Post on 17-Mar-2020
Page 1
Submarine landslide deposits as a key to understanding tsunami generation by volcano lateral 1
collapse: The historical collapse of Ritter Island, Papua New Guinea 2
3
Simon Day1, Pilar Llanes2,3*, Eli Silver2, Gary Hoffmann4, Steve Ward2, and Neal Driscoll5 4
5
1Dept. of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK 6
2Earth and Planetary Sciences Dept., University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, United 7
States 8
3Dept. Geodinámica, Geológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain 9
4CFD Lab, Mech. Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, United States 10
5Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States 11
*Corresponding author 12
13
ABSTRACT 14
15
The March 13th 1888 collapse of Ritter Island in Papua New Guinea is the largest known sector 16
collapse of an island volcano in historical times. One single event removed most of the island and 17
its western submarine flank, and produced a landslide deposit that extends at least 70 km from the 18
headwall of the collapse scar. We have mapped and described the deposits of the debris avalanche 19
left by the collapse using full-coverage bathymetry, side-scan sonar images, seismic-reflection 20
profiles, TowCam photographs of the sea bottom and scarce samples from a dredge. Applying 21
concepts originally developed on the 1980 Mount St. Helens collapse landslide deposits, we find 22
that the Ritter landslide deposits shows three distinct morphological facies: large block, matrix-23
Page 2
rich and debris flow distal facies. Restoring the island’s land and submarine topography we 24
obtained a volume of 4.2 km3 for the initial collapse, about 75% of which is now forming the 25
large block facies at distances less than 12 km from the collapse scar. The matrix-rich facies 26
volume is unknown, but large scale erosion of the marine sediment substrate yielded a minimum 27
total volume of 6.4 km3 in the distal debris flow and/or turbidites deposits, highlighting the 28
efficiency of substrate erosion during the later history of the landslide movement. Our analysis 29
shows that well-exposed submarine landslide deposits can be interpreted in a similar way to 30
subaerial volcano collapse deposits, and that they can be useful to interpretate older, incompletely 31
exposed landslide deposits. Studying the deposits from a facies perspective provides the basis for 32
understanding the mechanisms involved in the movement and emplacement of deposits from a 33
collapse event, and for reconstruction of its kinematics, both of which are crucial for improving 34
tsunami modeling. 35
36
1. Volcano lateral collapse and tsunamis: the study of submarine landslide deposits 37
38
Lateral collapses are a near-ubiquitous feature of volcanoes in most island volcanic arcs. 39
Numerous collapse generated landslide deposits with volumes of cubic kilometers to tens of cubic 40
kilometers occur both in volcanic island arcs such as the Lesser Antilles (Deplus et al., 2001; Le 41
Friant et al. 2003) and Kermadec arcs (Wright et al., 2006), and in back arc settings such as the 42
Sea of Japan (Satake & Kato 2001). Island or coastal volcano lateral collapses with volumes of a 43
few cubic kilometers and maximum thicknesses of 500 meters or more occur at a global 44
frequency of the order of ~ 1 per 100 years (REFERENCES?). Smaller landslides removing 45
Page 3
summit dome complexes or thin layers from the volcano flanks occur at intervals of years to 46
decades (e.g., 2002 Stromboli; Bonaccorso et al., 2003). 47
Ritter Island 1888 is the largest ocean-entering volcano lateral collapse, in volcanic arc 48
settings, for which we have written accounts of both the collapses and the resulting tsunamis 49
(Table 1). It produced a large, regionally destructive tsunami that was witnessed by literate 50
observers who timed the waves with watches and provided the most detailed accounts of any 51
tsunami produced by a km-volume lateral collapse into the ocean (summarized in Cooke, 1981). 52
That data has been key to modeling the generation of the tsunami by the landslide and its later 53
propagation (Ward & Day 2003). Understanding how submarine landslides from volcano 54
collapses generate these tsunamis is a key motivator for studying their kinematics and ultimately 55
their mechanics. There is a need for detailed studies of young, well exposed landslide deposits on 56
the ocean floor that are associated with known tsunamis in order to provide a basis for the 57
interpretation and modeling of older, incompletely exposed landslide deposits from other island 58
arc volcanoes. 59
In this paper we describe the submarine landslide deposit from the historical collapse of 60
Ritter Island in Papua New Guinea (Figure 1, Figure 2). We show that whilst the collapse was a 61
single event, the deposit is subdivided into distinct facies as a result of rheological 62
transformations during movement; and that the geometry of the deposit and associated erosional 63
features can be used to reconstruct the kinematics of landslide movement. We need detailed 64
studies of young, well exposed volcano collapse landslide deposits on the ocean floor in order to 65
provide a basis for the interpretation of older, incompletely exposed landslide deposits. Historical 66
descriptions, sketches and measurements of pre-collapse Ritter Island define its geometry above 67
sea level in more detail than for any other volcano lateral collapse, and these descriptions also 68
Page 4
constrain the sequence of events (Johnson et al.,1972). These data have provided us with a unique 69
opportunity to analyze the landslide facies of a submarine volcano collapse event. 70
71
2. Background 72
73
2.1 Field observations from Ritter Island 74
75
Descriptions by Johnson et al. (1972) and our onshore field observations in 2006 reveals that the 76
subaerial exposed part of Ritter is a volcanic sequence dominated by rubbly or spatter-fed lavas 77
with some massive flow cores, and intercalations of finer-grained scoria. Steeply east dipping 78
sequences form the whole of the volcanic stratigraphy, from the rim of the collapse scar to the 79
oldest subaerial lavas, exposed adjacent to hyaloclastite tuffs with thin scoria beds that are the 80
structurally lowest and oldest unit of the remaining subaerial part of the edifice. These rocks are 81
cut by numerous irregular, broadly N-S striking dikes and outward dipping sheet intrusions up to 82
several meters thick, and some NW striking dikes. Fumarolic alteration is present in the lower 83
part of the exposed sequence. The island is incised by channels or gullies up to several tens of 84
meters wide, with steep to vertical walls up to a few tens of meters high. Similar gullies filled by 85
lava flows and discrete boulder brecciate units form minor unconformities within the pre-collapse 86
volcanic sequence. However, there are no marked unconformities extending along the face of the 87
collapse scar that would record past collapse events, nor are there flat lying, ponded lava flows 88
that would indicate a collapse scar buried within the intact remnant of the island, as seen 89
elsewhere (Day et al. 1999; Carracedo et al., 1999; Carracedo et al., 2002). There is, therefore, no 90
evidence from the island for recent pre-1888 lateral collapses of Ritter, comparable to that which 91
Page 5
occurred in 1888. On the other hand, the pre-1888 sketches of the island (Figure 2) show evidence 92
for smaller landslide scars that would have been produced in events that removed rock volumes of 93
less than 0.1 km3. Comparison with data for similar events such as the 2002 Stromboli landslide 94
(Table 1B) suggests that deposits from such landslides would not have gone more than a few 95
kilometers from Ritter and would therefore be either buried under the 1888 deposits or would 96
have been eroded and entrained into the 1888 debris avalanche. 97
98
2.2. Historical observations from Ritter Island 99
100
Cooke (1981) summarized the observations of activity at Ritter Island from William 101
Dampier’s sighting of an eruption in 1700 through to the German colonization of northern New 102
Guinea that started in the 1880s. These accounts indicate that Ritter experienced intermittent 103
eruptive activity in the years just before the collapse, but numerous accounts of fumaroles indicate 104
hydrothermal activity. Later collection of reports from communities on Umboi Island indicated 105
that the collapse of the volcano around 6 am on March 13th 1888 was preceded by explosions 106
accompanied by earthquakes, but there was no mention of eruptions of magma (Fisher, 1939; 107
1957). There is no evidence for a large magmatic eruption associated with the collapse, although 108
it seems likely that at least hydrothermal or phreatic explosions took place. Thus, the collapse is 109
most likely to have been associated with phreatic but not magmatic explosive activity. This 110
activity is of the Bandai type, following the classification of Siebert et al (1987). 111
The collapse produced tsunami waves that were recorded at observation points between 112
100 and 600 km from the volcano between about 6:30 am and 8:30 am local time on March 13th, 113
and continued for 40-150 minutes with dominant wave periods around 3 minutes. No observer 114
Page 6
described more than one series of tsunami waves. Ward & Day (2003) showed that the times of 115
arrival and durations of the tsunami at these different sites are consistent with the propagation and 116
progressive frequency dispersion of ~3 minute period tsunami waves produced by a single 117
landslide from Ritter Island. No further tsunamis were recorded at the various observation points 118
in the days, weeks and months immediately after the event. The historic evidence is consistent 119
with only one major collapse or landslide event occurring in 1888. 120
Earthquakes and submarine explosive activity immediately west of Ritter Island in 1972 121
and 1974 marked the growth of a new submarine volcanic vent within the collapse scar (Cooke et 122
al. 1976; Cooke, 1981). Two small tsunamis occurred in these years, the only ones to be recorded 123
from Ritter between 1888 and the time of our survey in 2004. Any young, large volume landslide 124
