Post on 10-Apr-2018
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
1/59
Company
LOGO
THE LAW OF CONTRACT
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
2/59
Case Study:
Clean and Clear Company (3C), a manufacturing process-designcompany, signed into an equipment-supply contract with HybridMaterial Factory (HMF).
3C agreed to design, supply, and install a cleaning system at HMFfor a contract price of RM 200 000.
This system was invented by 3C based on the technologyinnovation using tiny organisms alongside the very latest membranefiltration techniques to improve liquid or water cleaning technology.
The specifications for the cleaning system stated that theequipment must eliminate ninety-five percent of the particular
chemical waste from the mill's sewage system in order to complywith the requirements of the environmental authority in the area inwhich the mill was located.
However, the contract clearly stated that 3C accepted no
responsibility whatsoever for any indirect of significant damage,such as lost profits, arising as a result of the contract.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
3/59
The cleaning system installed by 3C did not meet the requiredspecifications, but this condition was not determined until after 3Chad been paid RM 180 000 by HMF.
In fact, only seventy percent of the stated chemicals weresuccessfully eliminated from that factorys sewage.
As a result, HMF was fined RM 10 000 and was shut down by theenvironmental authority.
3C made several efforts to overcome the problem by altering theprocess and cleaning equipment, but without success.
HMF finally contracted with another equipment supplier.
With an additional cost of RM 250 000, the second suppliersuccessfully redesigned and installed treatment process equipmentthat cleaned the sewage to fulfill the environmental authoritiesstandards, in accordance with the original contract specifications
between 3C and HMF.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
4/59
Initially, relationship between 2 parties is created
more on mutual basis.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
5/59
Self-respect is the reason for individuals to keeptheir promises.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
6/59
During this period, most agreements are made betweenparties who are familiar and know his/her counterpart.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
7/59
1. Introduction
A contract intends to formalize anagreement between two or moreparties, in relation to a particularsubject.
Contracts can cover an extremelybroad range of matters:
a) The sale of goods or real property,
b) The terms of employment or of anindependent contractor relationship,
c) The settlement of a dispute, andownership of intellectual propertydeveloped as part of a work for hire.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
8/59
Contract Act 1950.
What is it exactly that you do
when you sign a 'contract' ?. The term 'contract' means a
promise or a set of promises
made by one person toanother, which the Courts willenforce.
A contract can contain anumber of promises or 'terms'to be performed by either
party.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
9/59
Blacks Law Dictionary defines a contractas [a]n agreement between two or more
parties creating obligations that areenforceable or otherwise recognizable at
law.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
10/59
You should be concerned about contractlaw because it determines how parties to
the contract will need to keep the promisesthey make.
Although very few contracts ever end up incourt, if the parties to a contract disagree
on something and are unable to resolvethe disagreement, they may have to resortto the judicial process.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
11/59
Self-directed reading
There is an old joke that "an oralcontract isn't worth the paper it's
written on".. Please note that, although
sometimes an oral contract is
referred to as a "verbalcontract", the term "oral" means"spoken" while the term "verbal"
can also mean" in words". Under that definition, all
contracts are technically
"verbal".
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
12/59
Agreement
Agreement
The manifestation by
two or more personsof the substance of acontract
Parties
Offeror
Person who makes anoffer
Offeree
Person to whom anoffer has been made
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
13/59
The Objective of Contracts
A theory that says the intent to contract is judged by thereasonable person standard and not by the subjective intent ofthe parties.
As soon as complex trading and commercial transactions start totake place in a society, it is necessary to have some mechanismto make these transactions work.
In any long-term commercial relationship, contract attempts to fix
the future. Contract also serves to concentrate the minds of the parties in
deciding a number of important things:1. such as who bears a particular risk,
2. who should insure against that risk,3. who should perform some tasks and4. who should do other tasks,5. when the tasks should be done,6. when they should be paid for, and so on. Negotiating a contract very much focuses attention on the future.
