Post on 24-May-2020
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences (JMES)
ISSN (Print): 2289-4659; e-ISSN: 2231-8380; Volume 1, pp. 99-112, December 2011
© Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15282/jmes.1.2011.9.0009
99
AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON HEAT TRANSFER AND FRICTION
FACTOR OF AL2O3 NANOFLUID
L. Syam Sundar1
and K.V. Sharma2
1Centre for Energy Studies, JNTUH College of Engineering, Kukatpally, Hyderabad
500085, India, Tel./Fax. +91-40-32408715/+91-40-23058720
E-mail: sslingala@rediffmail.com 2Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan,
Pahang, Malaysia Tel./Fax. +6-09-4242324/+6-09-4242202
E-mail: kvsharmajntu@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
This paper reports experimental investigations of fully developed laminar convective
heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of different volume concentrations of
Al2O3 nanofluid in a plain tube, fitted with different twist ratios of twisted tape inserts.
Experiments are conducted with water and nanofluid in the range of ,2200Re700
particle volume concentration of 5.00 %, and twisted tape twist ratios of
15/0 DH . The heat transfer coefficient of the nanofluid is high compared with
water, and further enhancement of heat transfer is observed with the twisted tape inserts.
Pressure drop is slightly increased with the inserts, but is comparatively negligible. A
generalized regression equation is developed based on the experimental data for the
estimation of the Nusselt number and friction factor for water and nanofluid in a plain
tube with twisted tape inserts.
Keywords: forced convection in a tube, aluminum oxide nanofluid, twisted tape inserts,
heat transfer enhancement, nanofluid friction factor.
INTRODUCTION
The low thermal conductivity of conventional heat transfer fluids, such as water, oil,
and ethylene glycol, is a serious limitation to the improvement of the performance and
compactness of many engineered products, such as heat exchangers. Initial experiments
have been performed with small-sized metallic particles, which possess high thermal
conductivity, to enhance heat transfer. Early research on the suspension of these
micrometer-sized particles identified problems associated with dispersion and flow. To
overcome this, nano-sized particles were developed, dispersed in a base liquid, and the
thermal conductivity enhancement obtained (Choi, 1995). The thermo-physical
properties of different volume concentrations of nanofluid have been explained
(Masuda, Ebata, Teramae, & Hishinuma, 1993; Pak & Cho, 1998; Eastman, Choi, Li,
Soyez, Thompson, & DiMelfi, 1999; Eastman, Choi, Li, Yu, & Thompson, 2001; Lee,
Choi, Li, & Eastman, 1999; Wang, Xu, & Choi, 1999; Das, Putra, Thiesen, & Roetzel,
2003).
The enhancement of thermal conductivity is confirmed by using Al2O3, TiO2,
and Cu nanoparticles dispersed in water (Pak & Cho, 1998; Xuan & Li, 2003). They
also estimated the heat transfer coefficients and pressure drop in tubes, under turbulent
flow with nanofluids at different concentrations. The heat transfer coefficients are
observed to increase with concentration when compared with base liquid water. The
An Experimental Study on Heat Transfer and Friction Factor of Al2O3 Nanofluid
100
authors have presented regression equations for the estimation of the Nusselt numbers.
Numerical studies have been undertaken (Namburu, Das, Tanguturi, & Vajjha, 2009)
with CuO, Al2O3, and SiO2 nanofluids under turbulent flow, which obtained higher heat
transfer coefficients compared with water. Experimentally, Wen and Ding (2004)
observed that Al2O3 nanoparticles, when dispersed in water, show enhancements in the
coefficients of laminar convective heat transfer. Experiments conducted by Heris,
Esfahany and Etemad (2007) with Al2O3/water nanofluid in the laminar flow range of
Reynolds number, subject to isothermal wall boundary conditions, predicted higher
values of heat transfer. The enhancements were found to increase with Reynolds
number as well as with particle concentration. Numerical studies have been undertaken
in the laminar range with Al2O3/water Al2O3/ethylene glycol nanofluids and the heat
transfer enhancement obtained.