deposits in the area north west of Ritter Island are most likely associated with the single 1888 125
collapse. 126
Despite the lack of large volume tephra falls associated with the events of 1888, it was 127
supposed for many years that an explosive eruption and caldera collapse had occurred at Ritter 128
Island in 1888 (Fisher, 1957; Cooke, 1981). Following the 1980 May 18th Mount St. Helens 129
lateral collapse, the Ritter event was investigated by Johnson (1987) with a single-beam 130
echosounder survey of the immediate area of the island that revealed a broadly west facing open 131
horseshoe shaped collapse scar and large bathymetric highs interpreted by Johnson as landslide 132
blocks, allowing him to estimate a volume for the collapse scar of 4- 5 km3. The later survey did 133
not extend far beyond the collapse scar and so the full run-out distance, extent and structure of the 134
deposits associated with the collapse has been an important gap in knowledge of the 1888 Ritter 135
Island event. 136
137
Page 7
2.3. Restoration of pre-collapse island topography 138
139
Observers of Ritter in 1700 described the island as a steep, gullied cone with a height 140
about half of the adjacent extinct volcano of Sakar Island rising at 998 m (Dampier, 1729). 141
Accounts in the 19th Century emphasized the extremely steep-sided nature of the subaerial part of 142
Ritter volcano with measurements of about 780 m height and 1.83 km E-W width (Dumont 143
d’Urville, 1832), implying slopes significantly in excess of 45°. To estimate the island’s 144
dimensions we compared the sketch and description of the island, made in early 1835 by Jacobs 145
(1844), with the modern island. Matching the present island’s features to gullies in Jacobs’ sketch 146
(Figure 2). Scaling the sketch to the modern island with a maximum height 140 m yields a pre-147
collapse height of around 750 m and an E-W width of around 1.5 km. These pre-collapse 148
dimensions are consistent with the ~45° slope of the surviving eastern flank of the island. Because 149
the island is still about 1.9 km long it must have been elongated N-S. Another sketch of the island 150
made on the same voyage in 1835 by Woodworth (Figure 2) confirms the overall steep slopes of 151
the island. Both sketches suggest that the western side of the island (to the left in both cases) was 152
steeper and perhaps had already experiencing landslides. Our bathymetric data, discussed below, 153
indicates that the submarine slopes of the volcano down to 700 m below sea level are mainly 154
symmetrical and an upward extrapolation of these slopes to sea level implies that the pre-collapse 155
island had a N-S length of a little over 2 km. We use this restoration of the pre-landslide 156
topography together with an extrapolation of the submarine collapse scar in a later section to 157
approximate the volume of the sector of the island collapsed during the 1888 event. 158
159
3. Methods 160
Page 8
161
During November-December of 2004 we conducted a geophysical research cruise along 162
the Bismarck volcanic arc aboard the R/V Kilo Moana. We acquired swath bathymetry data with 163
a Simrad EM-120 hull-mounted echo sounder, operating at 12 kHz (±0.75 kHz). The beams are 164
transmitted across a total swath opening of up to 150°, depending on depth. Acoustic backscatter 165
intensity images were obtained with the HAWAII MR1 Sonar, a portable shallow-towed system 166
with swath width up to 7.5 times the water depth. The MR1 sonar transducers are housed in a 4.8 167
m long, 1600 kg vehicle that is towed beneath the surface mixed layer (80 to 120 m) and requires 168
a minimum water depth of 500 m, limiting our work at shallower depths. The Hawaiian Mapping 169
Research Group processed both the bathymetry data and the acoustic images on board using 170
Simrad’s software. We used a median filter and gridded the bathymetry and the acoustic data to 171
24 and 16 m, respectively. High-resolution Compressed High Intensity “Radar” Pulse (CHIRP) 172
sub-bottom sonar data were collected with an X-Star towed 1-5.5 kHz instrument (Scripps 173
Institution of Oceanography). CHIRP data were acquired by transmitting approximately every 5-174
10 m along selected transects with penetration up to several tens of meters. CHIRP data are 175
unmigrated. 176
Digital photographs of the seafloor were taken using the digital “TowCam” system 177
(Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution) along four transects, over the Ritter deposits, each of the 178
tows lasting approximately 4 h from deployment to recovery (see Figure 3 for locations). The 179
camera is towed 100-300 meters behind the ship at speeds of ¼ to ½ knot, at an elevation of 5 180
meters above the seafloor. The TowCam records depth, altitude, water temperature, water clarity 181
or turbidity and it was set to record overlapping seabed photos every 10 s. It allowed us to 182
document the location and distribution of a variety of different lithologies and structures exposed 183
Page 9
on the seabed, and distribution of megafauna (animals visible in camera were typically >1 cm). 184
Correlation of the camera images with the bathymetric, acoustic backscatter and CHIRP data (all 185
of which were used to plan the TowCam lines), has provided ground truth and therefore allowed 186
better interpretation of the various types of acoustic data. 187
188
4. The submarine collapse scar and the post-collapse volcanic edifice 189
190
The collapse scar has a 2 km long headwall in a N-S direction and extends to the western 191
foot of the volcano at 900 m depth, where it is up to 4 km wide with the sidewalls defining a 192
sector arc of about 60 degrees (Figure 4). The north and south walls of the collapse scar are steep, 193
rising 100 to 200 m above the level of the post-collapse fill, and with very high backscatter 194
intensity suggesting extensive exposure of bedrock on the cliff faces (Figure 5). The spoon shaped 195
geometry of this surface may suggest that the landslide began as a single rotational block failure. 196
The single continuous tsunami reported by the eyewitnesses indicates that the largest part of the 197
collapse scar was generated in a single event; but the failure may have consisted of a number of 198
blocks moving in rapid succession upon a single failure surface, as seen directly in the 1980 199
lateral collapse of Mount St. Helens (Voight, 1981; Voight et al., 1983), and thereafter moved as a 200
single unit. No lateral boundaries between separate lobes of similar facies deposits are seen in the 201
Ritter Island deposits. If multiple collapse events had occurred, deposits from the earlier collapse 202
events would be expected to show a partial cover from deposits associated with the later events 203
(Yokose & Lipman, 2004). We see no evidence to indicate that the collapse scar was produced by 204
multiple failure events. 205
Page 10
The collapse scar has been partly filled by a post collapse volcano with a summit crater a 206
few hundred meters across and a rim at about 300 m depth. This and other volcanic vents on the 207
surface of the landslide deposit are distinguishable from collapse blocks because they have 208
conical shapes and low backscatter intensity (V in Figure 5). The summit vent of the large edifice 209
within the collapse scar is located at the sites of eruption plumes that broke the surface of the sea 210
during the 1972 and 1974 explosive volcanic eruptions (Cooke et al., 1976) dredged by the later 211
authors and found to be XXXX. Eruptive activity inside the scar left by a lateral collapse is 212
common because ascending magmas take advantage of the weakened areas created by collapse 213
structures, erupting within it (e.g. the Lesser Antilles, Boudon et al., 2007). The flanks of the main 214
post-collapse volcano are smooth, lacking discrete flank vents, and have uniform moderate 215
backscatter intensity. The smooth lobes of low backscatter intensity extending from the base of 216
the post collapse edifice to the NW and SW may also be features of post collapse eruptions, such 217
as deposits from syneruptive volcaniclastic density currents. 218
219
5. Submarine landslide facies 220
221
Glicken (1991; 1996) subdivided the morphological and sedimentological characteristics 222
of the deposits from a volcano collapse into distinct facies. Landslide facies for the Mount St. 223
Helens deposit were described in great detail, including block size distribution, abundances of 224
discrete blocks in contrast with matrix material, deposit thickness variations and depositional 225
slopes. To gain a more complete understanding of emplacement, we compared Glicken’s 226
landslide facies concepts to our submarine observations. The use of full-coverage bathymetry, 227
backscatter images, and TowCam photographs of the sea bottom, samples from cores and dredges 228
Page 11
and high-resolution seismic data, has allowed us to define and map the submarine landslide facies 229
of the 1888 Ritter Island collapse. We have divided the deposit into three facies: large block 230
avalanche facies, matrix-rich debris avalanche facies, and distal debris flow facies. Such a 231
approach will yield new insights into how submarine avalanche deposits evolve downslope away 232
from their source. 233
234
5.1. Large block debris avalanche facies 235
236
5.1.1. Depositional features 237
238
The large block facies extends 12 km from the headwall of the collapse scar, filling the 239
full width of the valley between Sakar and Umboi islands as far as a constriction in the valley 240
formed by two overlapping ridges trending NE-SW across the valley sides (R1 and R2, Figure 4). 241
The margins and top surface of the large block facies deposit are at a depth of about 900 m on its 242
eastern and northern sides, but descend towards the gap between the ridges, where the top of the 243
deposit is at 1240 m depth at its furthest downslope limit. The average slope along the length of 244
this facies is about 2.1°. This area has large discrete irregular blocks or hummocks up to more 245
than 1 km across and over 100 m high, with generally high backscatter intensity (B in Figure 5). 246
The distribution was determined by contrasting acoustic responses of the lava blocks and the fine 247
products surrounding them, as well as the angular shapes of the blocks, which provide surfaces 248
