors the statute
Conservative – tracks the statute
Less conservative – generalized language
More risky – condensed
30
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Impact on Inevitable Disclosure?
Information someone“merely knows” vs.evidence ofmisappropriation
7
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Contrasts with State Laws
Does not preempt state law – exceptimmunities
Does not preempt other causes of action thatarise under the same common nucleus offacts, unlike the UTSA
Does not require pre-discovery trade secretidentification
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
What Should You Do Now?
Good time to audittrade secret corporatehygiene fromonboarding to exiting
Modify policies(notice)
Modify agreements(notice or reference)
8
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Confidentiality is Key!
Who has access?
What secrecy measuresare in place?
What is the value ofinformation tocompany?
What is the value ofinformation tocompetitors?
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / GreenvilleHouston / Indianapolis / Jackson / Kansas City / Las Vegas / London / Los Angeles / Memphis / Mexico City / Miami / Milwaukee / MinneapolisMorristown / Nashville / New Orleans / New York City / Orange County / Philadelphia / Phoenix / Pittsburgh / Portland / Raleigh / RichmondSan Antonio / San Diego / San Francisco / Seattle / St. Louis / St. Thomas / Stamford / Tampa / Toronto / Torrance / Tucson / Washington, D.C.
www.ogletreedeakins.com
Questions?
CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT MEMORANDUM
FROM: Ogletree Deakins
DATE: May 17, 2016
SUBJECT: Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 Immunity and Notice
IMMUNITY
Section 7 of the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (“DTSA” or “Act”) provides criminal and civil immunity from liability under certain circumstances under both the Act and state law to “employees” who disclose a trade secret to the government or in a court filing. “Employee” is defined under the Act to include “any individual performing work as a contractor or consultant for an employer.” Specifically, the Act provides that employees may disclose trade secrets:
(1) in confidence, either directly or indirectly, to a Federal, State, or local government official, or to an attorney, “solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law,” or
(2) “in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.”
Individuals who file retaliation lawsuits for reporting a suspected violation of law may also use and disclose related trade secrets in the following manner:
(1) the individual may disclose the trade secret to the employee’s attorney, and
(2) the individual may use the information in the court proceeding, as long as the individual files documents containing the trade secret under seal, and does not otherwise disclose the trade secret “except pursuant to court order.”
NOTICE
Employers are required to provide employees with “notice of the immunity” described above “in any contract or agreement with an employee that governs the use of a trade secret or other confidential information.” “Notice” in such contracts or agreements may consist of a “cross-reference to a policy document provided to the employee that sets forth the employer’s reporting policy for a suspected violation of law.” Employers that fail to comply with the notice
Confidential Client MemorandumRE: DTSA of 2016 Immunity and NoticeMay 17, 2016Page 2
requirement waive their right to seek exemplary damages and attorneys’ fees in a misappropriation of trade secrets action under the Act. The notice requirement is also limited to “contracts and agreements that are entered into or updated after the date of enactment of” the DTSA. Finally, the notice requirements do not affect acts that are “otherwise prohibited by law, such as the unlawful access of material by unauthorized means” (e.g., the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act).
NOTICE LANGUAGE OPTIONS
Following are four examples of notice language, starting with the most conservative and ending with the most risky.
Example A: Most Conservative Notice Language—Mirrors the Statute
Because this is a brand new statute, the safest “notice” would be a cut-and-paste of the actual statute:
IMMUNITY FROM LIABILITY FOR CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE OF A TRADE SECRET TO THE GOVERNMENT OR IN A COURT FILING.
(1) IMMUNITY. An individual shall not be held criminally or civilly liable under any Federal or State trade secret law for the disclosure of a trade secret that:
(A) is made
(i) in confidence to a Federal, State, or local government official, either directly or indirectly, or to an attorney; and
(ii) solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law; or
(B) is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.