The numerical analysis of laminar flow heat transfer of Al2O3 /ethylene glycol
and Al2O3/water nanofluids in tubes has been reported (Palm, Roy, & Nguyen, 2004;
Roy, Nguyen, & Lajoie, 2004) and it was observed that wall shear stress increased with
volume concentration and Reynolds number. The enhancement of heat transfer with
flow of nanofluids in a tube has been summarized by Wang and Majumdar (2007), and
Kakaç and Pramuanjaroenkij (2009). Passive enhancement of heat transfer can also be
achieved with the use of twisted tape inserts for flows in a tube or duct. Heat transfer
enhancements have been determined through experiment and numerical analysis for the
flow of single-phase fluids in a tube, which are valid for a wide range of Reynolds
number (Smithberg & Landis, 1964; Lopina & Bergles, 1969; Lecjaks, Machac, & Sir,
1987; Sarma, Subramanyam, Kishore, Dharma Rao, & Kakac, 2003). Experiments have
determination the heat transfer using twisted tape inserts in a tube with Al2O3 nanofluid
at different volume concentrations (Sharma, Sundar, & Sarma, 2009; Sundar & Sharma,
2010). They have presented empirical correlations for the estimation of the Nusselt
number and friction factor in the transition and turbulent flow range. The equation
proposed by them has the flexibility to estimate the Nusselt number for the flow of
water or nanofluid in a plain tube and with twisted tape inserts. Nanofluid heat transfer
and pressure drop in the laminar range of Reynolds number with twisted tape inserts has
not yet been estimated. The experimental determination of these parameters is
undertaken in the present study.
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND PROCEDURE
The schematic diagram of the experimental setup is shown in Figure 1a. The fluid flows
through a copper tube of 0.012 m diameter to a chiller or collecting tank and a storage
tank under the action of a pump. The copper tube is heated uniformly by wrapping it in
two 20-gauge nichrome heaters, having a resistance of 53.5 per meter length and
1000 W maximum rating, and subject throughout the entire test section to a constant
heat flux boundary condition. The space between the test section and the outer casing is
stuffed with rock wool insulation to minimize heat loss to the atmosphere. The 1.5-m
length test section is provided with five K-type thermocouples; three brazed to the
surface at distances of 0.375, 0.75, and 1.125 m from the entry and two more located to
measure the working fluid inlet and outlet temperatures. All these thermocouples have
0.1 °C resolution and they are calibrated before fixing them at the specified locations.
The aspect ratio of the test section is sufficiently large for the flow to be
hydrodynamically developed. The fluid is forced through the test section under the
action of a pump; the suction side is connected to a storage tank. The storage tank is
Syam Sundar and Sharma / Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences 1(2011) 99-112
101
made of stainless steel with a capacity of 30 liters. The liquid, which is heated in the test
section, is allowed to cool by passing it through a chiller. The liquid is then gravity-fed
into the storage tank. The provision of the chiller reduces the time required to achieve
steady state conditions.
The twisted tapes are made in the laboratory from a 1-mm thick and 0.01-m
radius aluminum strip, as shown in Figure 1b. The dimensions of the twisted tape inserts
are shown in Table 1. The two ends of a strip were held on a lathe, one at the headstock
end and the other at the tailstock end by special devices made in the laboratory. The
strip was then subjected to twisting by turning the chuck manually. Four twist ratios of
H/D = 5, 10, and 15 were fabricated. Twisted tapes are fitted tightly into the tube and
the tape fin effect is neglected.
Figure 1a. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup
Figure 1b. Full-length twisted tape insert inside a tube
An Experimental Study on Heat Transfer and Friction Factor of Al2O3 Nanofluid
102
Once the experimental setup is assembled, the storage tank is filled with the
working fluid. Experiments are conducted with water and nanofluids to determine the
friction factor and heat transfer coefficients for flow in a tube. The procedure for the
preparation of nanofluids is followed as described by Sundar, Ramanathan, Sharma and
Sekhar Babu (2007). Nanofluids at different volume concentrations of 0.02%, 0.1%, and
0.5% are used in conducting the experiments.
Table 1. Dimensions of twisted tape inserts
S. No. Parameter Twist Ratio, H/D, m
5 10 15
1 H (Width) 0.05 0.1 0.15
2 D (Diameter) 0.01 0.01 0.01
The working fluid flow rate in the test section is evaluated from the flow meter
readings and validated manually. The properties of the fluid are evaluated at the mean
temperature, as explained by Sundar and Sharma (2008). The required data for the
estimation of the heat transfer coefficients and friction factor are recorded at different
flow Reynolds numbers, ranging from 700 to 2200, with flow of water and nanofluid in
a tube. A similar procedure is adopted for flow with longitudinal strip inserts and
relevant comparisons are made. The heat transfer coefficient is estimated using
Newton’s law of cooling.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Nusselt number of water and nanofluid in plain tube
The balance between the energy supplied by heating and the energy absorbed by the
flowing liquid is established using Eqs. (1) and (2) for each set of data and the
experimental heat transfer coefficient estimated using Eq. (3).