facing the beam geometry. The largest of the blocks (B in Figure 6) is located in the mouth of the 249
collapse scar and was first identified by Johnson (1987). Its asymmetry is consistent with it being 250
a displaced and back-rotated segment of the flank of the volcano. The majority of the other large 251
Page 12
blocks are concentrated toward the southern and western margins of the deposit. The high slopes 252
and irregular surfaces of the blocks produced strong seabed diffractions and the characteristic lack 253
of seismic penetration over blocks deposits. The absence of a sedimentary cover over these large 254
blocks in the seismic profiles (Figure 7) is consistent with the recent age of the landslide deposit. 255
The overall geometry of the large block facies deposit suggests that it was ponded in the 256
valley to the east of the constriction. This ponding is similar to that seen in the large block facies 257
of the Mount St. Helens landslide deposit (Glicken 1991, 1996) and others like Mount Shasta 258
(Crandall et al. 1984, Crandall 1988). 259
260
5.1.2. Erosional features 261
262
On the lower slope of Umboi Island there is a laterally extensive region of uniform high 263
backscatter intensity with a sharp upslope contact (“Scouring” in Figure 5) sub-parallel to the 900 264
and 800 bathymetric contours. This contact undulates, curving upslope and over a small ridge (R3 265
in Figure 4) and reaching its maximum elevation at a depth of 700 m, which is 200 m above the 266
level of the large block facies deposit (R1 in Figure 4). The contact is continuous across several 267
fans of high backscatter material trending down the slope from Umboi Island, but it is 268
discontinuous where larger fans are present. The high backscatter zone also extends over the crest 269
of the larger ridge (R1 in Figure 4) that bounds the large block facies deposit at the constriction 270
and down slope into the matrix rich facies deposit area. 271
272
5.2. Matrix rich debris avalanche facies 273
274
Page 13
The transition from block-rich to matrix-rich facies occurs where the gap between Umboi 275
and Sakar is constricted between two ridges (R1 and R2 on Figure 4). Similarly, the transition 276
from large block facies to matrix-rich facies in the 1980 Mount St. Helens debris avalanche 277
deposit occurs at a constriction in the North Fork Toutle River (Glicken 1991, 1996). In this 278
section we describe the nature of depositional and erosional features, the latter consisting of steep-279
sided mesas and grooved terrain. 280
281
5.2.1. Depositional features 282
283
The matrix rich facies is characterized by a distinctive speckled pattern in the backscatter 284
intensity map (Figure 8), and as a coarse blocky and non-stratified mass in high-resolution 285
seismic data (Shots 2800-3500 in Line 2/7, shots 700-1300 in Line 3/1 Figure 9) that corresponds 286
to irregular hummocky terrains, which is typical of submarine debris avalanche deposits (Moore 287
et al., 1989, 1994; Watts and Masson, 1995). We interpret high reflectivity patches to generally 288
indicate the presence of blocks. High reflectivity results from a high contrast in the sound velocity 289
times the density of the materials (impedance contrast). Volcanic blocks have high impedance 290
contrast relative to the sediment deposits surrounding them. The patches of high backscatter 291
intensity in the upper area of the rich matrix facies are 100-300 m across. 292
The acoustic character, a lack of CHIRP penetration, and discrete areas of diffractions 293
allowed us to map the lateral extent of the matrix rich facies, differentiating it from the sediments 294
of the lower slopes of Umboi and Sakar islands. Along the lower slope of the islands, well-295
layered reflectors are observed. Diffractions are present in areas of high slope. The thickness of 296
acoustically laminated sediments varies depending on slope and location relative to the islands. 297
Page 14
Line 3/1 in Figure 9 shows as much as 0.016 two way time seconds of sediments along the slope 298
of Umboi and 0.008 two way time seconds of sediments along the slope of Sakar. This acoustic 299
penetration is equivalent to 12 and 6 m using a nominal water velocity of 1500 m/s to convert for 300
thickness. 301
A series of lobes occurs at the downslope end of the matrix rich facies deposit. These 302
lobes are located in flat-floored channels between a series of steep-sided, flat-topped features 303
referred to here as mesas. TowCam images of these distal lobes with their characteristic mottled 304
backscatter intensity show that the lobes are partly covered in fine-grained, bioturbated (hence 305
soft and unconsolidated) marine sediment. Hummocks encountered along the TowCam lines 5 306
and 6 (Figure 3) through the lobes are a few tens of meters to several tens of meters across, and 307
several meters high, composed of poorly sorted, angular blocks mainly less than a meter across, 308
but ranging in size from centimeters to over five meters long (Figure 10a, b and c). No banding or 309
layering is observed in the blocks, nor are there any clear variations in block characteristics at any 310
one hummock or mound, suggesting that these are monolithologic, whereas different mounds 311
show different rock types. Polygonal-jointed columnar blocks from a thick jointed substrate are 312
exposed in one of the mounds of TowCam 5 (Figure 10b), whereas other mounds in the same 313
TowCam line showed pitted clasts that appear to be coarsely vesicular (Figure 10c). The clasts 314
form a habitat for abundant sessile filter-feeding organisms like white sponges, soft corals, 315
anemones and crinoids that require hard substrates for their attachments and are not observed in 316
sediment-draped areas, except for rare examples of anemones attached to sunken tree branches. 317
We interpret the mounds as debris avalanche hummocks or fragmented blocks composed of 318
volcanic rocks from the Ritter Island edifice. 319
320
Page 15
5.2.2. Erosional features 321
322
5.2.2.1. Submarine canyon 323
324
Along most of the length of the matrix rich facies deposits there is a 1 km wide and 20-40 325
m-deep submarine canyon. It starts at the valley constriction that limits the block and matrix 326
facies deposits and it is easily recognized out to the 1700 m isobath. The five CHIRP profiles 327
crossing the channel image a strong reflection with no penetration, indicating the lack of a 328
sedimentary sequence in the canyon (e.g., line 3/1 in Figure 9) and demonstrating that this canyon 329
is erosional. 330
331
5.2.2.2. Black Streak 332
333
Between the distal lobes of the debris avalanche deposit there is an elongated feature with 334
very high backscatter intensity that we named the “Black Streak” (BS in Figure 8). It is 1 km wide 335
and rises 20 m above the surrounding terrain. Images over its crest show that it is composed of 336
angular clasts that are dark and pitted, appearing vesicular or scoriaceous (Figure 10d). An 337
abundant and diverse fauna of sponges, soft corals and crinoids is present, similar to that seen on 338
the debris avalanche blocks. Unlike the poorly sorted clasts in the debris avalanche deposit, the 339
clasts in the “black streak” are uniform in size, 10 to 20 cm across. The CHIRP profile crossing it 340
shows its relief with strong echoes underlying transparent facies and overlying a debris avalanche 341
deposit that covers its eastern side (Line 24, Figure 11). 342
343
Page 16
5.2.2.3. Mesas 344
345
To either side of the lobes of the matrix-rich debris avalanche deposit there are several 346
flat-topped surface features rising above the surrounding seabed and with a mesa-like appearance 347
(M in Figure 8). These mesas are unique to this area, and similar features were not found 348
anywhere else in the length of the Bismarck arc covered by the research cruise. The best-defined 349
example (M* in Figure 8) has a near vertical scarp, 50 m-high, with a steep slope covered by 350
cohesive sediment blocks. Along its margins, except the NE one, there are marked troughs, 351
several m-deep and almost 100 m-wide, where exposed lithic clasts similar to the clasts seen in 352
the matrix-rich debris avalanche deposit were seen across it in TowCam 5. Two of those mesas 353
were also crossed by CHIRP profile 24 (Figure 11), revealing the presence of sedimentary 354
layering and differentiating them from the nearby avalanche deposits. 355
Along the SW margin of the matrix rich facies deposit, there are several mesas developed 356
on a marked slope above the debris avalanche deposit and without troughs developed around 357
them (M’ in Figure 8; Line 3/1 in Figure 9). 358
359
5.2.2.4. Grooved terrain 360
361
To the N and E of the matrix rich facies deposits and on the tops of the sediment mesas, 362
we observed a lineated or grooved terrain in the backscatter and TowCam images (mapped with 363
dotted areas in Figure 12). A correlation of sets of TowCam images and the camera altimeter 364
allowed us to estimate that the largest grooves imaged were several tens of meters across and 365
several meters deep and seem to be small-scale counterparts of larger linear structures (several 366
Page 17
thousand meters long) that produce the fabric seen in the backscatter data. The walls of the 367
grooves are steep, occasionally overhanging, and characteristically scalloped suggesting that the 368
grooves are cut into cohesive sediment with significant strength (Figure 10e, f). In rare cases, 369
planar sedimentary bedding is visible in groove walls. A sessile fauna dominated by near-370
transparent barrel-shaped sponges occurs on some groove walls but the diverse fauna of sponge, 371
soft coral and crinoids seen on the debris avalanche deposit blocks is not present. There are 372
sparse, scattered lithic angular clasts a few tens of centimeters across, in the floors of some of the 373
grooves, very similar to the clasts forming the blocks of the matrix rich debris avalanche facies . 374
Apart from these clasts, the groove floors are largely covered by soft sediment. The best 375
exposures of grooves are on top of the sediment mesas, although they are also exposed in the 376
intervening areas. Isolated mound features, several tens of meters across and with high 377
backscatter intensity are also present in the grooved terrain. 378
