A robust adaptive clustering analysis method for automatic identification of clusters

Post on 26-Jan-2016

44 views 0 download

description

Presenter : Bo- Sheng Wang Authors: P.Y. Mok *, H.Q. Huang, Y.L. Kwok, J.S. Au PR, 2012. A robust adaptive clustering analysis method for automatic identification of clusters. Outlines. Motivation Objectives Methodology Experiments Compary Conclusions Comments. Motivation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of A robust adaptive clustering analysis method for automatic identification of clusters

A robust adaptive clustering analysis method for automatic identification of clusters

Presenter : Bo-Sheng Wang  Authors : P.Y. Mok*, H.Q. Huang, Y.L. Kwok, J.S. Au

PR, 2012

1

Outlines

• Motivation• Objectives• Methodology• Experiments• Compary• Conclusions• Comments

2

Motivation

• Correct cluster numbers do not guarantee that a data set can be properly partitioned in the desired way.

3

Objectives

• The objective of this paper is to propose a robust and adaptive clustering analysis method.

• 1.Produces reliable clustering results

• 2.Identifies the desired cluster number.

4

Methodology-Fuzzy C-mean(FCM)

5

Methodology-Fuzzy C-mean(Example)

6

Methodology-Fuzzy C-mean(Example)

7

Methodology-Fuzzy C-mean(Example)

8

Methodology-Fuzzy C-mean(Example)

9

Mothodology-RAC-FCM

10

Mothodology-RAC-FCM

11

Mothodology-RAC-FCM

12

Mothodology-RAC-FCM

13

Mothodology-Adaptive implementation

14

Experiments-K-mean

15

KM

Experiments-K-mean+RAC-FCM

16

Mothodology-Application

17

Experiments

• When the distribution of cluster number is not stable enough to give the desired number.

Increasing the upper bound of cluster number can.

18

Experiments

19

Experiments

20

How to verification the proposed k parameter?

Experiments

• This paper use the three widely data sets including the Iris data set, Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) data set and Wine data set.

• Step:1.Verified the distribution stability of the cluster number

2.Compared to different cluster validity index methods.

21

Experiments -Iris Data Set

22

Experiments - Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) data set

23

Experiments - Wine data set

24

Experiments -Compary different Data Set

25

Compary-Comparison with the spectral clustering method

26

RAC-FCM Spectral Clustering Method

WIN

Compary-Comparison with cluster ensembles

27

Conclusions

• This paper proposes method no cluster number is needed to define.

• The method is not only robust but also adaptive.

• The method not only identifies the desired cluster number but also ensures reliable clustering results.

28

Comments

• Advantages–We can obtain optimum Result use this method in

cluster analysis.

• Disadvantage– This method is very take the time because of a

program.

• Applications– Cluster Analysis

29