IVQ (Energy supplied) (1)
iTTCmQ 0 (Energy absorbed) (2)
meanwall
ExpTTA
Qh
, LDA i ,
k
DhNu i
Exp (3)
The deviation between the values obtained with Eqs. (1) and (2) is less than
±2.5% and the heat loss to the atmosphere is neglected. The experimental Nusselt
numbers of the fully developed laminar flow with different volume concentrations of
nanofluid is shown in Figure 2, together with the data for water. From this figure, it can
be observed that the Nusslet number increases with an increase in the volume
concentration of nanofluid under the same Reynolds number. The reason for heat
transfer enhancement of the nanofluid is due to the effect of thermo-physical properties.
Comparatively, the thermo-physical properties are greater for the nanofluid.
Syam Sundar and Sharma / Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences 1(2011) 99-112
103
Figure 2. Experimental Nusselt number for water and for different volume
concentrations of nanofluid
The equation for the estimation of the Nusselt number for different volume
concentrations of Al2O3 nanofluid in a plain tube under fully developed laminar flow is
obtained with an average deviation (AD) of 2.46% and standard deviation (SD) of
3.23%, given by:
07094.03.05860.0
Re 001.0PrRe2624.0 gNu
(4)
Valid in the range ,2200Re700 5.00 %,
The values estimated from Eq. (4) are shown in Figure 3, together with the experimental
Nusselt number of water and nanofluid.
An Experimental Study on Heat Transfer and Friction Factor of Al2O3 Nanofluid
104
Figure 3. Experimental Nusselt number compared with Eq. (4)
Nusselt number of water and nanofluid in plain tube with twisted tape inserts
Experiments with twisted tape inserts are conducted with water and nanofluid following
the procedure explained earlier for flow in a tube. The procedure is repeated with tapes
of different twist ratios: 5, 10, and 15. The equation (Sarma et al., 2003) based on
theoretical analysis and obtained with a standard deviation of 4% and average deviation
of 3% for the estimation of the Nusselt number, is given by:
12.4
3.055.0
Reg 0.1PrRe2036.0
H
DNu (5)
This is valid in the range 3000Re100 , 400Pr5 , 105.2 DH for pure
liquids.
The experimental Nusselt number of water and nanofluid for flow in a tube with
twisted tape inserts is presented in Figure 4; however, no literature is available with
which to compare the data. From the figure, it can be observed that higher heat transfer
rates are obtained with twisted tape inserts compared with nanofluid flow in a tube. The
experimental Nusselt number of water and nanofluid in a plain tube with different twist
ratios of twisted tape inserts is shown in Figure 5.
Syam Sundar and Sharma / Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences 1(2011) 99-112
105
Figure 4. Comparison of present experimental data of water and nanofluid with twisted
tape inserts with data available in the literature
Figure 5. Experimental Nusselt number of water and nanofluid in plain tube with
twisted tape inserts
An Experimental Study on Heat Transfer and Friction Factor of Al2O3 Nanofluid
106
Hence, the present data for the flow of water and Al2O3 nanofluid in a tube with
twisted tape inserts is subjected to regression and the equation is obtained with an
average deviation (AD) of 4.14% and standard deviation (SD) of 5.23%, given by:
02395.0
07060.03.05004.0
Reg 001.0001.0PrRe5652.0
H
DNu (6)
This is valid in the range 2200Re700 %5.00 , 5.6Pr4.4 ,
150 DH ( 0 for water, 0DH for plain tube). The values of the Nusselt
numbers estimated with Eq. (6) are in good agreement with the experimental values
shown in Figure 6; thus, validating the developed regression equation.
Figure 6. Comparison of experimental Nusselt numbers with Eq. (6)
Friction Factor of Water and Nanofluid in a Plain Tube
The friction factor can be determined from the relation:
2
2V
D
L
Pf
(7)
Syam Sundar and Sharma / Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences 1(2011) 99-112
107
where the single-phase fluid friction factor is (Moody, 1944):
Re
64f (8)
The experimental friction factor of water and different volume concentrations of
nanofluid estimated from Eq. (7) is compared with the values estimated from Eq. (8)
and shown in Figure 7. It is evident that the friction factor values for the nanofluid are
all the same as the values for water, which means that with the addition of solid
particles in the base fluid there is not much enhancement of the friction factor.
Figure 7. Comparison of experimental friction factor in plain tube with Moody’s (1944)
equation
A generalized regression equation is developed for the estimation of the friction
factor of water and different volume concentrations of nanofluid in a plain tube under
fully developed laminar flow conditions with an average deviation (AD) of 4.552% and
standard deviation (SD) of 5.799%, given by:
01.09316.0
Re )001.0(Re54.39
gf
(9)
This is valid for 2200Re700 , 5.6Pr4.4 , 5.00 .