2 The Elements of a
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
14/59
2. The Elements of aContract
a) Offer.
b) Acceptance.
c) Legal Intent.
d) Consideration
e) Capacity.
f) Legal Object.
g) Genuine Consent.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
15/59
a) Offer
An offer is the promise made by one
party to another.
an offer must be made in clear and
definite terms. An offer is not made forever. Offers can
either be finalized, when all mutualpromises are fulfilled.
Or they can expire, if not timely accepted.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
16/59
2 types of offer:
i) General offer open to all/ public.
ii) Specific offer
specificindividual/party.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
17/59
An offer (and contract) must contain thefollowing terms Identification of the parties Identification of the subject matter and
quantity
Consideration to be paid
Time of performance
The communication of a proposal iscomplete when it comes to the knowledgeof a person to whom it is made.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
18/59
For an offer to be effective:
The offeror must objectivelyintend to be bound by theoffer.
The terms of the offer mustbe definite or reasonablycertain.
The offer must becommunicated to the
offeree.
2 The Elements of a
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
19/59
2. The Elements of aContract
a) Offer.
b) Acceptance.
c) Legal Intent.
d) Consideration
e) Capacity.
f) Legal Object.
g) Genuine Consent.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
20/59
The contract involves an offer (or morethan one offer) to another party, who
accepts the offer.
For example, in a contract for the sale of a
computer, the seller may offer thecomputer to the buyer for RM1,000.00.
The buyer's acceptance of that offer is anecessary part of creating a bindingcontract for the sale of the computer.
CASE / PROBLEM TO
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
21/59
CASE / PROBLEM TOSOLVE:
Syarikat Kejuruteraan Mekanikal Virgo, a machineryproducer has agreed to sell a processing machine toAries Corporation Berhad.
The design of this machine was produced by AriesCorporation. Aries Corporation Berhad has also given a guideline that
the processing machine would have a production
capacity of not less than 30 units per hour. Syarikat Kejuruteraan Mekanikal Virgo delivered the
machine to Aries Corporation but the specification wasnot fulfilled.
The design was followed exactly but the capacity couldonly reach a capacity of 28 units per hour.
According to Syarikat Kejuruteraan Mekanikal Virgo, if
the required design is produced then the productioncapacity may be affected, vice versa. Give guidance to Aries Corporation Berhad.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
22/59
b) Acceptance
When the person to whom the proposal is
made and he/she agree to the proposal,the proposal is said to have beenaccepted.
The person accepting the proposal thepromisee.
Acceptance of any promise is made inwords, the acceptance is said to beexpressed.
A t
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
23/59
Acceptance
The acceptance, like the offer, must begiven in clear terms.
It must be a positive act.
For instance, an offer cannot state "If I
don't hear from you, I will assume youhave accepted".
Doing nothing will never be consideredlegal acceptance.
M d f A t
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
24/59
Mode of Acceptance
An offeree must accept an offer by anauthorized means of communication
Express authorization
Acceptance must be by a specified means ofcommunication
Implied authorization
Mode of acceptance is implied from what is
customary in similar transactions, usage of trade,or prior dealings between the parties
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
25/59
c) Legal Intend
An agreement is not a contract in the strict
sense unless it is common intention of theparties that it shall be legally enforceable.
For a person to be bound to a contract, he
must seriously intend to create legalobligations.
However, there are cases where theagreements represent family arrangements.
In commercial arrangements, the presumption is
that legal relationships are intended.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
26/59
However, there are caseswhere the agreements
represent familyarrangements.
there is no intention to be sobound .
In commercial
arrangements, thepresumption is that legalrelationships are intended.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
27/59
d) Consideration
Consideration is defined as 'some right,benefit or profit accruing to the promisor.
the party trying to enforce the contract
must have 'paid' something in exchangefor the promise of the other party.