379
5.3. Distal debris avalanche flow facies 380
381
The transition between the matrix rich debris avalanche facies and the distal deposits to 382
the north is gradual without a sharp boundary that can be differentiated in the seismic data. The 383
hummocks that characterized the matrix rich facies with presence of debris avalanche blocks 384
decrease to leave a relatively flat seabed of acoustically transparent material in the distal deposits. 385
This type of transition is common in debris avalanches that transform to debris flows, whilst in 386
debris avalanche lobes where this transformation does not occur the lobe has an abrupt front 387
(Capra et al., 2001). We mapped an approximate limit for this transformation, based on the 388
difference in backscatter intensity. The distinction between the two facies is also supported by 389
Page 18
comparison of TowCam images from tows 5 and 6 (matrix facies) with tows 3 and 4 (distal 390
facies). Here we discuss the depositional and erosional features of the distal facies. 391
392
5.3.1 Depositional features 393
394
The distal landslide deposit consists of a laterally extensive sheet extending over a broad, 395
almost flat submarine plain with an average slope of 0.11º. Within the distal deposit are areas with 396
differential high or low backscatter intensity that correspond to variations on the slope but that do 397
not show acoustic variations in the CHIRP profiles. The margins of the deposit are ill-defined and 398
in at least some places covered by more recent sediment (see below). It is likely that the distal 399
deposit extends out of the northern limit of backscatter mapping beneath the “undivided marine 400
sediments” unit of Figure 12. Figure 11 shows representative portions of seismic lines along and 401
across the distal facies, where the deposit is recognized as a transparent unit beneath a strong echo 402
and overlying a sedimentary sequence. In contrast to the matrix-rich debris avalanche facies, the 403
distal facies lacks the characteristic hummock facies typical of debris avalanches. We used a 404
nominal water velocity of 1500 m/s to estimate the thickness of the deposits. The minimum 405
thickness of the deposit is about 2 m in areas with somewhat greater slope. The deposit is 5-10 m 406
thick in the areas where we recognized a reflection beneath the transparent acoustic facies, but in 407
many areas it may be thicker, because the CHIRP system failed to image any reflector beneath the 408
avalanche. 409
The TowCam images across the distal deposits show that the seabed exposes areas of soft 410
sediment, as indicated by the presence of bioturbation and the lack of sessile epifauna, and areas 411
with abundant dark, rounded clasts 10-20 cm across partially covered by lighter sediment (Figure 412
Page 19
10h). In the transitions from areas with low to high clast abundance, we observed clast alignments 413
and concentrations in ridges. The clast alignments are oriented SW to NE on the seabed 414
(TowCam 3, Figure 3) parallel to a fabric seen in the backscatter intensity data. 415
Dredge samples indicate that the clasts are cohesive silt-grade sediment (Figure 10i, see 416
TowCam 3 in Figure 3 for location). The size of the clasts in the dredge is comparable to the size 417
of the dark clasts in the camera images. Comparison with the sizes of the scallops seen in the 418
grooved terrain and an inferred similarity between the silt-grade sediments in the clasts found in 419
the dredge and the cohesive sediments seen in the grooved terrain and the walls of the sediment 420
mesas suggests that the debris flow deposits contain a high proportion of sediments eroded by the 421
landslide. In contrast, only four small lithic clasts were present in dredge sample: a reworked 422
dacitic pumice pebble, two clasts of andesitic and dacitic composition and a basaltic fragment of 423
Mg-rich olivine and chrome spinel–phyric; not being the latter similar to the basalts of any of the 424
adjacent volcanic islands (Johnson et al., 1972). 425
In the northwestern margin of the distal deposit we mapped a series of arcuate features in 426
the backscatter that were recognized as sediment waves coming from the island of Tolokiwa 427
(Hoffman et al., 2008) (Figures 3 and 12) and these are also seen in the chirp data. We also 428
interpret the existence of sediment waves surrounding the eastern margin of the landslide deposit, 429
coming in this case from the Dampier strait. 430
431
5.3.2. Erosional features 432
433
No erosional features were observed over the main area of the distal deposit. However, its 434
southern margin extends along the foot of the line of sediment mesas discussed in the previous 435
Page 20
section, whilst its western margin is located at the foot of a scarp some tens of metres high eroded 436
into marine sediments that was partly imaged in TowCam 4 (Figure 3) crossing that margin. 437
Scalloped features at the crest of the scarp, similar to those seen in the grooved terrain, were 438
imaged by the TowCam (Figure 10x and y). It is therefore possible that the southern part of the 439
distal deposit (X in Figure X. SIMON, I need the exact location for this area), covering an area 440
some 20 km (E-W) by 10 km (N-S) lies within an area where mass erosion or failure of sediment 441
in the substrate excavated the seafloor to a depth of up to 20 to 40 m (the height of the highest 442
sediment mesas above their surroundings). 443
444
6. Volume estimates 445
446
6.1. Volume of the scar 447
Volume estimation of a volcanic island flank collapse where a well-defined escarpment or 448
amphitheater exists can be done by subtracting a grid of the present topography from a grid of the 449
calculated pre-collapse surface. The latter is usually obtained by extrapolating the topographic 450
and bathymetric contours across the embayment (e.g., Urgeles et al, 1997). For the Ritter 451
collapse, where most of the subaerial part of the island and the inferred convex submarine flank 452
has disappeared in a single event, it is necessary not just to extrapolate, but also to restore the 453
whole original island’s topography. 454
Restoration of the pre-collapse topography of Ritter together with an extrapolation of the 455
submarine collapse scar as a single curved surface approximates the initial pre-collapsed shape of 456
the island and its submarine failed flank (Figure 13a). To create the pre-collapse grid it was 457
necessary to remove the landslide blocks, the post-collapse volcanic eruptions and to smooth the 458
Page 21
erosion of the submarine valley assumed to have been excavated during the event. Subtracting the 459
reconstructed slide surface (Figure 13b) from the reconstructed pre-collapse topography we 460
obtained a total volume of 4.2 km3 for the slide mass involved in the collapse of Ritter. The 461
contoured difference between these two surfaces used to calculate the volume is shown in Figure 462
13c. 463
464
6.2. Volume of the deposits 465
466
In comparing collapse scar and deposit volumes, it is important to recognize the 467
occurrence of dilation during failure and landslide movement. The deposits of the well 468
constrained 1980 Mount St. Helens debris avalanche were estimated to have experienced around 469
25% dilation over their pre-collapse volume (Glicken; 1996). Gridding the thickness of the block 470
facies in the avalanche within the limits of the Ritter deposit mapped provided a volume of 4 km3. 471
Nevertheless, if we correct the latter value for a 25 % of dilation during the collapse, a volume of 472
3 km3 of the initial collapse material would have been necessary to form the large block debris 473
avalanche facies. Because we have obtained a volume of 4.2 km3 for the Ritter Island subaerial 474
and submarine scar, we infer that a fraction of about 71% of the initial landslide material never 475
got beyond the constriction in the valley between Sakar and Umboi islands, and is now emplaced 476
as the large block facies deposit. Only a smaller volume of material reached farther downslope 477
and was highly efficient in mobilizing the substrate. 478
Estimates of the volume of the matrix rich debris avalanche facies deposit and of the 479
volume of material eroded by the passage of the landslide before its emplacement are uncertain 480
because none of the chirp lines provided deposit thickness in this area. We infer that the bulk of 481
Page 22
the distal debris flow deposit is largely not from the initial collapse but rather from entrained 482
sediment, which is consistent with the low abundance (<1%) of lithic clasts in the dredge sample. 483
Estimation of the volume of the distal deposit is complicated by the sediment cover on the eastern 484
margin and by its uncertain northern limit. It is likely that the distal deposit extends out of the 485
northern limit of backscatter mapping (Figure 3). Within the mapped region the deposit area is 486
about 800 km2. Silver et al. (2009) estimated an average thickness of 46 m for the block-rich part 487
of the debris avalanche deposit. For the Canary Island collapses, Masson et al. (2002) reported 488
average thicknesses of 100 m (El Golfo slide), 10 m (Canary slide), 23 m (Saharan slide), 75 m 489
(Guimar slide), and 122 m (Cumbre Nueva slide); and Llanes et al. (2003) reported an average 490
thickness of 72 m for Anaga debris avalanche. Satake and Kato (2001) reported an average 491
thickness of 36 m for the Oshima-Oshima debris avalanche; Francis et al. (1985) estimated 492
average thickness of the Socompa deposit as 31 m; Deplus et al. (2001) measured 225 m near the 493
distal edge of the St. Lucia debris avalanche, and Belousov and Belousova (1998) reported 494
average thicknesses of 30 m, 14 m, and 9 m, each for the northern, central and southern parts of 495
the March 30, 1956 Kezymyannyi (Kamchatka) debris avalanche deposits. 496
The thickness of the Ritter debris avalanche deposit varies within the mapped region. High 497
frequency CHIRP seismic data taken over the distal facies (Figure 11) show thicknesses of 7-10 498
m for much of the region for which we have data. If we assume a conservative average thickness 499
of 8 m, the minimum volume of the avalanche should be 6.4 km3. This conservative value would 500
imply that at most 15% of the distal deposit is composed of lithic clasts originating from the 501