An Experimental Study on Heat Transfer and Friction Factor of Al2O3 Nanofluid
108
The values of the friction factor estimated with Eq. (9) are in good agreement
with the experimental values shown in Figure 8; thus, validating the developed
equation.
Figure 8. Comparison of experimental friction factor with Eq. (9)
Friction Factor of Water and Nanofluid with and without Twisted Tape Inserts
Equation (7) is used to estimate the experimental friction factor of water and nanofluid
in a plain tube with twisted tape inserts, and the data are presented in Figure 9; however,
no literature is available with which to compare the data. It is evident that higher friction
factors are obtained with twisted tape inserts than with flow in a tube either for water or
for nanofluid.
The present data of friction factor are subjected to regression and obtained with
an average deviation (AD) of 4.886% and standard deviation (SD) of 6.221%, given by:
006120.0
01.09641.0
Re 001.0001.0Re08.52
H
Df g (10)
This is valid for the range 2200Re700 , 5.5Pr4.4 , 5.00 , 15/0 DH
( 0 for water, 0DH for plain tube). The values of friction factor estimated with
Eq. (10) are in good agreement with the experimental values shown in Figure 10; thus,
validating the developed equation.
Syam Sundar and Sharma / Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences 1(2011) 99-112
109
Figure 9. Friction factor of water and nanofluid in plain tube with twisted tape inserts.
Figure 10. Comparison of experimental friction factor with Eq. (10).
An Experimental Study on Heat Transfer and Friction Factor of Al2O3 Nanofluid
110
CONCLUSIONS
The enhancement of heat transfer in a plain tube with 0.5% volume concentration of
32OAl nanofluid compared with water for a Reynolds number of 700 and 2200 is
46.52% and 47.59%, respectively. The enhancement of friction factor in a plain tube
with 0.5% volume concentration of 32OAl nanofluid when compared with water for a
Reynolds number of 700 and 2200 is 1.042 and 1.068 times, respectively. The heat
transfer coefficient of 0.5% volume concentration 32OAl nanofluid with twisted tape
inserts having 5/ DH is 14.60% and 29.50% greater for a Reynolds number of 700
and 2200, respectively, compared with the same fluid, and 69.14% and 89.76% greater
compared with water flowing in a plain tube. The friction factor of 0.5% volume
concentration 32OAl nanofluid with twisted tape inserts having 5/ DH is 1.0958
times greater for a Reynolds number of 700 and 1.0652 times greater for a Reynolds
number of 2200 when compared with water and 1.512 and 1.0412 times greater
compared with the same fluid flowing in a tube. The use of twisted tape inserts is
advantageous at higher Reynolds numbers based on the values of friction factor and
heat transfer compared with flow in a tube either for water or for nanofluid. The use of
the nanofluid enhances the heat transfer coefficient with no significant enhancement in
pressure drop compared with water in the range tested. The experimental data of friction
and Nusselt number of water and 32OAl nanofluid for flow in a plain tube and with
longitudinal strip insert can be presented, respectively, as:
006120.0
01.09641.0
Re 001.0001.0Re08.52
H
Df g
02395.0
07060.03.05004.0
Reg 001.0001.0PrRe5652.0
H
DNu .
REFERENCES
Choi, S. U. S. (1995). Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluid with nanoparticles. In:
Siginer, D.A., Wang, H.P. (Eds.), Developments and Applications of Non-
Newtonian Flows, FED-V.231/ MD-V.66. ASME, New York, 99–105.
Das, S. K, Putra, N., Thiesen, P., & Roetzel, W. (2003). Temperature dependence of
thermal conductivity enhancement for nanofluids. Journal of Heat Transfer,
125, 567–574.
Eastman, J. A., Choi, S. U. S., Li, S., Soyez, G., Thompson, L. J., & DiMelfi, R. J.
(1999). Novel thermal properties of nanostructured materials. Journal of
Metastable Nanocrystal Materials, 2(6), 629–634.
Eastman, J. A., Choi, S. U. S., Li, S., Yu, W., & Thompson, L. J. (2001). Anomalously
increase effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids
containing copper nanoparticles. Applied Physics Letter, 78(6), 718–720.
Heris, S. Z., Esfahany, M. N., & Etemad, G. S. (2007). Experimental investigation of
convective heat transfer of Al2O3/water nanofluid in circular tube. International
Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 28, 203–210.
Syam Sundar and Sharma / Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences 1(2011) 99-112
111
Kakaç, S., & Pramuanjaroenkij, A. (2009). Review of convective heat transfer
enhancement with nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer, 52, 3187–3196.
