Academic State of the District

A Presentation to the Board of Education

October 21, 2010

Mr. Joseph C. Bond

Superintendent of Schools

Dr. Joan K. Lange

Assistant Superintendent of Secondary Education

Dr. Aurelia Henriquez

Assistant Superintendent of Elementary Education

X

4

Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding State Standards (Scoring at Level 3 or 4)

Percent of Suffolk County Students at Levels 3 and 4 on NYS Assessments 2006-2010 in Grades 3-8 using 2009 and 2010 cut scores

In 2010, NYSED changed the scale score required to meet each of the proficiency levels, increasing the number of questions students needed to answer correctly to meet proficiency.

% reaching proficiency using 2009’s cut scores

% reaching proficiency using 2010’s cut scores

46.8%

55.2%

63.4%69.1% 69.5%

75.7%81.8%

87.5% 91.5% 92.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

56.4% 58.4%62.3%

66.8% 63.2%

71.7%73.6%

77.8%84.7% 84.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

ELAMATH

An ELA Raw Score Range Comparison

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

2008 2009 2010

Level 1 level 2 level 3 level 4

A Math Raw Score Range Comparison 2009 & 2010

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

2008 2009 2010

Level 1 level 2 level 3 level 4

35% 36%40% 40%

44% 43%

36%

47%

41%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Hemlock Laurel Park Loretta Park North Elem. North East Oak Park Southeast Southwest Twin Pines

Per

cen

tage

Mee

ting

Pro

ficie

ncy

Elementary Schools

Grade 3 ELA ResultsProficiency 2010

33%37%

41%

55%

41%

34%

52%

37%

43%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Hemlock Laurel Park Loretta Park North Elem. North East Oak Park Southeast Southwest Twin Pines

Per

cen

tage

Mee

ting

Pro

ficie

ncy

Elementary Schools

Grade 4 ELA ResultsProficiency 2010

47%

40%

34%

46%

40% 40%43%

37%

43%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Hemlock Laurel Park Loretta Park North Elem. North East Oak Park Southeast Southwest Twin Pines

Per

cen

tage

Mee

ting

Pro

ficie

ncy

Elementary Schools

Grade 5 ELA ResultsProficiency 2010

49%

37%

46% 46%43%

48% 46%

55%

47% 46%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Hemlock Laurel Park Loretta Park

North Ele. North East Oak Park Southeast Southwest Twin Pines District totals

Per

cen

tage

Mee

ting

Pro

ficie

ncy

Elementary Schools

Grade 3 Math ResultsProficiency 2010

43%

52%54%

71%

49%47%

65%

57%53% 54%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Hemlock Laurel Park Loretta Park North Ele. North East Oak Park Southeast Southwest Twin Pines District totals

Per

cen

tage

Mee

ting

Pro

ficie

ncy

Elementary Schools

Grade 4 Math ResultsProficiency 2010

55%

60%63%

70%

62%60%

50%

57% 58%60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Hemlock Laurel Park Loretta Park North Ele. North East Oak Park Southeast Southwest Twin Pines District totals

Per

cen

tage

Mee

ting

Pro

ficie

ncy

Elementary Schools

Grade 5 Math ResultsProficiency 2010

37%33% 33%

25%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

East Middle North Middle South Middle West Middle

Per

cen

tage

Mee

ting

Pro

ficie

ncy

Middle Schools

Grade 8 ELA ResultsProficiency 2010

Integrated Algebra Regents Results Grade 8