initial collapse of the Ritter Island edifice, and likely less because of the finite although unknown 502
volume of the matrix-rich debris avalanche facies deposit. 503
504
Page 23
7. Discussion 505
506
7.1. Instability and triggering of edifice collapse 507
508
Our data do not provide direct evidence on the processes that triggered the March 13th 509
1888 lateral collapse of Ritter Island, but they they provide potential controls on the geometry of 510
the collapse and hence factors that may have made the edifice susceptible to failure. 511
The 1888 Ritter Island sector collapse differs from most subaerial volcano collapses in 512
that the collapse scar cuts down to the base of the edifice and perhaps into the substrate. Subaerial 513
lateral collapses typically cut half way down to the base of the pre-collapse edifice, like the 1980 514
Mount St. Helens collapse (Siebert et al., 1987). In a few subaerial volcanoes and other submarine 515
or island volcanoes, the failure occurs at the base of the edifice or in the substrate. At the 516
Socompa volcano, it has been argued that the reason for failure at the base of the volcano lies in 517
pre-collapse deformation of weak, water-saturated sediments at the base of the edifice (Francis et 518
al., 1985; Van Wyk de Vries et al., 2001). This deformation is manifested in a series of anticlines 519
extending beyond the foot of the volcano, the crests of which form ridges that now project 520
through the landslide deposit (Van Wyk de Vries et al., 2001). In the data from Ritter Island, we 521
did not find any evidence of pre-collapse deformation. The Ritter volcano was most likely built 522
upon marine sediments that could have provided a weak basal layer that localized the failure at 523
the base of the volcano. Other examples of volcanoes cutting down to the base of the edifice are 524
the failure of Unzen in 1792 (Siebert et al. 1987) and the collapse scar at Bandai, that cuts 525
unusually deep into the edifice (Siebert et al. 1987). Both of these lateral collapses were 526
Page 24
associated with phreatic hydrothermal explosions and hot groundwater discharges, and lacked 527
associated large-scale magmatic eruptions, similar to Ritter. 528
There is no evidence that tectonic triggers such as large-scale fault movements or 529
gravitational settling-related faulting initiated the Ritter landslide. Environmental factors such as 530
high-intensity rainstorms, which can cause a reduction in strength of the edifice due to saturation 531
(McGuire, 2003), were also absent. The collapse lacked an associated large-volume magmatic 532
eruption, but was likely associated with phreatic or phreatomagmatic explosions, because 533
observations of vapor emission at Ritter were reported only a week before the collapse (Cooke, 534
1981), indicating that a shallow hydrothermal system was present within the edifice (Siebert et al., 535
1987). The Bandai and Unzen types of lateral collapse may be triggered by pore fluid 536
pressurization deep within the edifice due to fluid input and / or heating from magmatic intrusions 537
emplaced well below the base of the edifice, rather than within the edifice as in the case of the 538
1980 Mount St. Helens cryptodome (Day, 1996; Reid, 2004). In these cases, the locus of 539
pressurization, deformation and failure may be in low permeability layers near or at the base of 540
the volcano: this could be another mechanism by which a substrate of compacted deep marine 541
sediments could account for the geometry of the 1888 Ritter Island collapse structure. 542
There is no geological evidence in our data for multiple or retrogressive failures of the 543
Ritter Island volcano within the 1888 collapse event, but we cannot exclude the possibility that 544
lateral collapse at Ritter involved successive blocks beginning to move tens of seconds apart. 545
Retrogressive failures with blocks beginning to move a few tens of seconds apart and successive 546
failures a few minutes apart have been directly observed by eyewitnesses at Mount St. Helens in 547
1980 (Voight, 1981) and Stromboli in 2002 (Bonaccorso et al., 2003) respectively, but the effects 548
in the deposits are subtle and ambiguous (Glicken, 1996; Ward & Day, 2006). Evidence that the 549
Page 25
collapse at Ritter Island began as a single failure or as a rapid sequence of retrogressive failures 550
no more than a few tens of seconds apart, is principally provided by the single tsunami that it 551
produced (Cooke, 1981; Ward & Day, 2003). 552
553
7.2. Landslide erosion 554
555
7.2.1 Scouring 556
557
The scouring mark found in the slope of Umboi island (Figure 5) lacks a distinct 558
bathymetric expression and the upslope boundary of the very high backscatter zone has no 559
expression in the chirp profile that crosses it, unlike the boundaries of the other deposits that we 560
associate with the 1888 Ritter Island collapse in this paper. Similarly, it appears unlikely that it is 561
a deposit originating from further upslope, since all other such deposits evident in the backscatter 562
data from Umboi and also Sakar trend down the slope. Furthermore, it is not an artifact due to the 563
angle relative to the beam, because in that case the upslope of the contact would then have the 564
higher backscatter not the lower one. Instead, in the light of the undulating nature of the upslope 565
contact and the way it passes upslope over of the small ridge, an alternative interpretation is that it 566
is an erosional feature comparable to the scouring of the walls of Coldwater creek by a fast-567
moving lobe of the 1980 Mount St. Helens debris avalanche (Voight et al., 1981; Fisher et al., 568
1987; Glicken 1996). Figure 5 compares the two features. 569
The landslide moving at high velocity, obliquely impacting the slope of Umboi and 570
running up the slope, rising as it impinged on the small ridge, may explain the pattern of inferred 571
erosion. This feature is not simply a “high tide” mark recording the maximum thickness of the 572
Page 26
landslide as it moved parallel to the slope, because this does not account for the sharp rise in the 573
upslope contact up and over the small ridge, nor does it explain why a comparable feature is not 574
observed at the same elevations on the slope of Sakar. The orientation of the collapse scar, which 575
faces obliquely towards Umboi and away from Sakar may explain the lack of a corresponding 576
feature on the slopes of Sakar. 577
578
7.2.2. Black Streak 579
580
The very high intensity backscatter character of this unit, together with its differential 581
relief in the bathymetry and the uniformity of the size clasts imaged with the photographs, lead us 582
to interpret the Black Streak as a volcanic unit. The uniformity of the size clasts (10 to 20 cm 583
across) is rarely seen in debris avalanche deposits, but is typical of scoriaceous volcanic units. 584
Thus, we infer that this feature is the core of an in-situ submarine volcanic vent whose top was 585
eroded off by the leading part of the landslide. 586
587
7.2.3. Mesas 588
589
The development of scarps and troughs in the mesas located to either side of the lobes of 590
the matrix-rich debris avalanche deposit (M in Figure 9) lead us to interpret them as erosional 591
features related to a flow moving from SE to NW, similar to the groove trend seen to the SE. The 592
formation of the mesas must predate emplacement of the matrix-rich debris avalanche facies lobes 593
in the troughs between the mesas, but the association between them indicates that they are both 594
related to the Ritter landslide event. However, the mesas and troughs located along the SW 595
Page 27
margin of the matrix rich facies deposit (M’ in Fig. 9, Line 3/1 in Fig. 10) may not be originated 596
by a flow moving down-slope, but instead they may be the result of uneven upslope retreat of 597
scarps developed at the lateral margin of the moving debris avalanche, as a result of undermining 598
the foot of the slope by erosion along the valley axis, followed by development of progressive 599
slumping upslope. 600
601
7.2.4. Grooved terrain 602
603
The groove walls have strength sufficient for the delicate sponges to attach themselves, 604
but are too weak to support the other elements of the fauna seen on the debris avalanche blocks. 605
Scalloped but linear grooves eroded in cohesive water-saturated sediment have been produced 606
experimentally by high velocity water flows simulating tidal flows over littoral muds 607
(Winterwerp & Van Kesteren, 2004). The grooves imaged in our work are very similar to the 608
intermediate-stress bulk erosion regime, as characterize experimentally by the latter work. We 609
infer that the grooved terrain was generated by bulk erosion of older marine sediments at the base 610
of a high velocity component of the Ritter debris avalanche that extended over a wider front than 611
the narrow matrix-rich debris avalanche deposit. Further evidence for the association of the 612
grooves with the Ritter landslide is provided by the occurrence of sparse, scattered lithic angular 613
clasts a few tens of centimeters across, in the floors of some of the grooves, very similar to the 614
clasts forming the blocks of the matrix rich debris avalanche facies (Figure 10). Isolated mound 615
features, several tens of meters across and with high backscatter intensity, are also present in the 616
grooved terrain, which we interpret as isolated debris avalanche blocks. 617
618
Page 28
7.3. Inferred landslide kinematics 619
620
The collapse of Ritter left a deposit composed of three different facies, a division that 621
implies three distinct stages in the movement and rheological evolution of the landslide. The 622
distribution of these facies and the different types of erosional structure, together with the overall 623
geometry of the deposit can be used to reconstruct the movement and evolution of the landslide, 624
as Glicken (1991; 1996) showed could be done in the case of the 1980 Mount St. Helens collapse. 625
The grooved terrain and the sediment mesas indicate the occurrence of extensive erosion, 626
of at least the top 20 meters of the existing sediment sequence in these areas. The association of 627
the grooved terrain with isolated debris avalanche blocks, the occurrence of scattered lithic clasts 628