Lecjaks, Z., Machac, I., & Sir, J. (1987). Heat transfer to a Newtonian liquid flowing
through a tube with an internal helical element. International Chemical
Engineering, 27, 210–217.
Lee. S., Choi, S. U. S., Li, S., & Eastman, J. A. (1999). Measuring thermal conductivity
of fluids containing oxide nanoparticles. Journal of heat transfer, 121, 208–289.
Lopina, R. F., & Bergles, A. E. (1969). Heat transfer and pressure drop in tape-
generated swirl flow of single phase water. Journal of Heat Transfer, 91, 434–
442.
Masuda, H., Ebata, A., Teramae, K., & Hishinuma, N. (1993). Altration of thermal
conductivity and viscosity of liquid by dispersing ultra-fine particles (dispersion
of γ-Al2O3, SiO2 and TiO2 ultra-fine particles). Netsu Bussei (in Japanese), 4(4),
227–233.
Moody, L. F. (1944). Friction factor for pipe flow. Transactions of ASME, 66, 671–
684.
Namburu, P. K., Das, D. K., Tanguturi, K. M., & Vajjha, R. K. (2009). Numerical study
of turbulent flow and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids considering
variable properties. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 48(2), 290–302.
Pak, B. C., & Cho, Y. I. (1998). Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed
fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Experimental Heat Transfer, 11,
151–170.
Palm, S. J., Roy, G., & Nguyen, C. T. (2004). Heat transfer enhancement in radial flow
cooling system-using nanofluid. In: Proceeding of the ICHMT Inter. Symp.
Advance Comp. Heat Transfer, Norway, CHT-04-121.
Roy, G., Nguyen, C. T., & Lajoie, P. R. (2004). Numerical investigation of laminar flow
and heat transfer in a radial flow cooling system with the use of nanofluids.
Superlattices and Microstructures, 35(3), 497–511.
Sarma, P. K., Subramanyam, T., Kishore, P. S., Dharma Rao, V., & Kakac, S. (2003).
Laminar convective heat transfer with twisted tape inserts in a tube,
International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 42, 821–828.
Sharma, K. V., Sundar, L. S., & Sarma, P. K. (2009). Estimation of heat transfer
coefficient and friction factor in the transition flow with low volume
concentration of Al2O3 nanofluid flowing in a circular tube and with twisted tape
insert. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 36, 503–507.
Smithberg, E., & Landis, F. (1964). Friction and forced convective heat transfer
characteristics in tube with twisted-tape swirl generators. Journal of Heat
Transfer, 86, 39–49.
Sundar, L. S., Ramanathan, S., Sharma, K. V., & Sekhar Babu, P. (2007). Temperature
dependent flow characteristics of Al2O3 nanofluid. International Journal of
Nanotechnology and Applications, 1(2), 35–44.
Sundar, L. S., & Sharma, K. V. (2008). Thermal conductivity enhancement of
nanoparticles in distilled water. International Journal of Nanoparticles, 1(1),
66–77.
Sundar, L. S., & Sharma, K. V. (2010). Turbulent heat transfer and friction factor of
Al2O3 nanofluid in circular tube with twisted tape inserts. International Journal
of Heat and Mass Transfer, 53, 1409–1416.
An Experimental Study on Heat Transfer and Friction Factor of Al2O3 Nanofluid
112
Wang, X, Q., & Mujumdar, A. S. (2007). Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a
review. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 46, 1–19.
Wang, X., Xu, X., & Choi, S. U. S. (1999). Thermal conductivity of nanoparticles-fluid
mixture. Journal of Thermophysics Heat Transfer, 13(4), 474–480.
Wen, D., & Ding, Y. (2004). Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of
nanofluid at the entrance region under laminar flow conditions. International
Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 47(24), 5181–5188.
Xuan, Y., & Li, Q. (2003). Investigation on convective heat transfer and flow features
of nanofluids. Journal of Heat Transfer, 125, 151–155.
Nomenclature
A area, m2
C specific heat, J/kg K
D inner diameter of the tube, m
f friction factor
h convective heat transfer coefficient, W/m2 K
I current, Amp
k thermal conductivity, W/m K
L length of the tube, m
m mass flow rate, kg/s
Nu Nusselt number, khD /
Pr Prandtl Number, kC /
Re Reynolds number, D
m4
T temperature, °C
V voltage, volts
v velocity, m/sec
Greek symbols
P pressure drop across the tube
volume concentration of nanoparticles, %
dynamic viscosity, kg/m2 s
density, kg/m3
Subscripts
Exp experimental
h hydraulic diameter
i inner diameter
m mean
Reg regression
W wall