Consideration must be of real value, but itdoes not have to be money.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
28/59
In order to be valid,the parties to a
contract mustexchange
something of value. Something of legal
value must be given,
e.g., either a legalbenefit must bereceived or a legal loss
suffered.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
29/59
Contracts Lacking Consideration
Consideration (The mutual exchange of
something of value) In order to be valid, the parties to a
contract must exchange something ofvalue. In the case of the sale of acomputer, the buyer receives something of
value in the form of the computer, and theseller receives money.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
30/59
e) Capacity
Competent parties
Three questions must be first answered beforethe contract can be enforceable:
1) whether the corporation does in fact existand
2) whether it has the capacity to enter into the
contract and3) whether the person signing on behalf of thecorporation is, in fact, the authorized signatory.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
31/59
2. The Elements of a
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
32/59
Contract
a) Offer.
b) Acceptance.
c) Legal Intent.
d) Consideration
e) Capacity.
f) Legal Object.
g) Genuine Consent.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
33/59
There are two classes of natural persons whoare limited in their capacity to make a contract.They are:
1. Those not possessing mental capacity, and2.Those possessing mental capacity but lacking
legal capacity such as infants or minors.
Contracts provide that the agreement must beentered between competent parties,
All persons are presumable to be competent to
contract without restriction. The power of corporations and other creations of
government to contract are limited by its charter.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
34/59
Can an infant/ a baby enter into acontract?
2. The Elements of a
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
35/59
Contract
a) Offer.
b) Acceptance.
c) Legal Intent.
d) Consideration
e) Capacity.
f) Legal Object.
g) Genuine Consent.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
36/59
f) Legal Object
The object and purpose must be legal fora contract to be legal.
If its purpose is illegal because of statue ofcommon law, the contract may be void.
If the formation or the performance of a
contract is illegal, resulting in a crimeand/or tort, or opposing public policy orinterest, the contract is usually considered
void. For example, any contract that involves
purchasing a stolen item or an illegal drug,or involves fraud or harming someonewould be considered void.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
37/59
A legal subject matter: A court will notuphold a contract requiring anyone to
do something illegal.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
38/59
g) Genuine Consent. The parties to the contract
have a mutual understandingof what the contract covers.
When two parties have a"meeting of the minds," an
agreement can said to havebeen made.
Both parties must
understand the agreement,making sure nomisunderstanding ormistakes exists betweenthem.
Case Study:
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
39/59
Case Study:
Miss Cancer, an expert in electronic documentation system agreedto transfer Mr. Geminis works from a manual work to an electronicand computerized form.
A contract was signed. Payment for that task amounting RM 20 000
will only be made based on the work performance of Miss Cancer. Last week Miss Cancer completed Mr. Geminis electronic
documents contained some very important items including thedesign and specification of a new processing machine invented byMr. Gemini.
Miss Cancer delivered the electronic document to Mr. Geminiyesterday, a month earlier than the expected completion date.
Mr. Gemini was so grateful that he promised to pay Miss Cancer anextra of RM 7 000 today for her excellent work.
Mr. Gemini changes his mind today that he decides not to pay anyextra money to Miss Cancer.
Can Mr. Gemini claim that there was no consideration for thepromise as Miss Cancer had already completed the electronicdocument before the promise on RM 7 000 was made?
Give reasons or justifications for your answer.
Void, voidable andf bl t t
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
40/59
unenforceable contracts:
In general, there are threeclassifications of contracts thatare not binding:
1. Void If a contract is held to be void, the
contract has never come intoexistence.
It is not enforceable by law. For example, a contract is voidif
it is based on an illegal purpose
or contrary to public policy. The classic example is a contractwith a bankcrupt company. Sucha contract will not be recognized
by a court, and cannot beenforced by either party.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
41/59
2. Voidable
A contract is voidableif one of the parties
has the option to terminate the contract.
