Post on 20-Jan-2016
1
Physics @ CLIC
Albert De Roeck CERNand University of Antwerp and the IPPP Durham
2
Linear e+e- Colliders
Since end of 2001 there seems to be a worldwide consensus (ECFA/HEPAP/Snowmass 2001…)
The machine which will complement and extend the LHCbest, and is closest to be realized is a Linear e+e- Colliderwith a collision energy of at least 500 GeV
PROJECTS: TeV Colliders (cms energy up to 1 TeV) Technology ~ready August’04 ITRP: NLC/GLC/TESLA ILC superconducting cavities Multi-TeV Collider (cms energies in multi-TeV range) R&D CLIC (CERN + collaborators) Two Beam Acceleration
3
A LC is a Precision Instrument• Clean e+e- (polarized intial state, controllable s for
hard scattering)• Detailed study of the properties of Higgs particles mass to 0.03%, couplings to 1-3%, spin & CP structure,
total width (6%) factor 2-5 better than LHC/measure couplings in model indep. way
• Precision measurements of SUSY particles properties, i.e. slepton masses to better than 1%, if within reach
• Precision measurements a la LEP (TGC’s, Top and W mass)
• Large indirect sensitivity to new phenomena (eg WLWL scattering)
LC will very likely play important role to disentangle the underlying new theory
4
LC: Few More Examples Understanding SUSY High accuracy of sparticle mass measurements relevant for reconstruction of SUSY
breaking mechanism Dark Matter LC will accurately measure m and couplings, i.e. Higgsino/Wino/Bino content Essential input to cosmology & searches LC will make a prediction of DMh²~ 3%
(SPS1a) A mismatch with WMAP/Planck would reveal extra sources of DM (Axions, heavy objects) Quantum level consistency: MH(direct)=
MH(indirect)?
sin2W~10-5 (GigaZ), MW ~ 6 MeV(?) (+theory progress) MH (indirect) ~ 5%
1/M GeV-1
G. Blair et al
‘WMAP’ 7 %
LHC ~15 %
‘Planck’
~2 %
LC ~3 %F. Richard/SPS1a
Gaugino mass parameters
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
CTF2: CLIC Test Facility 2
Demonstrated that 2 beam acceleration worksReached up to 190 MV/m for short pulses (16ns)
12
13
14
15
16
Building CLIC at CERN?
It is possible!
Geological analyses show that there is a contineous stretch of 40 km parallel to the Jura and the lake,with good geologicalconditions.
Reminder
17
Cross Sections at CLIC
18
Experimental Issues: Backgrounds CLIC 3 TeV e+e- collider with a luminosity ~ 1035cm-2s-1 (1 ab-1/year)
To reach this high luminosity: CLIChas to operate in a regime of high beamstrahlung
Expect large backgrounds# of photons/beam particle e+e- pair production events Muon backgrounds Neutrons Synchrotron radiationExpect distorted lumi spectrumReport
Old Values
19
Experimental issues: Luminosity Spectrum
Luminosity spectrum not assharply peaked as e.g. at LEPor TESLA/NLC
20
e+e- Pair Production
Coherent pair production number/BX 4.6 109
energy/BX 3.9 108 TeV
Can be suppressed by strong magneticfield in of the detector
Disappear in the beampipe
Incoherent pair production: number/BX 4.6 105
energy/BX 3.9 104 TeV
4T field
hits/mm2/bunch train
Can backscatter on machine elementsNeed to protect detector with mask
30mm O(1) hit/mm2/bunch train
21
Background
Neutral and charged energy as function of cos per bx
Particles acceptedwithin > 120mrad
hadrons: 4 interactions/bx with WHAD>5 GeV
For studies: take 20 bx and overlay events
22
Muon BackgroundMuon pairs produced in electromagnetic interactionsupstream of the IP e.g beam halo scraping on the collimators
GEANT3 simulation, taking intoaccount the full CLIC beam delivery system
# of muons expected in the detector ~ few thousand/bunchtrain (150-300 bunches/100-150ns)
OK for (silicon like) tracker Calorimeter?
1 shower >100 GeV/5 bx
~20 muons per bx
23
Studies include background, spectra,…
Detector simulation (2004) SIMDET (fast simulation) GEANT3 based programStudies of the benchmark processes include backgrounds,effects of lumi spectrum etc.
Physics generators (COMPHEPPYTHIA6,… )+ CLIC lumi spectrum (CALYPSO)
+ hadrons backgrounde.g. overlay 20 bunch crossings(+ e+e- pair background files…)
24
Detector:Active (small) group at CERN now: backgrounds, calorimetry,Time stamping, forward region… Weekly meetings…
25
Example B-tagging
B-Decay length is long!
Define Area of Interest by 0.04 rad cone around the jet axis Count hit multiplicity (or pulse height) in Vertex Track layers Tag heavy hadron decay by step in detected multiplicity Can reach 50% eff./~80% purity
26
Calorimetry
Importance of good energy resolution (e.g via energy flow)Interesting developments in TeV-class LC working groupse.g. compact 3D EM calorimeters, or “digital” hadronic calorimeters Detailed simulation studies of key processes requiredR&D accordingly afterwards/Join ILC detector efforts
27
General Physics Context
• New physics expected in TeV energy range– Higgs, supersymmetry, extra dimensions, …?