in the smaller grooves imaged with the TowCam, and the channelization of the debris avalanche 629
lobes between the sediment mesas, indicate that the erosion took place during the landslide, and 630
that deposition of the matrix rich facies debris avalanche deposit took place after the substrate 631
erosion. We conclude that the erosional features were produced by the fast moving leading part of 632
the landslide that, after being deflected off the submarine slope of Umboi in a “bobsled” fashion 633
similar to that seen in some subaerial landslides in mountain valleys (Evans et al., 1989), reached 634
beyond the constriction and spread out over a front up to 10 km wide (corresponding to the width 635
of the grooved terrain and the line of sediment mesas). The distribution of the grooved terrain and 636
the sediment mesas indicate that it was this part of the landslide that generated the substrate 637
erosion and the debris flow. In contrast the matrix rich debris avalanche was deposited from the 638
slower, trailing part that was confined to the axis of the valley between Umboi and Sakar. 639
The landslide pushed waves up that devastated the coast of Sakar and Umboi islands to 640
more than 15 m of elevation (Ward and Day, 2003). Run-up of landslides onto valley walls can be 641
Page 29
also used to estimate landslide velocities, by equating the potential energy gained in the run-up to 642
the minimum kinetic energy of the moving material at the base of the slope. This argument was 643
applied to landslides by Heim (1882) and had notable applications to the debris avalanche of 644
Mount St. Helens (Voight et al., 1983) and to the Osceola mudflow at Rainier (Vallance & Scott, 645
1997). In Ritter, some landslide material ran up and over the slopes of Umboi and Sakar islands, 646
implying that it had sufficient kinetic energy to climb uphill. Assuming that the general level of 647
the landslide was at the 900 m level and applying this criterion would suggest that the material 648
that climbed up to 200 m over the small ridge (Figure 4) would have had a speed of order 63 m/s. 649
This is actually a high estimate because of the fact that it neglects the particle-particle interaction 650
within the debris avalanche that would tend to push particles up the slope. Ward and Day (2003) 651
obtained a more conservative velocity of 40 m/s for Ritter landslide taking into account particle 652
interaction. However, this rate is not necessarily that of the landslide as a whole, since it is likely 653
to have fragmented much earlier in its motion and the front may have been traveling significantly 654
faster than the tail. 655
656
7.4. Transformation from debris avalanche to debris flow 657
658
The SW-NE orientation of clast alignments seen on the seabed of the distal facies 659
(TowCam line 3, Figure 3) parallel to a fabric seen in the backscatter intensity data, probably 660
follows the landslide movement direction in this area and indicates pervasive shearing during 661
deposition (Figure 10g). Such structure is not seen in debris avalanches, where shear is 662
concentrated at the base and margins producing marginal levees, nor in turbidite deposits, but are 663
often seen in debris flows (REFERENCES NEEDED HERE). On account of this clast alignment 664
Page 30
fabric, the low slope of emplacement and inferred very low aspect ratio of the deposit, and the 665
lack of hummocks, we interpret the distal deposit as a debris flow unit. 666
Previous work has shown that progressive disintegration of landslide blocks can generate 667
debris flow deposits extending downslope from the original landslide (Piper et al., 1999; Gee et 668
al., 1999; Scott et al., 2001). These transformations often occur by erosion and entrainment of 669
water rich sediments, glacier ice and other debris from the substrates over which the landslides 670
move. Where there is abundant substrate that is easily entrained, as in the floors of glaciated 671
valleys, the total volume of both volcanic and non volcanic landslides can increase by more than 672
1000% over the initial failure volume (Plafker & Ericksen, 1978; Scott et al., 2001; Erismann & 673
Abele, 2001; Kaab et al., 2003), a process known as bulking (Scott et al., 2001). Bulking 674
increases the total landslide runout distance and the landslide mobility, given by the decrease in 675
drop height / run-out distance ratio and commonly interpreted as effective friction coefficient. 676
Understanding the development of landslide facies and the role of bulking is therefore key to the 677
understanding of landslide mechanics and potential tsunamis. 678
The transformation of the leading part of the Ritter debris avalanche into the debris flow 679
was also related to substrate erosion and entrainment, as suggested by the dominance of sediment 680
intraclasts in the dredge sample and in the TowCam images, in contrast to the lithic clast 681
dominated mounds seen in the matrix rich debris avalanche facies. The exposed areas of substrate 682
erosion in the grooved terrain and the sediment mesas upslope of the present transition from 683
debris avalanche deposit to debris flow deposit are likely sources of the entrained sediment. In 684
addition, the scarps along the western margin of the deposit indicate that another source is the 20 685
km by 10 km area bounded by the scarp to the west and the sediment mesas to the southeast and 686
now covered by the upslope, proximal parts of the debris flow deposit itself (SIMON, I need the 687
Page 31
exact location of this area in Figure 12). The lack of distinct raised sediment mesas within the 688
latter area implies that such erosion must have involved complete removal of the substrate by 689
mass failure, the most complete mechanism of substrate erosion identified by Winterwerp & Van 690
Kesteren (2004). The coincidence of this change from mass erosion in the grooved terrain, to 691
mass failure around and to the N of the sediment mesas, with the margin of the near-flat plain on 692
which the debris flow was deposited, may be due to a transition from stronger or coarser sediment 693
on the submarine slopes of Umboi and Sakar to weaker, finer grained sediment on the plain that 694
was more susceptible to failure under the impact of the fast-moving leading part of the landslide. 695
Alternatively, Talling et al. (2007) showed how debris flows could deposit very little 696
sediment and be locally very erosive in large areas far from the sources, and then sediment 697
deposition could be triggered by a remarkably small but abrupt decrease in sea-floor gradient 698
from 0.05° to 0.01°. In this case, our data show that there is an order of magnitude reduction in 699
slope between the area of debris avalanche (1.6-2.1º) and the area of debris flow deposition (0.1º). 700
The coincidence of the facies transition and the break in slope could indicate that the debris-flow 701
deposition started due to rapid deceleration of the flow, because deceleration reduces the turbulent 702
mixing and sand settles more rapidly, as interpreted by Talling et al. (2007); however, this process 703
does not explain the onset of mass failure at the break in slope. The two mechanisms may not be 704
mutually exclusive, because conservation of momentum requires that a sudden bulking of the 705
landslide due to mass failure of the substrate would be accompanied by a reduction in its velocity. 706
Debris flow and turbidite deposits associated with 1888 Ritter collapse may be found 707
much farther to the north and west in the Bismarck Sea Basin than the area mapped, similarly to 708
what has been identified associated with the 1929 Grand Banks continental slope failure (Piper et 709
Page 32
al., 1985) and with the Canary (Talling et al., 2007; Hunt et al., 2011) and Hawaii (Kanamatsu et 710
al., 2002) landslides. 711
712
CONCLUSIONS 713
714
1) The collapse of Ritter Island in 1888 removed most of the island and was probably 715
associated with phreatic or phreatomagmatic explosions. Based on our mapping, the collapse scar 716
cut down into the base of the edifice. Most subaerial volcano collapses cut only part-way to the 717
edifice base. We conclude that the collapse resulted from a single event because in mapping the 718
full seafloor around the island we found no field evidence either onshore or offshore that more 719
than one collapse occurred then or in the past. Historical accounts and tsunami modeling also are 720
consistent with a single event. 721
2) The deposits of the landslide generated by the collapse comprise three differentiated 722
facies: large block, matrix-rich and debris flow distal facies. The transitions from large block to 723
matrix-rich facies and from the latter to distal facies are related to major changes in the slopes and 724
constrictions. The facies are well differentiated by their characteristics, as observed in our various 725
datasets including bathymetry, side-scan sonar, high-resolution seismic data and tow-cam 726
photographs. 727
3) Tow-cam photographs of the sea-bottom provided important constraints on the remote 728
sensing and are very useful for studying landslide facies in subdued areas. Characteristics seen in 729
the photos provided valuable information for mapping the facies of the avalanche including: 730
morphology of the deposit, clasts aspect, distribution and abundance, presence/absence and type 731
of organisms indicative of substrate strength, and signs of erosion such as scalloped walls. 732
Page 33
4) Volumetric calculations based on the restoration of a modeled original topography led 733
to a total volume estimate of 4.2 km3 for the initial Ritter Island collapse. After correcting from 734
dilatation, we infer that about 75% of the material from the initial collapse now forms the large 735
block facies at distances of less than 12 km from the collapse scar, filling an area between the 736
islands of Umboi and Sakar and topographically constricted by volcanic ridges from those 737
islands. The volume of the matrix-rich facies is unknown, but the distal debris flow facies 738
deposits have a minimum volume of 6.4 km3, as a result of bulking of the landslide through 739
sediment entrainment. This highlights the efficiency of substrate erosion during the later history 740