(2) USE OF TRADE SECRET INFORMATION IN ANTI-RETALIATION LAWSUIT. An individual who files a lawsuit for retaliation by an employer for reporting a suspected violation of law may disclose the trade secret to the attorney of the individual and use the trade secret information in the court proceeding, if the individual
(A) files any document containing the trade secret under seal; and
(B) does not disclose the trade secret, except pursuant to court order.
Confidential Client MemorandumRE: DTSA of 2016 Immunity and NoticeMay 17, 2016Page 3
Example B: Conservative Notice Language—Tracks with the Statute
The following is a fairly robust notice provision that tracks, but does not mirror, the statute:
Immunity under the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016
The federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 provides immunity in certain circumstances to Company employees, contractors, and consultants for limited disclosures of Company Trade Secrets. Specifically, Company employees, contractors, and consultants may disclose Trade Secrets:
(1) in confidence, either directly or indirectly, to a Federal, State, or local government official, or to an attorney, “solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law,” or
(2) “in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.”
Additionally, Company employees, contractors, and consultants who file retaliation lawsuits for reporting a suspected violation of law may also use and disclose related Trade Secrets in the following manner:
(1) the individual may disclose the Trade Secret to his/her attorney, and
(2) the individual may use the information in related court proceeding, as long as the individual files documents containing the Trade Secret under seal, and does not otherwise disclose the trade secret “except pursuant to court order.”
Example C: Less Conservative Notice Language—More Generalized
Company employees, contractors, and consultants may disclose Trade Secrets in confidence, either directly or indirectly, to a Federal, State, or local government official, or to an attorney, solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law, or in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal. Additionally, Company employees, contractors, and consultants who file retaliation lawsuits for reporting a suspected violation of law may disclose related Trade Secrets to their attorney and use them in related court proceedings, as long as the individual files documents containing the Trade Secret under seal and does not otherwise disclose the Trade Secret except pursuant to court order.
Confidential Client MemorandumRE: DTSA of 2016 Immunity and NoticeMay 17, 2016Page 4
Example D: More Risky Notice Language—Condensed
This is another example of an even more minimalist approach to the notice provision.
Employee shall not be held criminally or civilly liable under any Federal or State trade secret law for the disclosure of a Trade Secret that: (1) is made (a) in confidence to a Federal, State, or local government official, either directly or indirectly, or to an attorney, and (b) solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law; or (2) is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal. Disclosures to attorneys, made under seal, or pursuant to court order are also protected in certain circumstances under 18 U.S.C. 1833.
Please note that in this last example, the language in Section 7(b)(2) of the Act is only referred to in passing as a way to avoid mentioning a “retaliation lawsuit” directly. We cannot say whether, in the circumstances covered by this subsection, this notice would survive a challenge. It is also important to remember that the notice provision only affects an employer’s ability to recoverexemplary damages and attorneys’ fees in a misappropriation of trade secrets claim under the Act.
* * *
RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL SEC WHISTLEBLOWER LANGUAGE
(For U.S. Public Companies and SEC Regulated Entities)
While not required by the Act, we recommend adding the following language for employers thatdo not already have whistleblower language in an ethics policy. This language can be placeddirectly after any of the examples above.
Nothing herein is intended to be or will be construed to prevent, impede, or interfere with an employee’s right to respond accurately and fully to any question, inquiry, or request for information regarding the Company or his or her employment with the Company when required by legal process, or from initiating communications directly with, or responding to any inquiry from, or providing truthful testimony and information to, anyFederal, State, or other regulatory authority in the course of an investigation or proceeding authorized by law and carried out by such agency. Employees are not required to contact the Company regarding the subject matter of any such communications before they engage in such communications.