• LHC will indicate what physics, and at which energy scale
• Two scenarios:– New physics at a low energy scale
• But perhaps more particles/phenomena at higher energies (e.g., supersymmetry)
– New physics threshold at higher energy scale• In many scenarios, e.g., SUSY, LHC will soon tell us the threshold
28
Example: Resonance ProductionResonance scans, e.g. a Z’
Degenerate resonancese.g. D-BESS model
1 ab-1 M/M ~ 10-4 & / = 3.10-3
Can measure M down to 13 GeV
Smeared lumi spectrum allowsstill for precision measurements
29
Physics Case: A light Higgs
Large cross sections Large CLIC luminosity Large events statistics Keep large statistics also for highest Higgs masses
O(500 K) Higgses/yearAllows to study the decaymodes with BRs ~ 10-4 suchas H and Hbb (>180 GeV) Eg: determine gH to ~4%
Low mass Higgs:400 000 Higgses/
30
Physics case: Higgs potential
Reconstruct shape of the Higgs potential to complete the study of the Higgs profile and to obtain a direct proof of the EW symmetry breaking mechanism
Measure the triple (quartic) couplings
process
31
Physics case: the Higgs Potential
Reconstruct shape of the Higgs potential to complete the study of the Higgs profile and to obtain a direct proof of the EW symmetry breaking mechanism
Can measure the Higgs potential for Higgs even for masses up to 300 GeVwith precision up to 5-10% (using polarization/weighting)
32
Physics case: Heavy Higgs (MSSM)LHC: Plot for 5 discovery
3 TeV CLIC H, A detectable up to ~ 1.2 TeV
33
Physics case: SUSY measurements
Benchmark Scenarios: CMSSMAllowed by present data constraintsADR,F., Gianotti,JE,F. Moortgat, K. Olive, L. Papehep-ph/0508198
LC/LHC complementarityPrecision measurements at ILC/CLICEg. 1150 GeV smuon mass to O(1%)Will a 0.5-1 TeV collider be enough?
34
Susy Mass Measurements
Momentum resolutionpt/pt
2 ~ 10-4 GeV-1
adequate for thismeasurement
Mass measurementsto O(1%)
Momentum resolution (G3)
37
Physics Case: Extra Dimensions
Universal extra dimensions: Measure all (pair produced) newparticles and see the higher level excitations
RS KK resonances…Scan the different states
38
Precision Measurements
E.g.: Contact interactions:Sensitivity to scales up to 100-400 TeV
39
Indicative Physics Reach
Approximate mass reach machines: s = 14 TeV, L=1034 (LHC) : up to 6.5 TeV s = 14 TeV, L=1035 (SLHC) : up to 8 TeV s = 28 TeV, L=1034 : up to 10 TeV
Units are TeV (except WLWL reach) Ldt correspond to 1 year of running at nominal luminosity for 1 experiment
† indirect reach (from precision measurements)
PROCESS LHC SLHC DLHC VLHC VLHC ILC CLIC 14 TeV 14 TeV 28 TeV 40 TeV 200 TeV 0.8 TeV 5 TeV 100 fb-1 1000 fb-1 100 fb-1 100 fb-1 100 fb-1 500 fb-1 1000 fb-1
Squarks 2.5 3 4 5 20 0.4 2.5 WLWL 2 4 4.5 7 18 6 90Z’ 5 6 8 11 35 8† 30† Extra-dim (=2) 9 12 15 25 65 5-8.5† 30-55†
q* 6.5 7.5 9.5 13 75 0.8 5compositeness 30 40 40 50 100 100 400TGC () 0.0014 0.0006 0.0008 0.0003 0.0004 0.00008
Ellis, Gianotti, ADRhep-ex/0112004+ few updates
Extend this table
40
Summary: Physics at CLIC
Experimental conditions at CLIC are more challenging than at LEP, or ILC
Physics studies for CLIC have included the effects of the detector, and backgrounds e.g e+e- pairs and events.
Benchmark studies show that CLIC will allow for precision measurements in the TeV range
CLIC has a very large physics potential, reach beyond that of the LHC.
Ongoing now: Detector studies and R&D -Tracking with good time stamping, - - - improved calorimetry, pflow, mask area,…
41
Summary: Scenarios with early LHC data…
• New physics shows up at the LHC CLIC will – Complete the particle spectra, with a very high reach– Measure accurately parameters of the model (LC quality)
• Only a light Higgs at the LHC CLIC will – Measure its properties very accurately, like ILC and more..
– Extend the LHC direct search reach for non-colored particles
– Extend the indirect search reach to a scale of 500 (1000?) TeV via precision measurements
• No signs of new physics or a Higgs at the LHC CLIC can – Study WW scattering in the 1-2 TeV range in detail– Extend the LHC direct search reach for non-colored particles
– Extend the indirect search reach to a scale of 500 (1000?) TeV via precision measurements
42
Backup