Post on 27-Mar-2015
AMERICAN JUDGES ASSOCIATIONLAHAINA, HAWAIISEPTEMBER 2008
RICHARD VAN DUIZENDPRINCIPAL COURT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT
NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Court Funding: Lessons From the Last Recession
Questions to Consider
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
How bad were court budget deficits in the last recession?
How did budget cutbacks affect judicial services to the public?
What are the budget forecasts through 2010?
What did we learn from the last recession that might help courts develop strategies be to address this next round of budget shortages?
Where Did Increased State Spending Occur in the 1990’s?
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Category Percent Change
Total General Expenditure 28.2%Elementary & Secondary Education 30.7%
Medicaid 78.8%Higher Education 17.9%Judicial 49.0%Corrections 39.0%
Growth in State Government Spending in 1990's
Source: Donald J. Boyd, Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government
Note: This is measured per capita. Figures are adjusted for inflation and population growth
What did the financial picture look like from FY 2001-2004?
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
26 states had less revenue than estimated in 2003
45 states expected budget deficits in 200439 states exceeded budget spending
levels for FY 2003Most states had budget deficits equivalent
to 11 percent of total expenditures
Council of State Governments, State Fiscal Crisis: Critical information for State Decision Makers, April 2003
What caused the fiscal crisis in the last recession?
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Spending Increases Occurred at the Same Time as Tax Cuts Were Enacted
How could states cut taxes while increasing spending and still maintain balanced budgets? Sales taxes increased as consumer spending increased State income taxes increased as people’s incomes
increased
States enacted permanent tax decreasesStock Market lossesSeptember 11Per capita increase in state spendingCouncil of State Governments, State Fiscal Crisis: Critical information for State Decision Makers, April 2003
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Adequacy of State Judicial Branch Current Appropriations, As Rated by Court
Administrators
FY 2001
28.9%
39.5%
26.3%
5.3%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Inadequate Adequate Good Very Good
Note: N = 38.
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Adequacy of State Judicial Branch Current
Appropriations, As Rated by Court Administrators
FY 2003
52%
20%
12% 12%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Inadequate Adequate Good Very Good
(Note: N = 32)
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Actions taken (35)No actions taken (includes DC) (6)Not participating (10)
92% of These States Took Actions to Curb Spending Because of Funding Restrictions During 2003.
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
budget restriction from previous year (20)other (31)
Nearly half of the responding states reported budget restrictions for FY 2003
Virtually every state reported significant public impact from the crisis.
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Alabama: 475 court positions cut in 2004California: early release of prisoners—47,000
from Los Angeles aloneNew Hampshire: suspended jury trials for a
monthOregon: closed courts to the public on FridaysMinnesota cut funding to crisis centers meaning
less help to victims of domestic violenceNew York: cuts to Rochester Public Interest
Laws Office meant 200 people would receive no legal help
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
WHAT IS IN STORE FOR STATE BUDGETS THROUGH 2010?
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG 12
Source: Pew Center on the States
14 State Courts Systems Face 0 to 10% Budget Reduction in FY 2008-09.
NCSC survey of State Court Administrators, May 2008, forty-two states
responding WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
What's Causing State Budget Woes This Time?
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Bursting of the housing market Sales tax revenues decline Property tax revenues, Local governments will be looking to states for
relief
Past policies have left states vulnerable Unaffordable past tax reductions Tax cuts being phased in over next few years Structural budget imbalance Use of one-time revenue and budget gimmicks Inadequate rainy-day funds
What Tactics and Strategies Did State Courts Implement Last
Time?
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
State Strategies
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
State Strategies (n=32)
94%
59%
88%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cut spending Increase revenue Enhanced efficiency
Most Frequent Short-Term Actions to Curtail Court Expenses (2003)
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
1. Hiring delay or freeze (27 states)2. Permanent layoff’s (7)3. Delay pay raises (10)4. Reduce training (18)5. Travel restrictions – out state (24)6. More use of electronic communications (22)7. Reduce capital expenditures (28)8. Cut funding to problem solving courts (10)9. Enhancement of revenue streams (14)10. Invest in automation (12)
Things May Be Worse This Time
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Property taxes, sales taxes and income tax could all be hit
Many states filled the budget shortfall last time by raising fees; there is little room left for new increases
May need to radically redesign services to continue to provide adequate access to the public
Examples of Service Redesign
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Court Services—prioritization, consolidation and elimination of services
Process Efficiencies—centralize and streamline services
Technology—redesign services around IT
State Courts Systems Considering Steps to Adjust Expenditures in FY 2008-09
NCSC survey of State Court Administrators, May 2008, forty-two states
responding WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
What Is NCSC Doing?
WWW.NCSCONLINE.ORG
Templates for re-designing servicesSurvey the depth of the cuts Track solutionsBudget Resource CenterToolkit