* * *
Confidential Client MemorandumRE: DTSA of 2016 Immunity and NoticeMay 17, 2016Page 5
PLEASE NOTE: The above examples are not intended to be used without consulting with an Ogletree attorney who can examine your particular circumstances and the proper application of notice language. Questions may be directed to:
John C. Glancy: john.glancy@ogletreedeakins.com; 864.240.8278,
Tobias Schlueter: tobias.schlueter@ogletreedeakins.com; 312.558.1225, or
Danielle Ochs: danielle.ochs@ogletreedeakins.com; 415.536.3429
24852273.1
Michael H. CramerShareholder Chicago
312-558-1240
michael.cramer@ogletreedeakins.com
Mr. Cramer counsels and represents employers on a variety of labor and employment-related legal
matters. He has advised clients ranging from small non-profits to Fortune 500 companies on
employment matters, negotiated cost-effective resolutions to troubling disputes, and litigated to victory.
Based on extensive interviews of in-house attorneys, the BTI Consulting Group named Mr. Cramer a BTI
Client Service All-Star—one of just 29 Labor and Employment attorneys in the United States to achieve
this recognition in 2015. Based on other peer surveys, Mr. Cramer has achieved Martindale-Hubbell’s
highest peer review rating (AV), and repeatedly has been named among the Best Lawyers in America, a
Leading Lawyer, and an Illinois Super Lawyer. Mr. Cramer has been elected to The College of Labor
and Employment Lawyers, an organization of labor and employment attorneys in practice for more than
20 years who meet “the highest professional qualifications and ethical standards.”
Mr. Cramer’s employment litigation practice includes discrimination and harassment cases, wage and
hour collective actions, and restrictive covenant litigation. Examples of his work include:
Defending employers including retail chains, restaurant chains, manufacturers, and staffing
companies in numerous class and collective actions involving alleged wage and hour violations;
Defeating a former employee’s attempt to certify a class of more than 200 employees alleging
denial of overtime pay, then defeating the remaining plaintiff’s claims at trial;
Winning summary judgment on behalf of employers in numerous discrimination and retaliation suits;
Defeating a 27-count federal lawsuit brought by the former chief executive of a non-profit
organization against the entity and each of its board members;
Defeating an age and sex discrimination suit in a federal jury trial;
Defeating a former high-ranking executive's suit claiming he was entitled to millions of dollars under
an executive severance plan; and
Assisting clients to reduce EEOC charges and lawsuits by counseling HR and management on
policies and potentially volatile disciplinary and termination decisions.
Mr. Cramer often conducts training for clients’ executives, HR professionals and entire workforces on
topics including anti-harassment, internal investigations, workplace bullying, and professionalism. He is
a frequent speaker and writer on employment law topics through organizations including the Association
of Corporate Counsel, the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education, and the Northern Illinois
Society for Human Resources Management.
Admitted to PracticeIllinois
U.S. District Court, Central and Northern
Districts of Illinois
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of
Michigan
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
EducationJ.D., University of Michigan Law School,
1988
B.A., with distinction, University of
Michigan, 1985
Tobias E. SchlueterShareholder Chicago
312-558-1225
tobias.schlueter@ogletreedeakins.com
Admitted to PracticeIllinois
U.S. District Court, Central and Northern
Districts of Illinois
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
EducationJ.D., cum laude, The John Marshall Law
School, 2002
B.A., Political Science, Franciscan
University, 1996
Mr. Schlueter is a strategic advocate and litigator for businesses in employment (including
discrimination, retaliation, wage & hour, ADA, FMLA etc.) and unfair competition matters (including
restrictive covenants (non-compete, non-solicit and confidentiality), trade secrets, duties of loyalty,
tortious interference, and conspiracy, etc.). Mr. Schlueter has a proven track record in litigating high
stakes matters involving temporary restraining orders and other injunctive relief. He also has significant
experience trying FINRA arbitration matters. He is a member of the steering committee for Ogletree’s
Unfair Competition and Trade Secrets Group.
Mr. Schlueter was selected as a Best Lawyer in America for 2017 in Employment Law – Management.
He was named as an Illinois Rising Star for 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. The Rising Star distinction is
awarded to attorneys under the age of 40 based on 12 indicators of peer recognition and professional
achievement.