At first the contract is valid, then it can be
cancelled. The other parties are not be able to
complete the contract.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
42/59
Caused by one of the following:
1.Coercion threats
2.Undue influence domination, pressure
3.Fraud untrue, false
4.Misrepresentation - parody
5.Mistake error, inaccuracy
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
43/59
3. Unenforceable
If a contract is unenforceable, neither party may
enforce the other's obligations. This kind of contract cannot be performed.
For example, in the Malaysia, a contract isunenforceable if it violates any laws.
E.g: changes in government policy which do not
allow such contract to be performed. Forceable the contract can be continued.
Unenforceable the contract
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
44/59
cannot be continuedBecause:1.Natural disaster earthquake, heavy
flood, land slide etc
2. Accidents road accidents, fire etc.
3. Death
o
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
45/59
Discharge of contract can be based on:
a) Frustrationb) Performance
c) Breach
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
46/59
a) Frustration
A contract is frustrated when there is achange in the circumstances whichrenders a contract legally.
Physically impossible of performanceby one reason of some event which thepromisor could not prevent.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
47/59
b) Performance
Performance of a contract must beexact and precise and should be inaccordance with what the parties had
promised. Completion of all terms agreed in a
contract.
Satisfying all contracting parties.
D
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
48/59
c) Breach
One of the contracting party intend not to go
on with the contract. Refusal to perform a contract which occur
before the time for performance is due.
A party may end to the contract if the otherparty has disabled him/herself from
performing during the contract duration.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
49/59
The innocent party must restorebenefits which he/she may be receivedfrom the other party.
6. Breach of Contract
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
50/59
When a party fails to perform the statedobligation in a contract, the party is said to
be in breach of contract. The injured party has several resources.
The injured party may withdraw thecontract or release the other party from theobligations stated in the contract.
Also, the parties may agree on novation. Any of these three resolutions may be
enacted without litigation.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
51/59
The injured party may sue the other party formoney damages or for specific performance.
When someone sues for lost profits or for courtcosts, for example, it is said that a party hassued for money damages.
Specific performance may be ordered if the partybelieves money damages are an unfair form ofcompensation.
When someone seeks the remedy of specificperformance, the party is asking the court for theequitable remedy of compelling performance of
the contract.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
52/59
An alternate action for theinjured party is to sue for
injunctive relief, whichprohibits the other party fromperforming some specific act.
In other words, the injured partymay prevent the other partyfrom performing any relatedtransactions until the agreementis settled.
Types and Measures of Contract Damages:Case Study:
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
53/59
FACTS: Barbara agrees to pay Sam $20,000 if he will renovate
her office.
She gives him a deposit of $10,000 and, in reliance ontheir contract, pays an architect $5,000 for plans andpermits.
Before he begins work, Sam denies the contract. Barbara discovers that no one will accept less than
$22,000 to do what Sam had promised to do.
She has to give up her renovation plans as beyond herbudget.
She might elect to sue under any one of the three
following theories of recovery:
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
54/59
Twelve rules toconsider when entering into a contract.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
55/59
g
1. Remember the first rule of contracts whoever wrote the contract took care
of himself.
2. Read and understand any contract
before signing it.3. Know that complying with contract
terms is required before you haveperformed under the contract.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
56/59
4. Never assume your failure to perform acontract will be excused.
5. Know the other partys financialsituation and performance history.
6. Weigh the advantages of the contractin terms of higher prices against any
increased costs or risks.7. Remember proposed contracts are
always subject to negotiations.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
57/59
8. Make sure any changes to the contractare made in writing.
9. Do not rely on oral communicationsmade by the buyer, either before the
contract is signed or during thecontract performance.
10. Keep good records of yourperformance.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
58/59
11. Do not hesitate to ask questionswhen you do not understand what is
happening.
12. Stay in touch with the other party to
the contract.
8/8/2019 1_2009 EUP 222 - Contract Law (HO)
59/59
59
END OFTOPIC
THREE