of the landslide movement, when much of its original volume had been retained in the large block 741
facies deposits upslope. 742
5) Recent submarine landslide deposits that are well-exposed can be interpreted similarly 743
to subaerial volcano collapse deposits. In turn, these deposits can provide a basis for the 744
interpretation of older and incompletely exposed landslide deposits. Understanding the 745
mechanisms and kinematics of collapse events can improve tsunami modeling. 746
747
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 748
749
This work was supported by National Science Foundation grant OCE-0327004 to Eli 750
Silver and Steve Ward, and grant OCE-0328278 to Neal Driscoll. Participation of Pilar Llanes 751
was possible thanks to grants “Becas del Amo 2008” from Universidad Complutense de Madrid 752
and “Movilidad para Profesores 2011” from Caja Madrid Foundation. We are grateful for the 753
advice and support of many people in carrying out this research, including Dan Fornari, Bruce 754
Appelgate, Jennifer Engels, Steve Saunders, Hugh Davies, James Robins, and Amilia Lyons. We 755
Page 34
are indebted to the officers, crew, and scientific party of the R/V Kilo Moana for their cooperation 756
at sea. Figs. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 13 were drawn using GMT software (Wessel and Smith, 1995). 757
758
REFERENCES CITED 759
OK Belousov, A.B., and M.G. Belousova, 1998. Bezymyannyi eruption on March 30, 1956 760
(Kamchatka): Sequence of events and debris avalanche deposits. Volc. Seis., 20, 29-47. 761
OK Bonaccorso, A., Calvari, S., Garfi, G., Lodato, L., & Patane, D., 2003. Dynamics of the 762
December 2002 flank failure and tsunami at Stromboli volcano inferred by volcanological 763
and geophysical observations. Geophysical Research Letters 30(18), 1941, 764
doi:10.1029/2003GL017702. 765
OK Boudon, G., A. Le Friant, J.-C. Komorowski, C. Deplus, and M. P. Semet, 2007. Volcano 766
flank instability in the Lesser Antilles Arc: Diversity of scale, processes, and temporal 767
recurrence, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B08205, doi:10.1029/ 2006JB004674. 768
OK Capra, L., Macías, J.L., Scott, K.M., Abrams, M., Garduño-Monroy, V.H., 2002. Debris 769
avalanches and debris flows transformed from collapses in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic 770
Belt, Mexico — behavior, and implications for hazard assessment. Journal of Volcanology 771
and Geothermal Research 113 (1–2), 81–110. 772
OK Carracedo, J.C., Day, S.J., & Guillou, H., 1999. Quaternary collapse structures and the 773
evolution of the western Canaries (La Palma and El Hierro). Journal of Volcanology and 774
Geothermal Research 94, 169 - 190. 775
OK Carracedo, J.C., Badiola, E.R., Guillou, H., de la Nuez, J. & Perez Torrado, F.J., 2002. 776
Geology and Volcanology of La Palma and El Hierro, Western Canaries. Estudios 777
Geologicos 57, 175 – 273. 778
Page 35
OK Cooke, R.J.S., McKee, C.O., Dent, V.F., & Wallace, D.A., 1976. Striking sequence of 779
volcanic eruptions in the Bismarck volcanic arc, Papua New Guinea, 1972 – 1975. In: 780
R.W. Johnson (ed.) Volcanism in Australasia, 149 – 172. Publ. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 781
OK Cooke, R.J.S., 1981. Eruptive history of the volcano at Ritter Island. In: R.W. Johnson (ed.). 782
Cooke-Ravian Volume of Volcanological Papers. Geological Survey of Papua New 783
Guinea Memoir 10, 115-123. 784
OK Crandall, D.R., Miller, C.D., Glicken, H.X., Christiansen, R.L., & Newhall, C.G., 1984. 785
Catastrophic debris avalanche from ancestral Mount Shasta volcano, California. Geology 786
12, 143 – 146. 787
OK Crandall, D.R., 1988. Gigantic Debris Avalanche of Pleistocene Age From Ancestral Mount 788
Shasta Volcano, California, and Debris Avalanche Hazard Zonation. United States 789
Geological Survey Bulletin 1861, 32 pp. 790
OK Dampier, W., 1729. A Voyage to New Holland. Republished with an introduction by J. 791
Spencer 2006. Publ. Nonsuch Press, Gloucester. 792
OK Day, S.J., 1996. Hydrothermal pore fluid pressure and the stability of porous, permeable 793
volcanoes. In: W. McGuire, J. Neuberg & A. Jones (eds.) Volcano instability on the Earth 794
and terrestrial planets" Geological Society of London Special Publication 110, 77 - 93. 795
OK Day, S.J., S.I.N. Heleno da Silva, S.I.N. & Fonseca, J.F.B.D., 1999. A past giant lateral 796
collapse and present day flank instability of Fogo, Cape Verde Islands. Journal of 797
Volcanology and Geothermal Research 94, 191 - 218. 798
OK Deplus, C., Le Friant, A., Boudon, G., Komorowski, J.C., Villemant, B., Harford, C., 799
Segoufin, J. & Cheminee, J.L., 2001. Submarine evidence for large – scale debris 800
Page 36
avalanches in the Lesser Antilles Arc. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 192, 145 – 801
157. 802
OK Dumont d’Urville, J.S.C., 1832. Voyage de la Corvette L’Astrolabe, execute par ordre du 803
Roi, pendant les annees 1826 – 1827 – 1828 – 1829, sous le commandement de M.J. 804
Dumont D’Urville, Capitaine de Vaisseau. Tome Quatrieme. Histoire du Voyage. Publ. 805
Tastu, Paris. 806
OK Erismann, T.H. & Abele, G., 2001. Dynamics of Rockslides and Rockfalls. Publ. Springer-807
Verlag, Berlin. 808
OK Evans, S.G., Clague, J.J., Woodsworth, G.J. & Hungr, O., 1989. The Pandemonium Creek 809
Rock Avalanche, British Columbia. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 26, 427-446. 810
OK Fisher, N. H., 1939. Report on the volcanoes of the Territory of New Guinea, Geological 811
Bulletin # 2, Administration of the Territory of New Guinea. 812
OK Fisher, N.H., 1957. Catalogue of the Active Volcanoes of the World. Part V: Melanesia. Publ. 813
International Volcanological Association, Naples. 814
OK Fisher, R.V., Glicken, H.X. & Hoblitt, R.P. (1987). May 18, 1980, Mount St. Helens deposits 815
in South Coldwater Creek, Washington. Journal of Geophysical Research 92, 10.267-816
10,283. 817
OK Francis, P.W., M. Gardeweg, C.F. Ramirez, and D.A. Rothery, 1985. Catastrophic debris 818
avalanche deposit of Socompa volcano, northern Chile. Geology, 13, 600-603. 819
OK Gee, M. J. R., Masson, D. G., Watts, A. B. & Allen, P. A. 1999. The Saharan debris flow: an 820
insight into the mechanics of long runout debris flows. Sedimentology 46, 317–335. 821
(doi:10.1046/j.1365- 3091.1999.00215.x). 822
OK Glicken, H.X., 1991. Sedimentary architecture of large volcanic debris avalanches. In: R.V. 823
Page 37
Fisher & G.A. Smith (eds.) Sedimentation in Volcanic Settings. Society of Economic 824
Mineralogists and Petrologists Special Publication 45, 99 – 106. 825
OK Glicken, H.X. 1996. Rockslide – Debris Avalanche of May 18, 1980, Mount St. Helens 826
Volcano, Washington. United States Geological Survey Open File Report 96-677. 827
OK Heim, A., 1882. Der Burgsturz von Elm. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 828
34, 74-115. 829
OK Hoffmann, G., E. Silver, S. Day, E. Morgan, N. Driscoll, D. Orange, 2008. Sediment waves 830
in the Bismarck Volcanic Arc, Papua New Guinea. In: Formation and applications of the 831
sedimentary record in arc collision zones. Geol. Soc. Of Am. Spec. Paper 436. 832
OK Hunt, J.E., R. B. Wynn, D. G. Masson, P. J. Talling, D. A. H. Teagle, 2011. Sedimentological 833
and geochemical evidence for multistage failure of volcanic island landslides: A case 834
study from Icod landslide on north Tenerife, Canary Islands. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 835
V. 12, pp. Q12007, doi:10.1029/2011GC003740. 836
OK Jacobs, T.J., 1844. Scenes, Incidents and Adventures in the Pacific Ocean, or the Islands of 837
the Australasian Seas, During the Cruise of the Clipper Margaret Oakley Under Capt. 838
Benjamin Morell. Publ. Harper & Bros., New York. 839
OK Johnson, R.W., Taylor, G.A.M., & Davies, R.A., 1972. Geology and Petrology of Quaternary 840
Volcanic Islands off the North Coast of New Guinea. Bureau of Mineral Resources, 841
Geology and Geophysics Record 1972/21. 842
OK Johnson, R.W., 1987. Large scale volcanic cone collapse: the 1888 slope failure of Ritter 843
Volcano. Bulletin of Volcanology 49, 669-679. 844
Page 38
OK Kaab, A., Wessels, R., Haeberli, W., Huggel, C., Kargel, J.S. and Khalsa, S.J.S., 2003. Rapid 845
ASTER Imaging Facilitates Timely Assessment of Glacier Hazards and Disasters. Eos 846
84(13), 117, 121. 847
OK Le Friant, A., Heinrich, P., Deplus, C., & Boudon, G., 2003. Numerical simulation of the last 848
flank – collapse event of Montagne Pelee, Martinique, Lesser Antilles. Geophysical 849
Research Letters 30(2), 1034, doi:10.1029/2002GL015903. 850
OK Llanes P., Muñoz, A., Muñoz-Martín, A., Acosta, J., Herranz, P., Carbó, A., Palomo, C., 851
2003, Mar. Geophys. Res., 24, 91-112. 852
OK Masson, D.G., Watts, A.B., Gee, M.J.R., Urgeles, R., Mitchell, N.C., Le Bas, T.P. & Canals, 853
M., 2002. Slope failures on the flanks of the western Canary Islands. Earth-Science 854
Reviews 57, 1 – 35. 855
OK McGuire, W.J., 2003. Volcano instability and lateral collapse. Revista, 1, pp. 33–45. 856
OK Moore, J.G., Clague, D.A., Holcomb, R.T., Lipman, P.W., Normark, W.R. & Torresan, M.E., 857
1989. Prodigious submarine landslides on the Hawaiian ridge. Journal of Geophysical 858
Research 94, 17465-17484. 859
OK Moore, J.G., Normark, W.R., and Holcomb, R.T., 1994. Giant Hawaiian Landslides. Annual 860
Review of Earth and Planetary Science 22, 119-144. 861
OK Plafker G, Ericksen GE. 1978. Nevados Huascaran avalanches, Peru. In Rockslides and 862
Avalanches. 1: Natural Phenomena, ed. B Voight, pp. 277–314. Amsterdam: Elsevier 863
OK Piper, D.J.W., Sparkes, R., Mosher, D.C., Shor, A.N. and Farre, J.A. 1985. Seabed instability 864
near the epicenter of the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake. Geolog. Survey of Canada, Open 865
File 1131, 29 pp. 866
OK Piper, D. J. W., Cochonat, P. & Morrison, M. L. 1999 The sequence of events around the 867
Page 39
epicentre of the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake: initiation of debris flows and turbidity 868
currents inferred from sidescan sonar. Sedimentology 46, 79–97. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-869
3091.1999.00204.x). 870
OK Reid, M.E., 2004. Massive collapse of volcano edifices triggered by hydrothermal 871
pressurization. Geology 32, 373–376. 872
OK Satake, K. & Kato, Y., 2001. The 1741 Oshima-Oshima eruption: extent and volume of 873
submarine debris avalanche. Geophysical Research Letters 28, 427-430. 874
OK Scott, K., Macias, J.L., Naranjo, J.A., Rodriguez, S. and McGeehin, J.P., 2001. Catastrophic 875
debris flows transformed from landslides in volcanic terrains: mobility, hazard assessment 876
and mitigation strategies. U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 1630. 877
OK Siebert, L., Glicken, H., Ui, T., 1987. Volcanic hazards from Bezymianny and Banda type 878
eruptions. Bull.Volcanol. 49, 435 – 459. 879
OK Silver, E., Day, S.J., Ward, S.N., Hoffmann, G., Llanes-Estrada, P., Driscoll, N., Appelgate, 880
B., Saunders, S. (2009). Volcano collapse and tsunami generation in the Bismarck 881
Volcanic Arc, Papua New Guinea. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 882
doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.06.013. 883
OK Talling, P.J., Amy, L.A., Wynn, R.B., 2007. New insight into the evolution of large-volume 884
turbidity current: comparison of turbidite shape and previous modeling results. 885
Sedimentology 54, 737–769. 886
OK Urgeles, R., Canals, M., Baraza, J., Alonso, B., Masson, D.G., 1997. The most recent 887
megaslides on the Canary Islands: the El Golfo debris avalanche and the Canary debris 888
flow, west El Hierro Island. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 20305-20323. 889
OK van Wyk de Vries, B., Self, S., Francis, P.W., and Keszthelyi, L., 2001, A gravitational 890
Page 40
spreading origin for the Socompa debris avalanche: Journal of Volcanology and 891
Geothermal Re- search, v. 105, p. 225–247. 892
OK Vallance, J.W. & Scott, K.M., 1997. The Osceola Mudflow from Mount Rainier: 893
sedfimentology and hazard implications of a huge clay-rich debris flow. Geological 894
Society of America Bulletin 109, 143-163. 895
OK Voight, B., 1981. Time scale for the first moments of the May 18 eruption. In: Lipman, P.W. 896
and Mullineaux, D.R. (eds.) The 1980 Eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washington. United 897
States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1250, 69-86. 898
OK Voight, B., Glicken, H.X., Janda, R., & Douglass, P.M., 1981. Catastrophic rockslide 899
avalanche of May 18. In: Lipman, P.W. & Mullineaux, D.R. (eds.), 1981. The 1980 900
Eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washington. United States Geological Survey 901
Professional Paper 1250, 347 – 377. 902
OK Voight, B., Janda, R.J., Glicken, H.X. & Douglass, P.M., 1983. Nature and mechanics of the 903
Mount St. Helens rockslide-avalanche of 18 May 1980. Geotechnique 33, 243-273. 904
OK Ward, S. N. & Day, S.J., 2003. Ritter Island Volcano- Lateral collapse and tsunami of 1888. 905
Geophys. Jour. Int. 154, 891 - 902. 906
OK Ward, S.N. & Day, S.J., 2006. Particulate kinematic simulations of debris avalanches: 907
interpretation of deposits and landslide seismic signals of Mount Saint Helens, 1980 May 908
18. Geophys. Jour. Int. 167, 2, 001-1004. 909
OK Watts, A.B. & Masson, D.G., 1995. A giant landslide on the north flank of Tenerife, Canary 910
Islands. Journal of Geophysical Research 100, 24487 – 24498. 911
OK Wessel P. and Smith W.H.F., 1995. New Version of the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT), 912
http:/www.agu.org/eos_els, American Geophysical Union. 913
Page 41
OK Winterwerp, J.C. & Van Kesteren, W.G.M., 2004. Introduction to the Physics of Cohesive 914
Sediment in the Marine Environment. Developments in Sedimentology 56, 466 pp. 915
OK Wright, I.C., Worthington, T.J. & Gamble, J.A., 2006. New multibeam mapping and 916
geochemistry of the 30° - 35° S sector, and overview, of southern Kermadec arc 917
volcanism. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 149, 263 – 296. 918
OK Yokose & Lipman, 2004. Emplacement mechanisms of the South Kona slide complex, 919
Hawaii Island: sampling and observations by remotely-operated vehicle Kaiko. Bull. Of 920
Vol. 66, 569-584. 921
922
FIGURE CAPTIONS 923
924
Figure 1. Location of Umboi, Sakar and Ritter islands over digital terrain model (DTM) 925
constructed from multibeam data gridded at 24 m. Topography from SRTM data. Inset shows 926
location in the New Britain volcanic arc, northeast of Papua New Guinea. 6’ of latitude = 11.1 927
km. 928
929
Figure 2. (Top) Photographs of Ritter taken in 2006, courtesy of John Holder. Left: view from the 930
west. Right: view from the southeast. (Bottom left) Sketch of Ritter Island in 1835, modified from 931
Jacobs (1844). Arrows show how the modern island was used to estimate the scale of the sketch. 932
(Bottom right) Sketch of Ritter Island in 1835, modified from Woodworth (unpublished, courtesy 933
of James Fairhead, University of Sussex, UK). 934
935
Page 42
Figure 3. Side-scan imagery of study area from MR-1 sonar data gridded at 16 m. White dotted 936
line outlines landslide deposits. BS marks location of the black streak. Yellow lines indicate chirp 937
seismic reflection profiles acquired and red lines indicate segments of those shown in the paper. 938
Transects using the underwater digital towed camera system “TowCam” are marked with dashed 939
blue line. Blue stars show location of core sites (PC for piston core and GC for gravity core) and 940
the blue circle of a dredge site. 941
942
Figure 4. Bathymetry map of study area gridded at 24 m. Contour interval is 100 m. Bathymetric 943
ridges from Umboi and Sakar constricting the valley are marked with R1 and R2 respectively. R3 944
marks the smaller ridge that the fast-moving part of the avalanche passed over. 6’ of latitude = 945
11.1 km. 946
947
Figure 5. Side-scan image detail of the large block debris avalanche facies from MR-1 sonar data 948
gridded at 16 m. Largest block are marked as B and post-collapse volcanics as V. Areas of 949
sediment scouring are labeled (see also Fig. 12, “scouring to bedrock by landslide” in inset 950
legend). R1, R2 and R3 mark bathymetric ridges constricting the valley, the later being the 951
smaller ridge that the fast-moving part of the avalanche passed over. Low backscatter light and 952
high backscatter dark. Topography from SRTM data. 6’ of latitude = 11.1 km. 953
954
Figure 6. 3D image of Ritter insular margin. Letter B marks location of the largest debris 955
avalanche block. Note how the large block facies has been confined near the island by a 956
constriction. Letter V marks location of the main post-collapse volcanic cone. Vertical 957
exaggeration is x 2. 958
Page 43
959
Figure 7. Part of CHIRP seismic line 7/0 across the large block avalanche facies. The collapse 960
blocks produced strong seabed diffractions and lack internal structures. Location of the lines is 961
shown in Figure 3. TWT denotes two way time. 962
963
Figure 8. Side-scan image detail of matrix-rich debris avalanche facies from MR-1 sonar data 964
gridded at 16 m. Low backscatter light and high backscatter dark. M for sediment mesas with 965
marked troughs around their margins in some cases. We interpret the mesas to be erosional 966
features related to a landslide or flow moving from SE to W. M* for the best example of a 967
sediment mesa (see text for details). Figure 11 shows a chirp profile crossing two of the mesas, 968
included M*. M´ for sediment mesas along the SW margin of the facies deposit and without 969
troughs developed around them. We attribute the latter to be the result of uneven upslope retreat 970
of scarps. 971
972
Figure 9. (Top) Chirp line 2/7 showing matrix-rich facies of Ritter debris avalanche and its 973
transition towards the east to a layered sedimentation at the lower insular slope of Sakar island. 974
(Middle) Continuation of Chirp Line 2/7 showing large blocks and a buried landslide deposit 975
from Sakar island. (Bottom) Line 3/1 across the insular slopes of Umboi and Sakar island 976
showing the matrix-rich facies of Ritter and the channel eroded by Ritter debris avalanche. 977
Diffractions related to hummocks. Location of the lines is shown in Figure 3. TWT denotes two 978
way time. 979
980
Page 44
Figure 10. Photograph images taken with the “TowCam” system. A) Rock clasts from a 981
hummock within the matrix-rich debris avalanche facies. B) Polygonal-jointed columnar blocks 982
in one of the hummocks within the matrix-rich debris avalanche facies. The polygonal jointing 983
suggest either dike rocks or part of a thick subaerial lava flow. C) Steep side of a hummock 984
composed of pitted clasts appartently coarsely vesicular. D) Angular clasts, dark and pitted from 985
the Black Streak. The clasts are uniform in size, around 10-20 cm across, in contrast to the very 986
poorly sorted clasts of the debris avalanche hummocks, suggesting sorting in a submarine 987
explosive eruption. E) Grooved terrain with scalloped walls. The wall is clearly overhanging, 988
indicating that the sediments are strongly cohesive F) Grooved terrain cutting into cohesive 989
sediments and with lithic angular clasts in the floor down the wall. G) Clast alignment seen in the 990
distal facies following the landslide movement direction and indicative of pervasive shearing 991
during deposition. H) Cohesive sediment clasts seen in the distal facies. I) Same clasts as seen in 992
H taken from the dredge sample. 993
994
Figure 11. Segment of CHIRP LINE 24 across the matrix-rich debris avalanche showing the pre-995
avalanche sediments, the “black streak” and sediment mesas. Lines 3/25, 2/4 and 2/5 are selected 996
segments of CHIRP profiles across the distal facies, while Line 22 shows a segment across it. Red 997
bars mark thickness of the avalanche, labeled in meters using a conservative velocity of 1500 m/s 998
to calculate the thickness (if a velocity of 1600 m/s will be used, the values will increased by a 999
6.25%). Location of the lines is shown in Figure 3. TWT denotes two way time. 1000
1001
Figure 12. Morphological interpretation of Ritter insular margin and adjacent areas. See inserted 1002
legend for interpretation of the different morphological features. 1003
Page 45
1004
Figure 13. A) Topographic and bathymetric reconstruction of Ritter Island and its insular margin 1005
before its collapse on March 13th, 1888. B) Topography of Ritter Island and insular margin after 1006
its collapse but without the post-collapse volcanic vents. C) Thickness of displaced slide mass, 1007
obtained by subtracting the latter to the former reconstructions. 1008